Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 27
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Gavin (49)
Froskoy (33)
UnHappy1 (59)


Next birthdays
07/16 Gavin (49)
07/16 Froskoy (33)
07/16 UnHappy1 (59)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Relativity and Kinetic Energy

Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Sun Mar 26 2006, 02:13AM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I was looking at derivations of the kinetic energy and energy/mass equation. Both seem to be derived from the same formula and my question is how is this true?
First, the energy/mass derivation:

F = M*A = M*(s/t)/t
W = F*s
Therefore, E = W = s*M*(s/t)/t
E = M*s^2/t^2
Since (s/t) = v we have
E = M*v^2 and for v = c we have E=M*C^2

Now, we derive the Kinetic energy equation

a =dv/dt = (dv/ds)*(ds/dt) = v*dv/ds

W = E = Integral(F*ds) = Integral(m*a*ds)
E = Integral(m*v*dv/ds)*ds
E = Integral(m*v*dv)
E = (1/2) * M*v^2

Both methods seem right; yet, they yield different results. There must be some assumption that allows both to be correct - one for v = c and the other for v << c. Anyone want to shed some light on this?

EDIT:
I believe I figured it out while I was taking a shower. In the world of kinetic energy, the initial velocity is zero so the total energy involved the average of the initial velocity and final velocity. This results in the 1/2 factor. In the world of light-speed, the velocity is always "c" and there is no averaging. This is the reason for the difference.
Back to top
Simon
Sun Mar 26 2006, 06:19AM
Simon Registered Member #32 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 08:58AM
Location: Australia
Posts: 549
In relativity, accelerating something increases its mass. The second derivation doesn't take that into account.

For anything with mass, v never equals c.

To know whether you need to use relativistic theory, or whether simple Newtonian stuff will do, calculate gamma. Y = sqrt(1 / (1 - (v/c) ^ 2)). (That Y is meant to be a greek gamma.) This number is the factor by which relativity does its weirdness. For example, if gamma is 2, time, space, mass, etc will be scaled by a factor of two. If gamma is close to 1, use Newtonian theory.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.