Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 85
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

What is the right thing to do?

Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Tue Sept 07 2010, 03:04AM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
A transformer has a current rating, like 36vct @ 1.5A. I don't exactly recall, but I am guessing this is the current you can draw without exceeding a certain amount of voltage drop-out. Is it 10%?

Anyway, I am taking the 18v from the center-tap and rectifying it. Without any load is is near 25v. This goes to a 15v voltage regulator so I have plenty of headroom. If I draw more than 1.5A the voltage from the transformer sags, but I still have plenty of voltage for my 15v regulator.

So the question is what does the industry recommend for an adequate current rating for a transformer? Would it be adequate to draw 2 or 2.5A since I have enough voltage to meet the regulator's needs, or does one not do this because of excessive transformer heating, and possibly a shorter working life?
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Tue Sept 07 2010, 02:26PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
The transformer rating 36v @ 1.5A means exactly that. It will output 36 volts when you draw the full rated 1.5A from it's secondary. With less than the full rated current from the secondary the voltage will rise. How much it will rise above 36 volts depends on the transformer's "regulation" specification. If it is specified as 10% regulation (a fairly typical value) then the voltage can go as much as 10% higher than the full-load voltage when you remove the load completely.

The "over-voltage when lightly loaded" behaviour is due to leakage inductance (less than ideal magnetic coupling) in the transformer and the IR drop due to the winding resistance.

You typically wouldn't draw more than the rated current from a transformer winding for any amount of time as this is eventually likely to overheat the transformer. This is particularly so if it is already operating in a high ambient temperature and is quite a small transformer to begin with.

However, for a big transformer >1kVA rating (like pole pigs) there's so much iron and copper in there that it won't overheat quickly even with considerable over current. For instance if you draw twice the rated current the I²R heating will quadruple! But the transformer still has a thermal time constant that prevents it from overheating instantly. It may or may not burn out after several hours of overload though, depending on how over-designed it was to start with.

-Richie,
Back to top
ScotchTapeLord
Tue Sept 07 2010, 03:29PM
ScotchTapeLord Registered Member #1875 Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
But drawing half the voltage should mean that you could pull up to twice the rated output current without stressing the core, shouldn't it?

In that case it would depend on the secondary coil's wire thickness...
Back to top
radiotech
Tue Sept 07 2010, 04:12PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Geordieboy wrote :
The "over-voltage when lightly loaded" behaviour is due to leakage inductance (less than ideal magnetic coupling) in the transformer and the IR drop due to the winding resistance.

To expand this statement :

The unloaded voltage of a transformer secondary reflects the actual turns ratio of the winding, which is adjusted to provide the correct voltage after rated load is connected. The ratio is the only means of controlling the output voltage once the flux level of the core is set by primary turns. Current can limited by altering flux
paths.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Sept 07 2010, 05:03PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
The short answer;
If the transformer gets uncomfortably hot OR the voltage drops too much for regulation then you're drawing too much current, otherwise should be ok.

Are you using both sides of the center-tap?
i.e. full-wave using two diodes, one from each 'end' Link2
This will allow more current than half-wave.

You can use this Link2 applet to see variations. (I use it)
Check out the benefits of adding an inductor between the rectifier(s) and capacitor
Back to top
radiotech
Tue Sept 07 2010, 06:22PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Fullwave, 2 diode, CT connection is very wasteful in that the copper
loafs for half the time and the winding window, hence the core, has to be bigger. Your output voltage is only one half what the turns ratio could provide. The output current demands bigger copper. than
would needed for equivalent wattage with a full wave bridge.
Back to top
ScotchTapeLord
Tue Sept 07 2010, 06:32PM
ScotchTapeLord Registered Member #1875 Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
radiotech wrote ...

Fullwave, 2 diode, CT connection is very wasteful in that the copper
loafs for half the time and the winding window, hence the core, has to be bigger. Your output voltage is only one half what the turns ratio could provide. The output current demands bigger copper. than
would needed for equivalent wattage with a full wave bridge.

It's better than only using half the windings at all!
Back to top
klugesmith
Tue Sept 07 2010, 06:45PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
ScotchTapeLord wrote ...
But drawing half the voltage should mean that you could pull up to twice the rated output current without stressing the core, shouldn't it?
In that case it would depend on the secondary coil's wire thickness...
Yes, but only with your qualification "stressing the core".
Power loss in the core depends only on voltage, and establishes the transformer V rating.
Core loss actually goes down slightly as current increases, because that reduces the internal voltage.

Power loss in the windings (copper loss) depends only on the current, and determines the transformer A rating.

Transformers have no stress (or loss mechanism) that depends on the product of volts and amps, or on the true power delivered to a load.
A transformer operating at both its V and A ratings will have a tolerable temperature rise due to core + copper loss. Both loss mechanisms are nonlinear. Reducing current will allow hardly any more voltage. Greatly reducing voltage may allow a bit more A.

You -can- trade off V for A, within a given VA product, when you design the windings for a given core part number. For example, a transformer catalog could have 120V 10A and 240V 5A products, using the same core size but different tradeoff between wire thickness and number of turns.

You can also trade off V for A by using matched dual primary and/or secondary windings, which can be connected in series or in parallel.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.