Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 120
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
09/29 Ultra7 (54)
09/29 uitvinderalex (36)
09/30 Terrorhertz (15)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Hollow projectiles?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
mogallin
Thu Jan 01 2009, 04:17PM Print
mogallin Registered Member #1883 Joined: Thu Dec 25 2008, 01:58PM
Location:
Posts: 15
I heard somewhere that inside a conductor, at least if it is hollow, the will be no magnetic field and all charge will be on the outside. If this is the way it is, would it mean that a hollow projectile will be pulled towards the magnetic field just as good as a solid projectile?
Back to top
rp181
Thu Jan 01 2009, 04:20PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
look at what i found:
Link2
Back to top
Barry
Thu Jan 01 2009, 05:58PM
Barry Registered Member #90 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:44PM
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 301
Yes, hollow and irregular projectiles are pulled towards the magnetic field exactly like solid regular projectiles. As far as the forces involved from magnetism go, the shape is irrelevant.

But for other considerations, the general shape is fairly important. I'm still really struggling with a 'final' answer but I have learned a few things along the way...

A long object works better than a very short one. The reason is that shorter objects need a faster pulse than long ones, and designing a very fast discharge is more difficult and stresses parts more than a long pulse.

A thicker rod can absorb more energy than a thin pin or nail. The reason is that the larger cross-section will magnetically saturate at higher applied field strength.

Aerodynamics are a big factor. For flight stability we need the center of pressure to be located behind the center of mass. Or spin-stabilize the projectile.

Round conductive objects will suffer eddy currents, so it's beneficial to have a longitudinal break in the skin.

The bottom line ... exit velocity depends on the summation of the force on projectile at each point as it moves through the coil, which in turn depends on the instantaneous current and the 3d projectile shape. So the waveform of the discharge has to be factored in. Not a simple problem. So I take a simple approach by whacking off lengths of 1/4" welding rod and fire away.

I hope others add to this list!

Happy New Year
Barry screeches to a stop, reaches over to open the door and roughly pushes 2008 to the curb. Then he drives away.
Back to top
rp181
Thu Jan 01 2009, 06:05PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
Spin stabilization probably wont work on most coilgun's, the low speed will made it difficult to spin (by means of rifling).
Back to top
mogallin
Thu Jan 01 2009, 07:41PM
mogallin Registered Member #1883 Joined: Thu Dec 25 2008, 01:58PM
Location:
Posts: 15
Didn't quite get all of that...

But iI did understand some of it. Thanks!
Back to top
CyrusTheGreat
Thu Jan 01 2009, 07:55PM
CyrusTheGreat Registered Member #537 Joined: Sun Feb 18 2007, 07:22PM
Location:
Posts: 10
I've tried using a hollow projectile, but it didn't turn out so well. The efficiency and kinetic energy were crud. However, it did go pretty fast because of the reduced mass. I imagine that if I had used a thicker projectile with a smaller hole in the middle it would have worked better.

Cheers!
Back to top
Turkey9
Fri Jan 02 2009, 02:39AM
Turkey9 Registered Member #1451 Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
I also tried a hollow projectile on my six stage cg. The velocity went up, but the energy stayed about the same so there was still the same efficiency. My cg was pretty low energy per stage so the projectile didn't come close to saturation so i don't know if that was a factor. The hollow projectile did make a nice whistling sound when it was fired smile!
Back to top
blackgrunge
Fri Jan 02 2009, 06:27PM
blackgrunge Registered Member #1889 Joined: Mon Dec 29 2008, 07:36AM
Location:
Posts: 55
To answer Barry's question and give an explanation for why some people would be seeing improvements is that your not only picking up the force of attraction but also of repulsion. As everyone knows eddy currents cause a projectile to emit an EM field that repels it from the coils, thus the reason for eddy currents being bad (and that it wastes energy). This idea can be seen if you have a hollow copper cylinder and but it slightly of center of a coil and pulse a current through it. The change in voltage induces eddy currents in the copper ring and causes it to produce a magnetic field that repels the one being created by the coil. The reason that people may be picking up some extra velocity when using a ferromagnetic ring or hollow cylinder is that when the projectile leaves the coil the capacitors aren't done completely discharging and the inductor is still producing a magnetic field. In doing so eddy currents are created in the ring and it is pushed away from the coil as well as pulled at first by the coil.
Back to top
rp181
Fri Jan 02 2009, 06:29PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
He said the energy output was about the same, So i am thinking it was just a normal trade off between mass and speed.
Arn't slots is projectiles supposed to lower eddy currents?
Back to top
blackgrunge
Tue Jan 06 2009, 10:22PM
blackgrunge Registered Member #1889 Joined: Mon Dec 29 2008, 07:36AM
Location:
Posts: 55
He's not talking about slotted, he's talking about hollow. The reason that the energy outputs were about the same is because the force he lost in the attraction portion of it was then picked up in the gain repulsive forces due to eddy currents. If he were to do this on a much larger scale he would realize that more and more energy would be lost because he would be losing a lot more attractive force and the resistance and the inductance of the hollow projectile would waste the repulsive energy necessary to balance things out again. A better way to think about it is the difference between the attractive impulse and the repulsive impulse becomes greater and greater as magnetic field strength increases.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.