If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1883
Joined: Thu Dec 25 2008, 01:58PM
Location:
Posts: 15
I heard somewhere that inside a conductor, at least if it is hollow, the will be no magnetic field and all charge will be on the outside. If this is the way it is, would it mean that a hollow projectile will be pulled towards the magnetic field just as good as a solid projectile?
Registered Member #90
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:44PM
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 301
Yes, hollow and irregular projectiles are pulled towards the magnetic field exactly like solid regular projectiles. As far as the forces involved from magnetism go, the shape is irrelevant.
But for other considerations, the general shape is fairly important. I'm still really struggling with a 'final' answer but I have learned a few things along the way...
A long object works better than a very short one. The reason is that shorter objects need a faster pulse than long ones, and designing a very fast discharge is more difficult and stresses parts more than a long pulse.
A thicker rod can absorb more energy than a thin pin or nail. The reason is that the larger cross-section will magnetically saturate at higher applied field strength.
Aerodynamics are a big factor. For flight stability we need the center of pressure to be located behind the center of mass. Or spin-stabilize the projectile.
Round conductive objects will suffer eddy currents, so it's beneficial to have a longitudinal break in the skin.
The bottom line ... exit velocity depends on the summation of the force on projectile at each point as it moves through the coil, which in turn depends on the instantaneous current and the 3d projectile shape. So the waveform of the discharge has to be factored in. Not a simple problem. So I take a simple approach by whacking off lengths of 1/4" welding rod and fire away.
I hope others add to this list!
Happy New Year Barry screeches to a stop, reaches over to open the door and roughly pushes 2008 to the curb. Then he drives away.
Registered Member #537
Joined: Sun Feb 18 2007, 07:22PM
Location:
Posts: 10
I've tried using a hollow projectile, but it didn't turn out so well. The efficiency and kinetic energy were crud. However, it did go pretty fast because of the reduced mass. I imagine that if I had used a thicker projectile with a smaller hole in the middle it would have worked better.
Registered Member #1451
Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
I also tried a hollow projectile on my six stage cg. The velocity went up, but the energy stayed about the same so there was still the same efficiency. My cg was pretty low energy per stage so the projectile didn't come close to saturation so i don't know if that was a factor. The hollow projectile did make a nice whistling sound when it was fired !
Registered Member #1889
Joined: Mon Dec 29 2008, 07:36AM
Location:
Posts: 55
To answer Barry's question and give an explanation for why some people would be seeing improvements is that your not only picking up the force of attraction but also of repulsion. As everyone knows eddy currents cause a projectile to emit an EM field that repels it from the coils, thus the reason for eddy currents being bad (and that it wastes energy). This idea can be seen if you have a hollow copper cylinder and but it slightly of center of a coil and pulse a current through it. The change in voltage induces eddy currents in the copper ring and causes it to produce a magnetic field that repels the one being created by the coil. The reason that people may be picking up some extra velocity when using a ferromagnetic ring or hollow cylinder is that when the projectile leaves the coil the capacitors aren't done completely discharging and the inductor is still producing a magnetic field. In doing so eddy currents are created in the ring and it is pushed away from the coil as well as pulled at first by the coil.
Registered Member #1062
Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
He said the energy output was about the same, So i am thinking it was just a normal trade off between mass and speed. Arn't slots is projectiles supposed to lower eddy currents?
Registered Member #1889
Joined: Mon Dec 29 2008, 07:36AM
Location:
Posts: 55
He's not talking about slotted, he's talking about hollow. The reason that the energy outputs were about the same is because the force he lost in the attraction portion of it was then picked up in the gain repulsive forces due to eddy currents. If he were to do this on a much larger scale he would realize that more and more energy would be lost because he would be losing a lot more attractive force and the resistance and the inductance of the hollow projectile would waste the repulsive energy necessary to balance things out again. A better way to think about it is the difference between the attractive impulse and the repulsive impulse becomes greater and greater as magnetic field strength increases.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.