Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 71
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Energy from the sun and water.

Move Thread LAN_403
ShawnLG
Thu Apr 30 2009, 03:04PM Print
ShawnLG Registered Member #286 Joined: Mon Mar 06 2006, 04:52AM
Location:
Posts: 399
If this really works. It can eliminate our energy crysis and it's green.
Link2
Back to top
Plasma Lover
Thu Apr 30 2009, 03:31PM
Plasma Lover Registered Member #1911 Joined: Mon Jan 05 2009, 06:30PM
Location: Salem, Oregon, USA
Posts: 165
This is an impressive invention because it reverses the consumation of fuels used that produce CO2

But isn't it true that this simply consumes cobalt oxide that could be used for other industrial applications, while the methanol, when burned, releases the same CO2 back into the atmosphere? Also, isn't methanol considered a 'carbon-neutral' fuel, since it's created from plants and, since the plants have to consume carbon-dioxide to make the sugars, which then convert into methanol, which, when burned, releases the same carbon dioxide the plant consumed?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 30 2009, 03:55PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I wonder how much energy is needed for the mining, trans-shipment, refining, and synthesis of the cobalt oxide nanocrystals?
Back to top
Adrenaline
Thu Apr 30 2009, 06:04PM
Adrenaline Registered Member #235 Joined: Wed Feb 22 2006, 04:59PM
Location:
Posts: 80
Harry wrote ...

I wonder how much energy is needed for the mining, trans-shipment, refining, and synthesis of the cobalt oxide nanocrystals?

To expound upon that, I think the real question is the lifetime of the catalyst. Sure you need to look at the initial energy investment, but if the catalyst lasts for 1 million gallons of fuel, one would expect the net production of fuel to still be quite high.
Back to top
Bjørn
Thu Apr 30 2009, 06:22PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
But isn't it true that this simply consumes cobalt oxide that could be used for other industrial applications
They stated that it was a catalyst so it is not consumed in the process but it will suffer some degradation over time so it will not last forever.

while the methanol, when burned, releases the same CO2 back into the atmosphere?
Yes.

Also, isn't methanol considered a 'carbon-neutral' fuel, since it's created from plants and, since the plants have to consume carbon-dioxide to make the sugars, which then convert into methanol, which, when burned, releases the same carbon dioxide the plant consumed?
Methanol production on a large scale is usually done from natural gas. It is possible to create all fuels of this type in a carbon neutral way as long as you have access to energy to drive the process. There are both biological and synthetic ways to do it.
Back to top
Frosty90
Sat May 02 2009, 02:38AM
Frosty90 Registered Member #1617 Joined: Fri Aug 01 2008, 07:31AM
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 139
...I think the real question is the lifetime of the catalyst...

Also, how does the energy 'density' (correct term for enegy produced per volume/weight?), efficiency, cost per unit of energy etc compare with other already available solar technologies like solar panels etc?

Cheers,
Jesse
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat May 02 2009, 05:20AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
It's one thing to think about refreshing the degraded catalyst in a small panel, but the suggestion was made that this invention would solve global energy needs - petawatts and growing.

Vast quantities of cobalt ore would have to be extracted and processed, degraded catalyst collected and re-cycled by an entire global industry, huge energy farms would have to be established in areas with sufficient sun and water, and so on.

But, it might, I s'pose, provide one small strand of a multi-source approach to energy production, if indeed it works at all, and is suitable for up-scaling.

Back to top
big5824
Sat May 02 2009, 05:34PM
big5824 Registered Member #1687 Joined: Tue Sept 09 2008, 08:47PM
Location: UK, Darlington
Posts: 240
Im suprised sunlight has the energy to split the bonds to be honest, O-H bonds are pretty strong.

Im just waiting for the catch to come, such as this reaction can only happen above the ozone layer or something....
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.