Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 84
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
02/08 Mark-H (62)
02/08 Mates (47)
02/09 Zyrppa (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

coilguns...accuracy?

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Quantum Singularity
Tue Feb 14 2006, 03:47AM Print
Quantum Singularity Registered Member #158 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
Hello, I am new to this forum. A few might remember me from the Tesla List during the late 90's (aka The Mad Coiler). All my HV stuff has sat idle the last 5 years, but I am hoping to soon get back into things.

My first project, slotted for this summer if I can get my 'lab' cleaned up, will be a coil gun. I have been studying the web with vigor on this topic, and I am sure to have lots of questions here. But first I thought I would ask this. After days of reading websites, one thing I have not ever seen results of is a coilguns accuracy. Do we have any coil gunners here? Or has anyone heard of any reports on accuracy?

I have seen barrels that were loose fitting with the projectile, and guns with no barrels at all?!? And have read that the magnetic field will 'center' the projectile in the barrel anyhow, so I wasnt sure if more tight fitting or loose fitting would be better and what effect on accuracy they would have.

In any case I am curious to see if there are many gunners on this forum yet!
Back to top
Self Defenestrate
Tue Feb 14 2006, 05:45AM
Self Defenestrate Registered Member #87 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 01:36PM
Location: San Jose
Posts: 191
I'll take a step forward. Coilguns have plenty of accuracy if built carefully. The coil will pick up the projectile and center it within itself during the acceleration. Barrels are nice to keep the projectile from tumbling at low powers, or to align multiple stages properly, but also introduce friction on the projectile. As for aiming, I would often shine a laser pointer down through the coil to align it with a target. My coil at 200j was acurate to about a half inch around the dot at 26 feet. Not too scientific, but close enough.
Back to top
...
Tue Feb 14 2006, 06:37AM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
I an not sure how accurate coilguns are, but I would not expect it to be very high because the bullet has no stabilisation...
Most (it not all) guns today have a rifled barrel with spins the bullet with in turn makes it go strait; coilguns do not.

That said, with my 10j coilgun (using a 1/2" by 1/4" ferrite slug as the projectile) with a 4" barrel from a ball point pen would shot strait across the room, but I never did any tests on accuracy...
Back to top
Wilson
Tue Feb 14 2006, 06:57AM
Wilson Registered Member #78 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 11:27AM
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 133
Using a long barrel would improve the accuracy i guess. At around 10m, the projectile from my ball point coil never hits point first.
Keep in mind that although the deviation of the projectile left or right will not be high, the vertical displacement will be much greater, especially over long distances.
Back to top
TheMerovingian
Tue Feb 14 2006, 10:54AM
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
Since the final kinetic energy of the projectile is scarce (1-10J) we cannot waste it in friction with the barrel, even if it would improve accuracy but will lower efficiency.
Also the gravity works against us making the projectile fly in a parabolic trajectory (this happens alfo to gunpowder firearms).

Also the projectile thumbling can be cool and dectructive on the target (coke cans cut in half and so no)
Back to top
Quantum Singularity
Tue Feb 14 2006, 04:26PM
Quantum Singularity Registered Member #158 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
Hey thanks for the feedback here... I am already learning new stuff. Didnt consider the bullet may tumble, but a lot of force + poor aerodynamics = tumble. However the accuracy Self_Def mentioned sounds good to me. Half inch around the dot - guess that dpends on how big the dot is?

Vertical deflection is expected, thats a function of speed vs gravity and can be roughly calculated/measured. Its the consistency I am looking for... One of my goals is to build something that is 'usefull'. With a CG I think of usefull as maybe being able to shoot the squirrels of my birdfeeder in the back yard.

Since riffling a barrel of a CG is probably not something that is practable or even possible, I guess the only way to improve accuracy would be by having as perfect of coils as possible and focusing on the projectile. I think with a lot of machining a good projectile could be made, perhaps with fins (helical?) formed at the rear, but their stabalizing effect might be minimal at relatively low velocities.
Back to top
tecNik
Tue Feb 14 2006, 07:33PM
tecNik Registered Member #77 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 10:24AM
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 26
Maybe you could spin the projectile before it is accelerated by the coil/s. Anyone else with any ideas to improve accuracy?
Back to top
...
Wed Feb 15 2006, 12:21AM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
I remember someone adding a 'tail' on the back made of feathers or something... I am not sure how much it improved the accuracy but it did make sure it the target point first...

I wounder if you could make a pair of fins the diameter of the bullet, trailing behind it... Would there be enough airflow there to make it stable like a rocket? I would run a rocksim simulation, but it is not installed right now...
Back to top
Quantum Singularity
Wed Feb 15 2006, 02:45AM
Quantum Singularity Registered Member #158 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
Hmm, small fins on the back might work especially on a longer projectile. I wonder if you used a square barrel instead of round and put 4 fins on then the 'corners' of the square barrel would give the fins a little extra room. Plus if you used the right type of feathers they can compress real well and then spring out once the projectile is free from the barrel. Lots of things to try. Wish I had me garage cleaned out so I can start building.




Back to top
Dr. Shark
Wed Feb 15 2006, 02:21PM
Dr. Shark Registered Member #75 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
there is a fundamental difference between normal firearms and coilguns: with firearms, you want a big bore so there is some volume for the gas to burn, so you end up having relatively short and fat projectiles. With a coilgun, you want your projectile as long as the coil, so and you can make it fairly thin. Thus the idea with the fins is a very good, if not the only way to stabilize the projectile.

But should you not figure out how to give your coilgun enough power before you worry about accuracy? Normal coilguns with a few 10s of m/s muzzle velocity do not need to be accurate as the projecile just drops to the ground after a few meters :P
Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.