Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 77
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Incoerent photodiode behaviour

Move Thread LAN_403
TheMerovingian
Fri Oct 22 2010, 07:35PM Print
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
I'm just testing BPV10NF photodiode (lighting it with his complementary 940nm led)

The led is powered by a 1.5KHz square wave and driven with 50mA of peak current, the led rise time is 800ns (1.6us measured). The distance is approximately 4 cm.

The phototransistor has 4pF (11pF at 0 V) capacitance and the load resistor is 47Kohm (ensuring more than 4,5V voltage swing at VDD = 5V) considering 4pF stray wire capacitance we get a time constant of 376ns. The rise time (10%-90%) should be 2.2 time constants = 826ns, taking into account the 800ns of diode fall time we should get 1.6us of photodiode rise time. Since i need 200ns resolution for a speed trap i don't think that the capacitance of the photodiodes and resistance of the load resistor will vary more than 20%, so the error should be less than 200ns.


BUT

measuring the rise time with a DSO, gave me an unpleasant surprise:

the fall time of the diode is 1.6us and the rise time of the photodiode is 18.7 us !!!!
how can be an order of magnitude different from predicted? Stray capacitances cannot be 40pF!!

this would give too much error even with 5% component tolerances (1us!!)

Waveform:
Link2


Any advices?
Back to top
Sulaiman
Fri Oct 22 2010, 10:07PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
What is the capacitance of your 'scope probe?
If you have a x1 & x10 probe try both settings
and see how much faster the x10 setting is.
Back to top
TheMerovingian
Fri Oct 22 2010, 10:23PM
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
It is a 10:1 Probe. The capacitance is 13pF, maybe is this the cause.. counting 2.2 time constants we get 1us. With this probe the rise time is 7us. Total capacitance must be: 7us must correspond to 2,2 time costants (rise time 10%-90%), so the time constant is 3,2 us. Since the load resistance is 47Kohm the total capacitance must be 67pF.

So:

15pF is the probe
4 pF is the phototransistor
3 pF are the wires (worst case estimation)

so the stray capacitance : 45pF, a lot!

but it is realistic, since reducing the load resistor doesn't help a lot (it reduces only the effect of the phototransistor).

Back to top
Shrad
Sun Oct 24 2010, 11:24AM
Shrad Registered Member #3215 Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
do you reverse bias it?

it speeds up the response time of the photodiode dramatically

you can read this small note here to get the principle : Link2
Back to top
TheMerovingian
Mon Oct 25 2010, 10:34PM
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
Yes, i use it in reverse bias configuration. Cannot figure out where the extra capacitance comes from...

For reliable speed measurements at 1Km/s i need the time constant to be less than 300ns
Back to top
TheMerovingian
Tue Oct 26 2010, 04:25PM
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
I reduced the load resistor to 22KOhm and added a LM393 with some hysteresys(10%) with the threshould slightly above VCC/2 , transforming a "slow" changing waveform in a sharp (with some delay though) transition from 0 to VCC. The delay between the LED turn off (1us fall time) and the action is about 750ns +- 100ns (faster when the beam is interrupted partially); so in an hipotetic speed trap the error would be only 200ns, only one count for my system, giving and error of 0,2% at 1Km/s with 10cm separation, quite reasonable. To investigate the effect of stray light i tested the system with a 40W fluorescent almost striking inside the sensor giving an envelope wide approx 250ns, making the error still reasonable.

I will use this system for speed trap
1288110334 14 FT99169 Ptdcmp1

1288110334 14 FT99169 Ptdcmp2
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.