Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 23
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Alessandro (32)
Andrew L. (33)
bwsparxz (51)
Bonehead (34)
Tetris (27)


Next birthdays
06/29 Wirenut (47)
06/29 Dieu (35)
06/29 M477i3win2 (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Designing 2kW electromagnet

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
cduma
Fri Nov 21 2008, 08:11PM Print
cduma Registered Member #1822 Joined: Fri Nov 21 2008, 08:04PM
Location:
Posts: 300
This may not be the correct forum but, I think it fits here best.

My basic question is this: What is the best way to build a very strong electromagnet.

The only purpose I have is just to amaze friends with an electromagnet stronger than they are.

What I was going to do is use a heater as a load and have several rectifyers connected to a capacitor in parelel with an electromagnet. This would all operate at 120v.

What are the best dimensions for the electromagnet itself? Do I need to rectify the current?
Back to top
...
Fri Nov 21 2008, 09:18PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
I would skip the heater ballast in series and just use fine enough wire so that it has enough resistance on its own, and add a bridge rectifier+smoothing cap. For added fun add a switch that lets you switch it over to strait AC into the magnet and use it for all sorts of levitating tricks. Although keep in mind that a 2kw magnet is going to need 2kw of cooling, which will at the very least mean a lot of water flowing through it.

Also, you will want to put that on some kind of core (probably a C core, although an I core would work) to help organize the field.

And finally, where did you come up with the 2kw number? You really don't need that much juice to make a strong magnet. TeslaDownUnder has made some very impressive magnets that run well under 500w (on this forum and on his site)
Back to top
cduma
Fri Nov 21 2008, 10:00PM
cduma Registered Member #1822 Joined: Fri Nov 21 2008, 08:04PM
Location:
Posts: 300
I choose the number through a very complicated process that no body will ever hope to under stand. I choose a random number. It is true though, no body understands how the mind works.

I love sarcasm

The reason I wanted a ballest was so that I could use large wire and not need exotic cooling. Besides, I always wanted to make a contraption out of a toaster!

I want the electromagnet to be stronger enough to exert 130 lbs of force.

And what do you mean by "levitating tricks". That sounds alot better than a strong magnet.

Friend," Oh thats neat you built a stong magnet. Lets go watch TV"
Or
Friend,"OMFG that is the most awesome thing ever! Its floating in the air! Lets go take over the world." at which point I
would say," Thats immoral besides this world is lame and I dont want it."
Back to top
rp181
Sat Nov 22 2008, 01:11AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
A simple electromanget wont make objects float. You need to incorporate power control. 1.5kW will be a more reasonable figure, most house fuse's can handle that (if your in 120v land). Use ohms law (current= volt/ohm) to find wire length and AWG. This gives a figure of .1ohms (to be on the safe side).
Look at wikipedia's table of AWG (search for the AWG listing). Its shows a current rating and resistance, find a good combo.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sat Nov 22 2008, 07:54AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
The reason I wanted a ballest was so that I could use large wire and not need exotic cooling.


If you use large wire, then you have few turns, and a weak magnet.

Basically the more power loss in your copper wire, the stronger the magnet.
Back to top
...
Sat Nov 22 2008, 04:54PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
Yes a simple electromagnet can make things float, it can even make non-magnetic float through induction. See TDU's maglev disk Link2 (although understand that you need to keep something to keep the target sliding off since it is an unstable system).

Also, your plan to use a ballast to absorb the heat is not going to work. As said before, the strength of a magnet (for a given type of wire) is pretty much proportional to how much heat it burns. You can use a few thick turns and run it at super high current, or use a ton of thin wire and run it at lower current, but the strength of the magnetic field will always end up being about the same strength for the amount of power you burn up (with the exception being for magnets wound with superconductors and the like)
Back to top
uzzors2k
Sat Nov 22 2008, 11:04PM
uzzors2k Registered Member #95 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:57PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 1308
We should maybe clarify that it's the amount of turns and current that gives magnetic force, and not the actual power lost in the electromagnet.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sun Nov 23 2008, 08:49AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
We should maybe clarify that it's the amount of turns and current that gives magnetic force, and not the actual power lost in the electromagnet


OK, if you replace the copper with silver or superconductor and the losses reduce.

For the material constants of copper, it doesn't matter whether you use 100 turns of x diameter wire, or 10000 turns of x/10 dia wire on the same coilform, the field is poroprtional to sqrt(watts).
Back to top
aonomus
Sun Nov 23 2008, 08:02PM
aonomus Registered Member #1497 Joined: Thu May 22 2008, 05:24AM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 801
More turns = greater resistive losses = more heat

Perhaps even consider working in some way to cool it. Tesla Down Under made a gigantic kW scale one and had to air cool the thing.
Back to top
Electroholic
Sun Nov 23 2008, 08:18PM
Electroholic Registered Member #191 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 02:01AM
Location: Esbjerg Denmark
Posts: 720
its not about power, its about how you couple it.
my HS physics teacher once showed me a hockey puck sized electromagnet. It was powered by a single D cell and was impossible to separate by hand.
It think it was just some ferrite pot cores.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.