If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I am hoping a few of you here can clear up a few questions. I have, for the purpose of the questions, a 10:1 step down transformer, and the primary inductance is 0.5H and it runs off of 120vac/60hz.
Does this mean that the most current it can consume, no matter how great the load, is 120vac/(2pi*60*0.5)? If the core saturates before this point, and I increase the number of primary (and secondary turns to maintain 10:1), will this drop the theoretical maximum current the transformer can deliver by decreasing its maximum current draw?
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
No.
If you measure the inductance of the primary with the secondary open-circuited, the result is called the magnetizing inductance referred to the primary. This determines the current drawn by the transformer unloaded, which is called magnetizing current.
What limits the output current is the leakage inductance. To see the leakage inductance referred to the primary, you would measure the primary inductance with the secondary shorted.
To a first order, saturation only affects the magnetizing inductance. Therefore, the output current of a transformer is not limited by saturation.
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3141
An 'ideal' transformer has infinite inductance for primary and secondary, real transformers have an equivalent parallel inductance (in this case 0.5H) which as Steve said represents the 'magnetizing' current. This current is 90 degrees out-of-phase with the input voltage so will not move your electricity meter/cost money. There is also some real power lost in the core due to magnetic hysteresis.
I agree that for hf transformers the output current limit is determined by the 'leakage inductance' but for practical 50/60 Hz transformers (low frequency laminated steel core transformers) the long-term output current is limited by heating of the wire/windings (P=I^2 x R) and the short-term current is limited by winding resistances. _____________________________________
__________________________ Commercial transformers usually operate close to saturation for economy, with an oscilloscope look at the transformer output with no load if it looks close to a sinewave the core isn't saturating.
If you have a Variac you can plot Vout vs. Vin ... worth doing at least once a lifetime.
If the core is saturating then you need to reduce the volts-per-turn, to get more turns in the same space you need thinner wire, with higher resistance (thinner and longer) hence it will heat up at lower currents.
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
So if a transformer was ideal with infinite inductance, magnetization current would be zero.
Now it is this leakage inductance that has me a little puzzled. If my transformer has an inductance of 0.5H, then the magnetization current is
120/(2pi*60*0.5) = 0.63A
right?
Now if I put a large load on the secondary, how is more current working its way through the primary past this inductor? The primary is an inductor with a set reactive impedance. Inductor primaries are even used as ballasts to limit current drawn on the line. So how come the coil's inductance is unable to do this when a secondary is linked to it?
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Magnetizing inductance acts as if it's in parallel with the load, and this is why it doesn't limit current. (It's Xm in the diagram linked.)
As you can see, the transformer model includes several inductances, so you can't say "the inductance of a transformer" without specifying which one you mean. The simplest model has two inductances, magnetizing and leakage, as we discussed above.
The answer to your specific question is that when a load is placed on the secondary, the secondary current creates a MMF that opposes the primary flux, so it can't travel around the core so easily. This causes more primary current to flow.
In the limit, with the secondary shorted, the flux can't pass through it at all, and hence can't complete a circuit of the core. The resulting primary inductance is now the leakage inductance, and since the core isn't doing anything, it's usually about the same as the inductance of the primary in air with the core removed.
Things that are in series magnetically appear in parallel electrically and vice versa. The "shunts" on a MOT or NST form a parallel path that the primary flux can take without passing through the secondary. So, it can still flow relatively easily, even if the secondary is shorted. This doesn't affect the magnetizing inductance, but it increases the leakage inductance.
Note, in the above discussion I assumed the windings to be perfect conductors with zero resistance, but for a decent-sized transformer, the resistance doesn't make much difference to the argument. In small transformers the resistance can make them behave quite differently.
Registered Member #2463
Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
The primary current will never exceed the voltage applied/primary resistance. The %Impedance is the percent of rated voltage needed to circulate rated current with seconday shorted.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.