Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 30
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Alessandro (32)
Andrew L. (33)
bwsparxz (51)
Bonehead (34)
Tetris (27)


Next birthdays
06/29 Wirenut (47)
06/29 Dieu (35)
06/29 M477i3win2 (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Multi-Stage coilgun

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
Camel
Sat Mar 21 2009, 03:18AM
Camel Registered Member #1694 Joined: Sat Sept 13 2008, 09:13AM
Location: Australia
Posts: 108
hotcrazyfruit wrote ...

Camel wrote ...

hotcrazyfruit wrote ...

killah573 wrote ...

Barry wrote ...

Spacing the coils in various ways won't have any effect on each stage's timing. Instead, I recommend building subsequent coils with progressively lower inductance to achieve a shorter LC time constant, which has the desired effect of shorter pulses.

You still need to compensate for flux density in the projectile. The flux in the projectile has to drop far enough so that the flux from the next coil will not cause it to saturate. Unfortunately, optimizing this aspect of the coilgun usually requires trial and error, unless you have a full list of material specifications for your projectile. With even spacing between the coils, the projectile can saturate, depending on your input voltage and specific coil design. It might be possible to simulate all of this in FEMM.
saturation is a GOOD thing. it means the projectile is recieveig electormagnetism. th thing with saturation, is there is a limit to it. which is why people build multi stage guns, to allow the projectile to de-saturate, before you re-satureate it.

ummmm no, saturation is generally a bad thing. The less energy absorbed by the projectile, the more efficient your gun will be. Have a look at a hysteresis chart for soft iron. You'll see the gradient is steepest as low levels of applied force. The idea of building a multistage coilgun is to apply small amounts of energy, many times over. The overall effect is much higher velocities than an equivalent single stage gun (which would waste lots of energy due to hysteresis losses).

ahh, i geuss i learn somethign new every day. lol. thanks.

aaah, I don't think I explained that very well.

H

Basically, the ratio between magnetic field strength and lines of flux through the projectile is not linear. An efficient gun will have maximum lines of flux through the projectile for minimum field strength.
Back to top
hotcrazyfruit
Sat Mar 21 2009, 12:51PM
hotcrazyfruit banned on 5/26/2009
Registered Member #1877 Joined: Mon Dec 22 2008, 02:03AM
Location:
Posts: 147
Camel wrote ...

hotcrazyfruit wrote ...

Camel wrote ...

hotcrazyfruit wrote ...

killah573 wrote ...

Barry wrote ...

Spacing the coils in various ways won't have any effect on each stage's timing. Instead, I recommend building subsequent coils with progressively lower inductance to achieve a shorter LC time constant, which has the desired effect of shorter pulses.

You still need to compensate for flux density in the projectile. The flux in the projectile has to drop far enough so that the flux from the next coil will not cause it to saturate. Unfortunately, optimizing this aspect of the coilgun usually requires trial and error, unless you have a full list of material specifications for your projectile. With even spacing between the coils, the projectile can saturate, depending on your input voltage and specific coil design. It might be possible to simulate all of this in FEMM.
saturation is a GOOD thing. it means the projectile is recieveig electormagnetism. th thing with saturation, is there is a limit to it. which is why people build multi stage guns, to allow the projectile to de-saturate, before you re-satureate it.

ummmm no, saturation is generally a bad thing. The less energy absorbed by the projectile, the more efficient your gun will be. Have a look at a hysteresis chart for soft iron. You'll see the gradient is steepest as low levels of applied force. The idea of building a multistage coilgun is to apply small amounts of energy, many times over. The overall effect is much higher velocities than an equivalent single stage gun (which would waste lots of energy due to hysteresis losses).

ahh, i geuss i learn somethign new every day. lol. thanks.

aaah, I don't think I explained that very well.

H

Basically, the ratio between magnetic field strength and lines of flux through the projectile is not linear. An efficient gun will have maximum lines of flux through the projectile for minimum field strength.
wow.that image really helps me visualize whats happening exactly when i hit the SCR switch. thanks again. lol
Back to top
Barry
Sat Mar 21 2009, 04:31PM
Barry Registered Member #90 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:44PM
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 301
Next time can you click 'reply' instead of 'quote'? We don't need one-line "thanks" notes in the first place (private messages are good for that), and we really don't need to fill the thread with repeated quotes as if it were an e-mail digest of random threads.

Thanks, Barry
To misquote Smokey the Bear: Only YOU can protect our forum's information density.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sat Mar 21 2009, 07:31PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Indeed. I'm locking this thread for the following reasons:

An all-time record depth of quote nesting.
Oversized images.
Use of the "xD" smiley.
Two spelling mistakes in a three-letter word.
Zero or possibly even slightly negative information density.

Hotcrazyfruit and rp181, please get your act together. (Edit: I made a mistake. rp181 did not even post in this thread. However I received similar complaints about the quality of his posts in other recent threads, so the warning should still stand.)
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.