If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Please look at the following pictues
voltage measured at A: approx +15 to -15v voltage measured at B: approx +15v to -20v voltages at A and B with 150R resistor replacing mosfet GS junction: A +15 to -15v, B +10v to -15v
The schematic is is a resistor followed by a 5v zener going to the gate of a mosfet. A transformer going from +15 to -15 is driving the signal. The mosfet source is connected to ground. Now I expect the voltage to be 5v more at point A compared to point B. I also expect the positive voltage to show a difference and not the negative voltage. I have put voltage markers on the tracing so you can compare one with the other. Measurements were made with the positive probe at point A and B; the negative probe was connected to ground.
What I see is the voltage at A is 5v more positive than B. However, this is occurring on the negative cycle. A is -15v and B is -20v. The upper tracing of the square-wave is only affected by the standard diode voltage drop of 0.6v. What I expected to see was Apeak to be 15v, B to be 10v, and both troughs to be -15v. Another puzzling thing is how am I now getting the signal at point B going from +15v to -20v? My drive is only +15/-15v, and I have a -20v reading?
In the last picture I removed the mosfet and put a 150R resistor from the gate to source (ground). Now, the voltage at B is registering as 10v, A is 15v, and both are at -15v.
It seems to me the mosfet has properties that I am not appreciating. Can anyone straighten this out for me?
Registered Member #540
Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
I'd think the zener isn't functioning in the way that you want because you need some current flowing through the zener to have a 5V drop appear across it in the reverse direction. The gate of the MOSFET is pretty good insulator so you can't get a constant voltage drop across the body of the diode. I might have to draw pictures since I don't know if I explained it well enough... I'm not sure about why the -20V is there. I'm wondering how you are getting a square wave off the end of a GDT...
In A, I would expect the zener to drop 5V across it. In B, when the cap is discharged, it would behave similarly to A. C is what the equivalent would be once the cap has fully charged (if it has enough time to). I would expect to see 0V across the zener as there is no current flowing through it.
Connect your scope probes across the zener to see what voltages appear across it. The voltage across the zener in the reverse direction should only vary between 0 and 5 volts.
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
The diodes work fine. I made the measurement across points A and B, and I got the expected result. It is a square wave going from 5v to 0 (or real close) with A being 5v more positive than B.
The -20v must have something to do with the gate capacitance getting charged. Anyone want to chime in?
Registered Member #2463
Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
I looked at the datasheet for the FDH44N50 and it appears to be insulated gate device with low leakage and capacitance. How can the current flow through the Zener? They will have forward drop of about 0.6 V and reverse breakdown at the Zener's rated voltage, provided current is flowing. I have never seen a zener that works on nA.
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Is the MOSFET's drain connected to a powered up switched circuit? If so, the gate is probably being charged through the reverse transfer capacitance (edit: but anyway this is weird because the reverse transfer current should 'act' opposite the charging current). Try to power up just the gate driver and disconnect the drain/turn off the drain supply.
radiotech: The currents during gate charging and discharging are pretty big and should be enough to cause the zener drop.
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Dr. Kilovolt wrote ...
Is the MOSFET's drain connected to a powered up switched circuit? If so, the gate is probably being charged through the reverse transfer capacitance (edit: but anyway this is weird because the reverse transfer current should 'act' opposite the charging current). Try to power up just the gate driver and disconnect the drain/turn off the drain supply. .
I thought of this, too. The tracing is only the inverter drive circuit. The HV rail going to the drain is not powered. I am wondering if I can model the mosfet gate with a small capacitance and diode and see what happens.
I wonder if anyone can try to reproduce this on a breadboard. I am going to try to reproduce it with a function generator in order to take the gate drive out of the equation.
Registered Member #2463
Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Re gate capacitance; The data sheet says 5535 pFd. Ifthe frequency that diagram with the mosfet is operating t was 30 kHz gate-source AC current would be 0.016 amp. Dr. Kilovolt had a good point about gate/source C. Here are some tests using Mykes figure "B" with a 1n4723,5.6 volt in series with 4700 pF fed with Sine 30 kHz, and scope across cap, wave was distorted sin. With a 1K in place of cap, wave looked exactly like zener acting. with lower part down from 0 about .5 V and upper above about 5 V. However with signal changed to square, the zener acted like a 680 ohm R with the cap load producing a bit of rounding of the leading edge on top, and on bottom with diode reversed.No zener knee was seen with square wave.
The next thing is to find out why the 1N4723 acted this way, or if this experiment was flawed. The only thing is the original pictures seem to support the zener turning into a resistor with square wave current. I tried to magnify the image to better see the scope numeric readout.
I do hope to get the new digital cam into the shop and be able to post pics soon. As well there is a digital scope there needing some minor repair that can produce image files in CPM or DOS which might work on this notebook.
Registered Member #1232
Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
I think Dr kV is right. What you are seeing is probably due to the fact that the gate capacitance is effectively being resonantly charged through the GDT's leakage inductance.
When you add a 5V zener diode in series you are essentially letting the voltage on the gate wander by up to 5V relative to the output from the GDT before current will flow to correct it.
I'm guess this behaviour is what you want? ...otherwise you wouldn't have taken the rather unusual action of driving a MOSFET's gate through a series zener diode in the first place?
Regarding MOSFET gate capacitance: It's value varies massively depending on the instantaneous drain-source voltage, and also to some extent depending on the gate-source voltage. There is also capacitance between the drain and the gate that tends to cause apparent extra gate current to flow when the drain voltage is rapidly changing.
Modern Switched-mode MOSFETs are highly non-linear devices!
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
These are interesting thoughts KV and Georgie because I have been in my basement experimenting by adding capacitance and inductance. I took the basic setup: resistor, diode, mosfet
and found the tracing to be as expected. The voltage behind the zener was 5v less.
I then added a 125uH inductor in front of the resistor. I drove the test circuit with 45khz square-wave from a signal generator.
I found that this reproduced the excessive negative voltage that exceeded the generator voltage.
On the bottom tracing the most negative voltage is AFTER the zener.
I had tried combinations of capcitors on the breadboard, but this did not create the same effect, although removing the mosfet on the circuit board (not the breadboard) and putting a 0.01uf capacitor across the gate-source junction did result in the negative voltage after the zener to exceed in magnitude the negative generator voltage.
I saw this effect even after bypassing the GDT, so this effect must be from the stray inductance on the mosfet.
Is this behavior that I want? The voltage "ringing" isn't what I was after; it was the timing delay to ensure both mosfets weren't on at the same time.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.