Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 68
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
01/31 Mathias (41)
01/31 slash128v6 (52)
02/01 Barry (70)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Single Coil Alternating Current Gauss Gun

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Woodie
Thu Jan 08 2009, 10:05AM Print
Woodie Registered Member #1916 Joined: Thu Jan 08 2009, 09:50AM
Location:
Posts: 3
I didn't see this when I did a search for it, so sorry if this has been brought up before.

Ok, first we know that AC current is a sine wave. There is a brief period of no current when the wave is at 0. We know that coils make electricity. So instead of using many batteries of coils couldn't you use a single coil over the entire barrel?

My thinking is this. As long a there is a current through the coil there is a magnetic field. When the wave hits 0 the projectile can move past the part of the coil which was pulling it forward until it is closer to the next part where the charge begins to get strong enough to begin pulling it again. Rinse and repeat with the coil stretched to compensate for the coil going faster while the wave is not.

Couldn't you with this method make a fairly powerful coilgun from a single coil and power source? If so this would eliminate the need for all those switches, gates and large expensive capacitors.
Back to top
Backyard Skunkworks
Thu Jan 08 2009, 10:41AM
Backyard Skunkworks Registered Member #1262 Joined: Fri Jan 25 2008, 05:22AM
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 451
Because a traditional coilgun uses magnetic attraction, the force on the projectile will be more like |sin()|. So this method wont really do much good...
Also, where would you get something that can do several tens of kilowatts peak power AC? confused

The most likely outcome of this setup is the projectile either sitting in the coil or if the power is shut off fast enough, being ejected with little force.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Thu Jan 08 2009, 12:23PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
What you're describing is a linear, single phase, synchronous, reluctance motor.

This is on of these things that in theory could work, but in practice has a lot going against it. Energising the whole coil, with only one part of it doing any useful work is rather inefficient. The profile of the windings limits you to only one accelearation profile, which makes it very non-flexible. Multi-coil guns solve both of these problems by triggering several coils in sequence.

Prof Eric Laithwaite had fun with a 3 phase linear motor, his "magnetic river", but that worked best as an induction motor with a non-ferrous armature, which it levitated into the bargain. And he did have a multi-100kVA supply to play with. Wouldn't have worked nearly so well with iron, or absent the other 2 phases.

Back to top
Barry
Thu Jan 08 2009, 02:52PM
Barry Registered Member #90 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:44PM
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 301
Almost. The AC current is sine wave, but at any instant in time the whole coil experiences the same current. So you don't get a magnetic field to form a sine wave in space, only in time.

Also note that solenoid coils have uniform magnetic field inside the coil. Once the projectile is fully enclosed by the coil, there is no longer any physical forces upon it, so it's merely coasting whether the coil is energized or not.

You can accomplish what Woodie describes, all you need is a series of coils end-to-end which are energized with three-phase AC. Each coil has the appropriate phase connection to pull the projectile further down the tube. Now you have a linear induction motor.

This seems to be reasonably efficient. cheesey There is little power wasted while idling since energy is stored inductively and released on the next part of the AC cycle.

EF Northrup, who held many patents for induction heating, built some small models in the 1920s, and wrote a fanciful story about using this coilgun to launch to the moon in "Zero to Eighty". I saw some pictures of them dropping wrenches and small tools into the opening and having them fly away. Or am I thinking of Prof Laithwaite's coilgun? I forget.

Cheers, Barry
Have a Happy Electromagnetic New Year!
Back to top
big5824
Thu Jan 08 2009, 05:39PM
big5824 Registered Member #1687 Joined: Tue Sept 09 2008, 08:47PM
Location: UK, Darlington
Posts: 240
It will be hard to find an AC power source that can supply enough current, a mains line certainly wont cut it. I think your best option would be something like a compulsator....I guess they could supply the huge current needed as a sine wave.
Back to top
Woodie
Thu Jan 08 2009, 10:36PM
Woodie Registered Member #1916 Joined: Thu Jan 08 2009, 09:50AM
Location:
Posts: 3
@Dr. Slack: Couldn't you have a repeating coil gun using this model? As long as the power is a steady sine wave and you feed it ammo at the correct intervals wouldn't this then make it much more efficient? Most household AC is 60Hz which even at .5 or .25 that would still be considerable would it not? Also, why does it need multiple acceleration profiles?

@Barry: On the train of thought I obtained from my lack of sleep and reading Dr. Slack's reply, would you be able to use a switch or something to restart the current to create a repeater? I will read up on linear conduction motors in the mean time.
Back to top
Marauder709
Fri Jan 09 2009, 02:22AM
Marauder709 Registered Member #1895 Joined: Thu Jan 01 2009, 03:12AM
Location:
Posts: 22
Also note that solenoid coils have uniform magnetic field inside the coil. Once the projectile is fully enclosed by the coil, there is no longer any physical forces upon it, so it's merely coasting whether the coil is energized or not.

I don't think so Barry. An armature is in equilibrium when it is in the exact center of the magnetic feild. In the case of a solenoid, in the very center of the coil. The force exerted on the projectile becomes less and less (by an inverse square law i believe) the further it goes into the solenoid. If the coil's length is equal to the armatures length then I would agree with you. However, in the case of a solenoid whose length is quite long compared to the length of the armature, the feild will continue to accelerate the armature until it is in the center of the feild.
Back to top
rp181
Fri Jan 09 2009, 02:56AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
I agree with barry, There is a central region, not a central point. I just added it to the wiki today too =p

The magnetic field from the end coils wont reach all the way to the other side, when you reach the central region, the net force is zero.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Fri Jan 09 2009, 08:05AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Barry wrote:
So you don't get a magnetic field to form a sine wave in space, only in time.
Exactly, that's the problem with a single phase synchronous machine. It's only when you interact with a projectile that's already moving, *in the right phase*, that you get a net force. It's similar to the problem that old synchronous clocks had, they'd sometimes start backwards.

Woodie wrote:
... Also, why does it need multiple acceleration profiles?
It's not so much that you need multiple profiles because you need more than one, it's because you need to have it varaible to change it until it works, and then change it every time you change anything else, like the projectile mass, starting position, coil voltage, friction of the armature on the barrel, it's just not practical.

With a rotary synchronous machine, once it starts in the right direction, it pulls into the right phase, and it runs as a motor with the previous pulses ensuring that the armature is in the right place for the next pulses. With a linear machine, it's all got to happen correctly from the start, one pass through the barrel, everything's got to be right. It's why single stage guns are easy. Two stage guns can be made to work with fixed timing, but they're easier triggered. At least you can control the relative timing of the two coils, to set it up for your projectile, a degree of freedom you don't have with the fixed coil position, fixed frequency setup that is the subject of the thread. 3 stages and more really need armature-triggered timing. You just can't get a sufficiently repeatable position versus time for fixed timing for all the coils to contribute the desired forward force.
Back to top
Woodie
Fri Jan 09 2009, 10:34AM
Woodie Registered Member #1916 Joined: Thu Jan 08 2009, 09:50AM
Location:
Posts: 3
Ok, so the 3 phase AC linear motor is the best way to go about this.

@Dr. Slack: What if you used specially made bullets which are already in motion in the direction you want through tradition gunpowder and used the coils in assist to achieve higher velocities? Also, I don't think that would be much of a problem since you would try to find something that works and stick with it. I'm not thinking along the ideas of endless experimentation but of finding something easy to use and cheap enough that other people would want to use it, then if the idea works you could sell it and afford much more research then just soliciting people for donations for research (For example Northrup Grumman is trying to market their Firestrike battle laser system and if they can sell it in the future they will be able to do the R&D to sell smaller, cheaper, more efficient and yet more powerful lasers which could have commercial uses like literally carving rock to safely mine without needing explosives or megawatt power generators like the engines found inside the Abrams tanks)
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.