If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #75
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
I guess the difference between IGBTs and FETs boils down to this: FETs use only electrons to carry a current, and because electrons are mean little critters, this leads to an on-state resistance dominating the losses. However, electrons are also swift, so once the gate is turned off, the whole thing is off, for all practical purposes. With IGBTs, there are both electrons and holes flowing through the junction, so there is a lot more stuff around to carry a current (should be only twice as much, really, anyone know the details on this?), so there is basically no resistance but just a diode drop courtesy of the additional junction. But once the gate is off, holes like to stay around, so there is this huge tail current which makes fast stwitching a pain.
So far so good. Now comes my question. Since a BJT works by the same priciple as an IGBT, it should also suffer from a slow switch-off tail. But there are lots of BJTs around which are good for 100s of MHz, so apparently they dont. Why is this, does the base current somehow fill up the holes quickly or something like that? And, most importantly, is there any switching device that would be good for a few 100A at 3MHz, e.g. as the active device for that handheld DRSSTC I am dreaming about every night?
Registered Member #15
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Joe,
A quick search on GOOGLE led to the following article which goes into a lot of detail of the differences between MOSFETs and IGBTs and BJTs and why affects turn-off time etc...
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
The difference between IGBTs and MOSFETs is "Conductivity modulation". As far as I know, in a MOSFET, the amount of electrons available to carry current is limited to a modest amount put in at the factory by doping. The designer can't just add more, or they would overwhelm the controlling effect of the gate electrode and the MOSFET would refuse to turn off.
In an IGBT, there are huge amounts of spare electrons that are normally stored out of the way and released as needed. If you like the analogy of an IGBT as a MOSFET paired with a BJT, then the "Base" current of the BJT represents the hordes of extra electrons getting pulled into action. There can be far more than "twice" as many active charge carriers than in a MOSFET.
By the same analogy, the current tail is caused by all those extra electrons taking a finite time to stop leaping around and go back to their hiding places. The current tail can be minimized by clever design, but the more you try, the more the IGBT becomes like a MOSFET in its current-carrying capabilities.
Registered Member #75
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
OK, that makes more sense now. I was reading a couple of App notes on IGBT vs. FET that came up on google, but I guess I just didn't read the right ones The one EVR links is much better, how the heck did did you ask google to have that turn up as the first hit?
Class E, definitely, I am actually playing with some class E stuff at the moment. But keeping up the class E conditions for a whole array sounds even more difficult! Anyway I think I might get away with a single MOSFET for my tiny coil, since the total duty cycle will have to be rather low anyway. Time will tell...
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.