Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 53
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Ed (49)
JC1 (49)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Disc launcher questions

Move Thread LAN_403
w1vlf
Mon Apr 07 2008, 06:53PM Print
w1vlf Registered Member #1329 Joined: Mon Feb 18 2008, 07:31PM
Location: Harwinton Connecticut
Posts: 53
Hello Folks,

Today I started building a disc launcher. The coil is made of #12 wire and is the size of a CD rom disc in diameter.
It is only 1 wire thick at this point. The hole in the center is 3/8" in diameter.
The gorilla glue is almost done curing.

I spent a while on youtube and here looking at other folk's launchers.
Here is the question:

Why did I not see, or perhaps I missed it, that anyone has mounted their launcher onto a steel backing, for the bottom side??
Would that not concentrate the magnetic field on the topside of the disc and increase the efficiency?
Also give the coil a nice firm launching pad?
PauLC
W1VLF
Back to top
Dr. Shark
Mon Apr 07 2008, 07:11PM
Dr. Shark Registered Member #75 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
The reason is that a steel backing would lead to massive eddy current losses. Furthermore, depending on the pulse you deliver to the coil, the steel backing would probably be repelled from the coil and launch the coil itself into the air!
What people do is to place a steel rod through the center hole, which has to be laminated to avoid eddy currents, and this seems to help only in low power designs.

What you could do (and this has not been tried AFAIK) is to use a backing of ferrite ceramic, possibly a disk shaped ferrite magnet from an old speaker or from a microwave magnetron. Stick a ferrite rod through the center hole for added field focusing.
Back to top
w1vlf
Mon Apr 07 2008, 07:27PM
w1vlf Registered Member #1329 Joined: Mon Feb 18 2008, 07:31PM
Location: Harwinton Connecticut
Posts: 53
Hello Dr Shark, Yes... I forgot about the Eddy currents... I always thought that Eddy currents were only generated in Non-ferrous materials.
YThe other thing that made me think of this idea was that some folks have used ferrous pipe around thier coilguns to improve efficiency.

This is my first attempt at the launcher.

Have you ever stacked several of these coils ???

PauLC
W1VLF
Back to top
Dr. Shark
Mon Apr 07 2008, 08:32PM
Dr. Shark Registered Member #75 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
If by stacking you mean putting several layers of winding in series or parallel, yes, people have done that. This way you can tweak your coil for more inductance (layers connected in series) or less resistance (layers in parallel).
If you are somehow hinting at an arrangement with several stages of acceleration, thats kinda impossible to do since the disk would have to pass through all the subsequent coils.
Back to top
w1vlf
Mon Apr 07 2008, 11:32PM
w1vlf Registered Member #1329 Joined: Mon Feb 18 2008, 07:31PM
Location: Harwinton Connecticut
Posts: 53
Thanks again Shark, and yes I was thinking about the former. Also I would assume that the field increases with additional layers of coil?
If they are phased correctly??

Ijust launched my first aluminum disc!!!
WOW I was not ready for that
Havinf fun
PaulC
W1VLF
Back to top
Quantum Singularity
Thu Apr 10 2008, 12:25AM
Quantum Singularity Registered Member #158 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
Depends on how the coils are connected. If they are wound in parallel the layers basically act as heavier wire, the number of turns stays the same. You should get a stronger pulse due to lesser resistance. I've wound a coil this way, two layers, and did get increased performance using the identical setup with single layer coil. Good luck with your project, disc launchers are a lot of fun (and of course be safe wink .
Back to top
FastMHz
Wed Apr 30 2008, 05:56PM
FastMHz Registered Member #179 Joined: Thu Feb 16 2006, 02:08AM
Location: Hagerstown, Maryland - Close to Prime Outlets
Posts: 287
More layers are good to a point...I found my 3-layer coil was less efficient than my two layer designs. I usually parallel the layers. I think the distance from the bottom layer to the projectile on top results in large magnetism losses.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.