Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 21
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Avalanche (41)


Next birthdays
10/01 Avalanche (41)
10/02 Carl A. Willis (44)
10/03 TwirlyWhirly555 (32)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Random coil gun idea....

Move Thread LAN_403
karma2122
Thu Nov 05 2009, 02:45AM Print
karma2122 Registered Member #2457 Joined: Thu Nov 05 2009, 02:34AM
Location:
Posts: 1
First off I have very little overall knowledge about magnetism and just about anything that has to do with coil guns so I'd be more then happy for you to point out everything that is wrong with this idea!

Well recently I've been interested in making a coil gun and had an odd idea. I've read that you want a tube to be as thin as possible to improve efficiency and that's when I had this odd idea. Why don't you use magnets for tubing? What I mean is making circular magnets that aren't strong enough to capture and hold the projectile used but strong enough to keep it steady and in the center to make a "magnetic barrel". And then I was thinking...why don't you make it so that not only are the coils pulling on it but the magnets to add a bit of energy. So when the projectile is placed in the "magnetic barrel" you attach it to something to make sure it doesn't go shooting out but when you press the trigger it is released and pulled by the coil and the magnets.

My idea must be horribly wrong if nobody has tried it out yet...so please tell me everything that is wrong with it!

EDIT

Oh and I was thinking the design would be a multi stage coil one.
Back to top
wylie
Thu Nov 05 2009, 06:06AM
wylie Registered Member #882 Joined: Sat Jul 07 2007, 04:32AM
Location:
Posts: 103
just to clarify the construction: like a stack of toroidal perm. magnets, with the coil wrapped around that?

My thoughts:
  • a coil gun doesn't really need passive centering of the projectile, since it gets centered real fast once the discharge hits the coil. and i'm not sure how the magnets would center the projectile anyway; it would just stick to the side.

  • if anything, the magnets might help to confine the field. but a steel barrel, steel endcaps, and a steel pipe surround would give more confinement for the buck wouldn't they?

  • and what about the perm. magnet applying drag as the projectile leaves the coil? it doesn't turn off like the coil does, and so the projectile is going to feel that pull as its trying to leave. just seems like it provides minimal benefit while reducing velocity. especially in a multi-coil setup.
Back to top
Dave Marshall
Sat Nov 07 2009, 04:41AM
Dave Marshall Registered Member #16 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 02:22PM
Location: New Wilmington, PA
Posts: 554
Actually, I was just tinkering with a new coilgun design and my research pointed out the problem with such an approach karma. Magnets, particularly really potent ones, don't behave in quite the way you might expect when exposed to another powerful magnetic field.

The coils would have a very hard time transferring energy to the projectile while inside a magnetic tube. Not only could there be opposition between the coil and magnetic barrel, but the magnetic barrel would also actually act to shunt magnetic lines of force around, rather than through, the projectile.

Similarly, the problem with encasing coils in steel to 'contain' the magnetic field is that while you may keep the total volume of the magnetic field somewhat smaller, what you're actually doing is pulling flux density out of the center of your coil (and away from your projectile) and pushing them into the outer regions of the coil. You're also significantly increasing the coil's inductance, decreasing current capacity and increasing ramp-up time and the potential for harmful transients.

The ideal means of concentrating the field of the solenoid would actually be to dispose of a traditional barrel all together instead have a ferrite or low carbon steel rod passing through all of your coils, upon which rode a donut or tube shaped projectile.

-Dave
Back to top
TheMerovingian
Tue Nov 24 2009, 04:41PM
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
Also permanent magnets will waste lots of energy in hysteresys losses since they have a very wide hysteresis curve, so no real benefit
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.