If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2422
Joined: Tue Oct 06 2009, 02:41AM
Location:
Posts: 85
Does it work to put several MOSFETs in series instead of using a single one with a higher D-S breakdown voltage? If so, is there a specific way to do this?
you can, some are avalanche rated for dong specifically this. that means they are rated for handling a certain amount of jolt (non tech term) since they might not switch at the same time
Registered Member #2901
Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
The term is snubbers ... they limit speed and waste power though.
An alternative is gate side techniques, there are passive ones for instance :
Also this one, I'm not too sure how well it works ... but it's worth trying out since you can do it without isolated gate drives :
And active ones, for instance the scheme I described in this post :
To use that for switching you would use a ramp guaranteed slower than the slowest device as input.
I've also seen papers just switch a stack of MOSFET simultaneously and not care about the consequences (supposedly the manufacturing variance of MOSFETs is pretty low). Or simply put MOV's across them. To me either seems better than snubbers. Not build any of these schemes yet though, just trawled the web.
Registered Member #1497
Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
The problem with putting mosfet's or IGBTs (or really any semiconductor) in series with the total voltage above its rated breakdown voltage is simultaneous turn-on.
Take for example, a 0v to 10kV rail with 10 mosfets rated at 1200V each, theoretically they should be able to stand off that 10kV just fine. If just 2 adjacent mosfet's turn on, the other mosfets are exposed to a greater voltage across them (10000/8 = 1250V). Once one mosfet breaks down, the next mosfet is exposed to even more, etc. You could put TVSs across each mosfet, or a small capacitor as a snubber, though you would have to compare the RC time constant of the cap + Rds(on) of the mosfet against the mosfet's turn on time.
I do recall that TDU made a stack of SCR pucks, and blew it up because of voltage standoff issues some time ago. You would also want to use some decent drivers for the mosfets (either with high side isolation and bootstrapping, or, a GDT and proper driver) to force fast, hard switching to prevent a mosfet from dieing and killing the rest of the stack.
Registered Member #2901
Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Hard switching is not necessarily the best way, the gate side techniques all keep the MOSFET in the active region so they can use feedback one way or another.
For hard switching the easiest way seems to use a transformer and simply use a larger output voltage than the threshold and connect it to the MOSFET through a resistor to limit current and a zener to limit gate source voltage ... avoids having to use any active components which will need their own floating power supply, which is a head ache.
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
If you make sure the turn on/turn off current is below the maximum avalanche current (which is typically the same as the DC continuous current), then this should work without snubbers. And of course you need isolated gate drive for each transistor...
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.