If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1875
Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
So I was thinking about making a homemade capacitor with teflon sheets, and I found this site that seems good with plastic. However, checking their listing of properties, I found that their value for the dielectric strength of teflon is a bit lower than what other sources on the internet say. About 5x lower, actually...
Is this the right value or am I amiss on something? 285v/mil means I would need almost a quarter inch to hold off 60kV, which wouldn't shock me (well, the 60kV could), but the other figures I've read (1500v/mil) would suggest I would need a lot less thickness for such a voltage. Thanks!
Registered Member #1875
Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
I sent an email inquiry. The funny thing is that the density and tensile strength values they supplied match the values given on the same sites that list the dielectric strength being much higher. The material is white so I don't think there are any pigments involved. Otherwise, it seems like a great site for big DIY capacitors.
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Check your math grenedier. You mean 1524 V/mil, so get rid of that "k" in kV.
also, the ASTM 877 dielectric test method uses the dielectric "punch through" volts as the final point on thier "hold off" quantity. Sooo, the 1,524 V/mil number was just at or before breakdown. for a "real" usuable number in caps or wire insulation thickness you would take the 1,524 V/mil number and derate it, -10% if your feeling lucky, -30,-50% if you would like to be considered sane. But its a judgement call, based on you and your application, for a harsh application, youll need more derating. This "judgement" is why your seeing such a low number, and why others seem to vary, and why you cant find consistent standard numbers.
My advice would be too not get greedy, after you blow your stuff up, because you thought you could get a little more kV, you'll feel awfully stupid for awhile. I know I did.
Registered Member #1875
Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
Well, I was planning on charging them to 30kV with a DC supply and using in a giant tesla coil, so I thought the 60kV figure alone would be a large enough margin of error. I want about 100nF, so I know it's going to be heavy. The idea is to fill a big plastic box with oil and then push down metal plate+plastic plate alternatively into a nice stack, wired accordingly. I'm going to need wheels on this thing, but I don't want it to be too huge!
But because I want reliability, I'm going to go with the quarter-inch thickness, and just keep stacking until I get the right capacitance...
EDIT I just ran the figures and the amount of layers I would need would be prohibitively large and expensive...
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
ScotchTapeLord wrote ... ...The idea is to fill a big plastic box with oil and then push down metal plate+plastic plate alternatively into a nice stack, wired accordingly. I'm going to need wheels on this thing, but I don't want it to be too huge!
But because I want reliability, I'm going to go with the quarter-inch thickness, and just keep stacking until I get the right capacitance...
EDIT I just ran the figures and the amount of layers I would need would be prohibitively large and expensive...
1. To get maximum V with a thick dielectric sheet such as you propose, you had better use comparably thick metal plates with well-rounded edges. With thin foil, the peak electric field will be at the dielectric surface next to sharp-edged conductor, with magnitude depending more on the radius of curvature than on the dielectric thickness. Look where the disposable plates (in another thread) failed!
2. For a quick estimate of physical size requirement, figure the energy storage (in joules) of your intended capacitor, divided by the energy storage density of your chosen dielectric material (in J/m^3, it is proportional to dielectric constant and to the square of the operating electric field strength). For a sanity check, figure the energy storage density of commercial HV capacitors. Don't expect to beat that with a homebrew solution, but it should be easy to get within a factor of 10 and if you are good, within a factor of 2.
[edit] I think PTFE is not high on the list of plastics with high dielectric energy storage density. Isn't it a relatively low-E material?
Registered Member #1875
Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
It says it drops to about 2kv/mil at 10 mils, though. Generally, if something calls for a quote, I can't afford it. I'm considering getting a thinner sheet of polypropylene and lowering my voltage expectations...
Klugesmith:
That's good advice. I've scaled my expectations down to 20kV at about 90 nF... which is only 18 joules- I didn't realize how overboard I had gone with the voltage. I am planning on using aluminum sheets with smooth sanded edges. If a 942 is 2kv at .15uF, then that's .3 Joules, which would mean mine should be 60x bigger... Mine is going to be about 1383 inches^3 which is about 11"x11"x11" or just under a cubic foot... not including the enclosure. That's not too bad..... I just hope the 60 mil of whatever I use can stand the voltage stress.
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Klugesmith wrote ...
1. To get maximum V with a thick dielectric sheet such as you propose, you had better use comparably thick metal plates with well-rounded edges. With thin foil, the peak electric field will be at the dielectric surface next to sharp-edged conductor, with magnitude depending more on the radius of curvature than on the dielectric thickness. Look where the disposable plates (in another thread) failed!
Yeah this is a great point. Sharp points are always evil, in a cap.
maybe if you go to the trouble / expense of making a good cap you should use an e-field simulator. i cant figure out how to use them though.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.