If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1916
Joined: Thu Jan 08 2009, 09:50AM
Location:
Posts: 3
I didn't see this when I did a search for it, so sorry if this has been brought up before.
Ok, first we know that AC current is a sine wave. There is a brief period of no current when the wave is at 0. We know that coils make electricity. So instead of using many batteries of coils couldn't you use a single coil over the entire barrel?
My thinking is this. As long a there is a current through the coil there is a magnetic field. When the wave hits 0 the projectile can move past the part of the coil which was pulling it forward until it is closer to the next part where the charge begins to get strong enough to begin pulling it again. Rinse and repeat with the coil stretched to compensate for the coil going faster while the wave is not.
Couldn't you with this method make a fairly powerful coilgun from a single coil and power source? If so this would eliminate the need for all those switches, gates and large expensive capacitors.
Registered Member #1262
Joined: Fri Jan 25 2008, 05:22AM
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 451
Because a traditional coilgun uses magnetic attraction, the force on the projectile will be more like |sin()|. So this method wont really do much good... Also, where would you get something that can do several tens of kilowatts peak power AC?
The most likely outcome of this setup is the projectile either sitting in the coil or if the power is shut off fast enough, being ejected with little force.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
What you're describing is a linear, single phase, synchronous, reluctance motor.
This is on of these things that in theory could work, but in practice has a lot going against it. Energising the whole coil, with only one part of it doing any useful work is rather inefficient. The profile of the windings limits you to only one accelearation profile, which makes it very non-flexible. Multi-coil guns solve both of these problems by triggering several coils in sequence.
Prof Eric Laithwaite had fun with a 3 phase linear motor, his "magnetic river", but that worked best as an induction motor with a non-ferrous armature, which it levitated into the bargain. And he did have a multi-100kVA supply to play with. Wouldn't have worked nearly so well with iron, or absent the other 2 phases.
Registered Member #90
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:44PM
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 301
Almost. The AC current is sine wave, but at any instant in time the whole coil experiences the same current. So you don't get a magnetic field to form a sine wave in space, only in time.
Also note that solenoid coils have uniform magnetic field inside the coil. Once the projectile is fully enclosed by the coil, there is no longer any physical forces upon it, so it's merely coasting whether the coil is energized or not.
You can accomplish what Woodie describes, all you need is a series of coils end-to-end which are energized with three-phase AC. Each coil has the appropriate phase connection to pull the projectile further down the tube. Now you have a linear induction motor.
This seems to be reasonably efficient. There is little power wasted while idling since energy is stored inductively and released on the next part of the AC cycle.
EF Northrup, who held many patents for induction heating, built some small models in the 1920s, and wrote a fanciful story about using this coilgun to launch to the moon in "Zero to Eighty". I saw some pictures of them dropping wrenches and small tools into the opening and having them fly away. Or am I thinking of Prof Laithwaite's coilgun? I forget.
Cheers, Barry Have a Happy Electromagnetic New Year!
It will be hard to find an AC power source that can supply enough current, a mains line certainly wont cut it. I think your best option would be something like a compulsator....I guess they could supply the huge current needed as a sine wave.
Registered Member #1916
Joined: Thu Jan 08 2009, 09:50AM
Location:
Posts: 3
@Dr. Slack: Couldn't you have a repeating coil gun using this model? As long as the power is a steady sine wave and you feed it ammo at the correct intervals wouldn't this then make it much more efficient? Most household AC is 60Hz which even at .5 or .25 that would still be considerable would it not? Also, why does it need multiple acceleration profiles?
@Barry: On the train of thought I obtained from my lack of sleep and reading Dr. Slack's reply, would you be able to use a switch or something to restart the current to create a repeater? I will read up on linear conduction motors in the mean time.
Registered Member #1895
Joined: Thu Jan 01 2009, 03:12AM
Location:
Posts: 22
Also note that solenoid coils have uniform magnetic field inside the coil. Once the projectile is fully enclosed by the coil, there is no longer any physical forces upon it, so it's merely coasting whether the coil is energized or not.
I don't think so Barry. An armature is in equilibrium when it is in the exact center of the magnetic feild. In the case of a solenoid, in the very center of the coil. The force exerted on the projectile becomes less and less (by an inverse square law i believe) the further it goes into the solenoid. If the coil's length is equal to the armatures length then I would agree with you. However, in the case of a solenoid whose length is quite long compared to the length of the armature, the feild will continue to accelerate the armature until it is in the center of the feild.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Barry wrote:
So you don't get a magnetic field to form a sine wave in space, only in time.
Exactly, that's the problem with a single phase synchronous machine. It's only when you interact with a projectile that's already moving, *in the right phase*, that you get a net force. It's similar to the problem that old synchronous clocks had, they'd sometimes start backwards.
Woodie wrote:
... Also, why does it need multiple acceleration profiles?
It's not so much that you need multiple profiles because you need more than one, it's because you need to have it varaible to change it until it works, and then change it every time you change anything else, like the projectile mass, starting position, coil voltage, friction of the armature on the barrel, it's just not practical.
With a rotary synchronous machine, once it starts in the right direction, it pulls into the right phase, and it runs as a motor with the previous pulses ensuring that the armature is in the right place for the next pulses. With a linear machine, it's all got to happen correctly from the start, one pass through the barrel, everything's got to be right. It's why single stage guns are easy. Two stage guns can be made to work with fixed timing, but they're easier triggered. At least you can control the relative timing of the two coils, to set it up for your projectile, a degree of freedom you don't have with the fixed coil position, fixed frequency setup that is the subject of the thread. 3 stages and more really need armature-triggered timing. You just can't get a sufficiently repeatable position versus time for fixed timing for all the coils to contribute the desired forward force.
Registered Member #1916
Joined: Thu Jan 08 2009, 09:50AM
Location:
Posts: 3
Ok, so the 3 phase AC linear motor is the best way to go about this.
@Dr. Slack: What if you used specially made bullets which are already in motion in the direction you want through tradition gunpowder and used the coils in assist to achieve higher velocities? Also, I don't think that would be much of a problem since you would try to find something that works and stick with it. I'm not thinking along the ideas of endless experimentation but of finding something easy to use and cheap enough that other people would want to use it, then if the idea works you could sell it and afford much more research then just soliciting people for donations for research (For example Northrup Grumman is trying to market their Firestrike battle laser system and if they can sell it in the future they will be able to do the R&D to sell smaller, cheaper, more efficient and yet more powerful lasers which could have commercial uses like literally carving rock to safely mine without needing explosives or megawatt power generators like the engines found inside the Abrams tanks)
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.