Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 92
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Maximum mosfet voltage

Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Mon Aug 02 2010, 04:01PM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I am hoping GeorgieBoy, who has been very helpful, can answer this.

I have a mosfet that is rated for 900v. This means that the voltage across the drain and source should not exceed 900v (I am not considering margin of safety factor here). I am using a 240vac supply which I double to 480vac, and then convert to DC. This give a maximum voltage of 670vdc.

When the half-bridge is running, on leg conducts, and then the next. What I see when I probe across the load is a square wave with the peak equal to the DC input voltage. If I am using 100vdc I see a square wave with +100/-100 peak-to-peak.

I would like to think that the half-bridge could survive full voltage at +670/-670, but I am not sure. Each leg is only seeing a maximu of 670vdc which is under the 900vdc. Is there an overshoot that I could be missing, or am I safe?
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Aug 02 2010, 10:08PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
it depends on what load your diving. if its largly inductive, with high current, and high freq, then you should plan on seeing wicked waveforms. and if i were you i would use a variac to turn up the voltage, while you monitor it by o-scope, when or if you see bad signs (overshoot, cemf, and such) youll be able to see it, then start backing off. this way you can limit your transistor losses when they eat themselves, otherwise you may blow them by the dozen$ before you figure out whats wrong.

my above method, i use because you need to chracterise both the bridge you've built, and the load your driving, both can be unique, which leads to some factors being more important than others.

so without knowing what your using it for, i will cautiuosly say that 670vDC put into a 900 V MOSFET in to a mostly resistive load is probably OK, but you must be sure you have no excursions and or gate drive problems at your power/freq.
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Mon Aug 02 2010, 10:50PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
A half-bridge develops a peak-to-peak voltage across the load equal to the DC supply voltage. A full-bridge develops a peak-to-peak load voltage equal to twice the DC supply voltage. In both cases this neglects voltage drops due to device on-resistance and stray inductance, but these are typically small.

In either case the devices need to be rated for the DC supply voltage being used plus some safety margin for voltage overshoots at switching instants. So for similar rated devices the full-bridge develops twice the peak-to-peak voltage across the load when compared to the half-bridge.

Typically loads that are at least partly inductive give the best behaved switching waveforms with MOSFETs because they encourage freewheeling of the load current and soft switching of load current between diodes and switches.

-Richie,
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.