Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 68
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Daniel Davis (54)


Next birthdays
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
05/29 Dr Hankenstein (68)
05/30 Quantum Singularity (47)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Difference between the near field and far field

Move Thread LAN_403
chadj2
Thu Aug 13 2009, 09:03PM Print
chadj2 Registered Member #2290 Joined: Thu Aug 13 2009, 08:15PM
Location:
Posts: 2
I am studying electromagnetic radiation. I am currently trying to understand some of the

differences between the near field or the storage field; and the far field or the radiation

field. I understand that power is transferred in the storage field such as in in the case of a

transformer with the magnetic field coupling between the coils. If you increase the power

output through the secondary coils, you will have more power drained from the primary coil in

the form of increased current flow. However, when it comes to the radiation field, power is

radiated rather than transferred such as in the case of a television transmission tower. It

doesn't matter how many television sets are tuned in to the frequency, the station doesn't have to

increase power to compensate. I have read that it is hard to determine exactly where the

radiation field starts to become predominant and the storage field stops, but my main question

is this. Is the radiation field a component of the storage field or is it completely seperate

from the storage field? Does the radiation field take from the storage field or is it a

completely seperate phenomenon having to do with a charge accelerating or decelerating? I know

this may be a dumb question but I am just curious if this has been addressed before. I haven't

been able to find the answer in my own search of books and the web.

Chad
Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Aug 14 2009, 10:01AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
If you think of it in terms of complex potentials, the storage field is the imaginary part, the radiation field is the real part. It's as simple as that. Power can't be transferred by the storage field: any time it's being transferred, there is a real component to the field.

The radiation field is not necessarily the far field, because EM power travelling through free space must have an impedance of 377 ohms. You can have radiation fields whose impedance is far from this, and they can't travel in free space. This is what happens in the transformer, Tesla wireless power, and so on. It's not a storage field (that would be the field associated with the magnetizing current) but it's not a radiant field either.

Paul Nicholson explains this by saying that the apparatus forms a cavity or waveguide with an impedance different to free space. For instance, when two Tesla coils are coupled capacitively, the field transferring power between them has a characteristic impedance of hundreds of thousands of ohms, on account of the high voltage and low current.

And yes, if you surrounded a TV mast with an enormous sphere of TV sets, they would absorb most of the power. smile You should read Nicholson's article on non-Hertzian waves.
Back to top
chadj2
Fri Aug 14 2009, 06:21PM
chadj2 Registered Member #2290 Joined: Thu Aug 13 2009, 08:15PM
Location:
Posts: 2
Thank you for your quick explanation. I will be sure to search for that source you recommended.

Chad
Back to top
WaveRider
Sat Oct 24 2009, 09:16PM
WaveRider Registered Member #29 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 09:00AM
Location: Hasselt, Belgium
Posts: 500
The difference between near field and far field is a bit of a fuzzy one. In a nutshell, whenever you have something with time-varying currents flowing on its surface, electric and magnetic fields are produced in the surrounding space. These fields exhibit two forms of behaviour. On one hand, the local "near fields" do not go anywhere...they look a lot like static fields and contribute to reactive power only; circulating around the structure. They typically die off as 1/r^2, 1/r^3, etc. as you move away from the current source. On the other hand, the radiation fields decay ar 1/r from the structure and contribute to power loss by power flow away from the structure. At a distance where the intensity of the radiation fields exceed the intensity of the stationary reactive fields defines the "far field" region.

Hope this makes sense...

Cheers!
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.