Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Bill G (64)
Overclocked (37)
Edi (31)


Next birthdays
09/21 Bill G (64)
09/21 Overclocked (37)
09/21 Edi (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

X-ray sensitivity of phosphors.

Move Thread LAN_403
Arcstarter
Fri Oct 29 2010, 09:48PM Print
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
I have been wondering what kinds of phosphors would fluoresce in X-rays. With phosphors that fluoresce in the presence of X-rays, it would be simple to make a simple fluoroscopic screen for fluoroscopy.

I am not sure what chemicals/phosphors that are fluorescent in whatever wavelength of light there are, and i have no money to buy such things. That being said, i do have a bag of phosphors from televisions, and i could easily obtain phosphors from a fluorescent bulb.

I know that TVs contain ZnS-based phosphors, but i am not sure about fluorescent bulbs. Are they virtually the same? Also, the phosphors from the TV i have are all mixed together... It would still fluoresce just as well, just with mixed colors, wouldn't it? Would either Phosphor fluoresce well enough in the presence of X-rays to make a fluoroscopic screen?

Edit: Aha, after even more googling, i found this study regarding "Evaluation of ZnS:Cu phosphor as X-ray to light converter under mammographic conditions". Link2

In the PDF, it states "This phosphor has never been used in medical imaging probably due to its moderate scintillation decay time. However, it may be suitable for non-dynamic medical imaging, due to its “green” emission spectrum, which is compatible with the sensitivity of many currently used photodetectors, and its high X-ray to light intrinsic conversion efficiency.", and that it performs adequately in the power range of mammography. So, it seems it may work, if the phosphors i have are similar enough to those the people in the study used. Scintillation decay time would be the least of my worries, especially considering i would not necessarily use it on anything moving (definitely not myself!)

Back to top
Wolfram
Fri Oct 29 2010, 10:49PM
Wolfram Registered Member #33 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
Older screens used in x-ray cassettes were based on CaWO4, while modern one are based on rare earth doped oxysulfides, most commonly Gd2O2S:Tb. These phosphors are far better at this than any phosphor you might be able to get cheaply in powder form. Getting a powder into a uniformly coated sheet might be a bit of a challenge too, to put it mildly.

X-ray cassettes are widely available on eBay (and they are dirt cheap, here Link2 is one for 4 dollars, and in lots they tend to go even cheaper, I've bought lots for around a dollar a piece). Each cassette contains two screens (except for mammography cassettes).

These screens are an order of magnitude better than anything that can be made at home without very expensive phosphors and equipment. Making a fluoroscopy screen yourself would be a bit like making toilet paper yourself, possible, but there are cheaper, simpler and better alternatives. Unless, of course you just want a challenge and not results.


Anders M.
Back to top
Arcstarter
Sat Oct 30 2010, 12:31AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
It is mostly just a challenge, yes :). I have 100 5"x12" green sensitive panoramic X-ray films, and the developer and fixer, so i will be needing a cassette, if i want to take good X-rays.

Not to mention, i am not sure if it is possible to get a cassette, due to the fact that my parents will not allow me buying off of eBay, because of someone stealing 3000 dollars from the credit card... It's a shame, eBay is the only way for me to get some of the things i will need :/.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Oct 30 2010, 12:18PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
A small British company, Phosphor Technology, stock a range of X-ray phosphors, including zinc-cadmium sulphides in addition to the usual rare earrth oxysulphides.

Link2

I am experimenting at the moment in the electrochemical deposition of thin ZnS films onto tin oxide glass, and will have more to say about it in a month or so.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.