Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 77
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Are these IGBT's compatible in a bridge?

Move Thread LAN_403
Arcstarter
Mon Apr 05 2010, 08:39PM Print
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
If i wanted to make an H-bridge, in drsstc duty, with two of each of these two devices, would it work?

Link2
Link2

They are pretty dang different, especially in gate charge. My main worry is the rise and falls times. I am sure it is possible to use these, but you would need extremely accurate delays on the gates with precise measuring equipment, which even if possible would still be totally impractical.

But, i am not sure how big of a problem this is at around 65KHz. I am not even sure if these IGBTs would do 65KHz at 600 or so amps.

If it would work, how should they be connected? The same type on either side of the bridge, or each pair that conducts together the same type?

Thanks!
Back to top
cjk2
Mon Apr 05 2010, 11:18PM
cjk2 Registered Member #51 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:17AM
Location:
Posts: 263
The ST part looks fine. The IRF part is likely too slow. I would make a half bridge with two of the ST devices, or buy 4 60n60's, Digikey has them for $18 each.

EDIT: Oops, as has been pointed out, the times on the ST part are in uS not nS. Silly me. So yes, the ST part is likely too slow.
Back to top
ScotchTapeLord
Tue Apr 06 2010, 12:27PM
ScotchTapeLord Registered Member #1875 Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
The ST device seems much slower to me... those times are in microseconds! Though the IRF is rated for low frequency (1kHz), the delays don't seem worse than any common brick that people claim to be able to use to 100kHz...

I really don't know if the ST device itself is cut out for 65kHz at all, let alone mismatched with the other one... unless you have a ridiculously low Fres...

Generally, if you are unsure, it's best to take a different approach.
Back to top
brtaman
Tue Apr 06 2010, 03:50PM
brtaman Registered Member #2161 Joined: Fri Jun 05 2009, 03:36PM
Location:
Posts: 247
As has been said, the ST parts are horribly slow, I have seen 1000A power bricks with faster denoted switching times.:-O I would not run them at 65kHz personally, with their unbelievable long turn off and fall time, i would be iffy running them above 10kHz.

I would not mismatch the two, for a number of reasons, namely having both parts conduct simultaneously...boom. The entire turn of period of the ST is about 2x as long as the IR part, at the very least some serious dead time will have to be introduced, if you want to go ahead with the plan.

The IR part should be fine, especially since I suspect 65khz is your sec Fres, meaning your primary will resonate around the 50k area. That being said, the IR part is not exactly on the fast side of things, either. However, as has been mentioned on this forum, in several articles and power electronics books, IGBTs behave quite differently under resonant soft switching.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Apr 07 2010, 11:13AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I wouldn't touch the ST one with a barge pole! It's completely wrong for a DRSSTC type application.

(If the ultra-slow switching doesn't discourage you, the mention of a "latching current" in the datasheet should.)

It was probably designed for the output inverter in an AC TIG welder. That only has to run at a few hundred hertz, and the current can never get more than whatever the operator sets the welding current at.
Back to top
MinorityCarrier
Wed Apr 07 2010, 08:29PM
MinorityCarrier Registered Member #2123 Joined: Sat May 16 2009, 03:10AM
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 312
I'm not trying to hijack this thread, just given the subject, I am curious if Toshiba MG500Q1US1 IGBT's are fast enough for a DRSSTC.
Back to top
Wolfram
Thu Apr 08 2010, 06:05AM
Wolfram Registered Member #33 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
MinorityCarrier wrote ...

I'm not trying to hijack this thread, just given the subject, I am curious if Toshiba MG500Q1US1 IGBT's are fast enough for a DRSSTC.

They speed and peak current ratings are similar to those of the well known CM600HA-24H, so I think there's a very good chance they'd work very well in a big DRSSTC. Personally I wouldn't go much above 50kHz with them.


A.M.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.