Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 72
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Very old Multimeter repair

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Nik
Mon Oct 06 2008, 09:38PM Print
Nik Registered Member #53 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:31AM
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 638
I picked up a "Superior Instruments Co." Multimeter "model 710" for 10$ at the shop down the street. Unfortunately it does not read voltages (AC or DC) correctly. DC voltages read much higher then the actual voltage and AC voltages read slightly lower then their actual voltage. I am fairly sure that the galvanometer's full scale deflection has changed because I used my digital meter to check voltage drops across the galvo and the current limiting resistors and all the readings made sense.

Heres where I need your help to tell me if I am going about this the right way. I am going to find the current required to make a full scale deflection then calculate the resistance required for each of the voltage ranges in order to make make the max voltage of each range pass the full scale deflection current though the galvo. If any one sees a problem with this method or knows an easier one let me know.

All the components inside the meter are resistors and switches (other then 1 mystery part that is not apart of the DC voltage reading circuit) which makes me think this is a doable project.
1223329123 53 FT0 Multimeter
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Tue Oct 07 2008, 05:51AM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
I would statr by checking that it's repeatable and linear.
It's never going to be as good as it once was but the idea you have seems OK.
Back to top
Bamacoiler
Tue Oct 07 2008, 11:52AM
Bamacoiler Registered Member #1628 Joined: Wed Aug 06 2008, 08:48PM
Location: Huntsville, AL USA
Posts: 95
I agree fully. That's about the best way I can think of as well.
Back to top
Nik
Tue Oct 07 2008, 09:39PM
Nik Registered Member #53 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:31AM
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 638
Thanks for your input, I like to check before I start work.

I measured the voltage required for full deflection to be 62.5mV, with an internal resistance of 150ohms that gives me a full deflection current ot 1/2400A (0.00041666A).

Crunching the numbers ive worked out the resistances required for each of the voltage ranges in order to get full deflection as follows (including the resistance of the galvanometer)

15v scale = 36kohm
60v scale = 144kohm
150v scale = 360kohm
300v scale = 720kohm
600v scale = 1.44Mohm
1500v scale = 3.6Mohm


Once I get the resistors I'll start the math on the Ohmeter circuit and Ameter circuit.
1223415595 53 FT55227 Multimeterinternal


EDIT, Made a typo its 62.5mV not mA for full deflection.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Oct 08 2008, 08:35AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
The FSD of the meter should be equal to the FSD of the unit's most sensitive DC current range, since that's what that is: the meter is just connected straight to the terminals with no other components in the way. It should be a nice round number like 1mA, 500uA, or if you're really lucky, 50uA, which is what the old Avo Model 8s had.

Sensitivity was also often quoted in ohms per volt. So the Avo Model 8 had 20,000 ohms per volt. (50 microsomethings = 1/20,000) You multiplied that by the voltage range you were set to, to get the actual input resistance, which was important in those days, since it was low enough to load tube circuits down.

The resistors have probably drifted with age, and the "mystery component" (probably a copper oxide rectifier for the AC ranges) might well be leaking too.
Back to top
Nik
Thu Oct 09 2008, 02:02AM
Nik Registered Member #53 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:31AM
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 638
I started to work out the resistance needed for the ameter and ohmeter sections of my meter and I think I may have hit a problem. The scale printed on the galvo was made for a galvo that was ~1mA for full scale deflection. But since the spring has become weak and it only takes 416uA to full deflection I don't think the scale will be usable or anywhere near accurate even if I replace all the resistors and set my own supply voltage. sad
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Thu Oct 09 2008, 05:50AM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
That makes it easy. You just need to shunt the galvo with a resistance of a bit less than 150 Ohms.
Back to top
Bamacoiler
Thu Oct 09 2008, 12:50PM
Bamacoiler Registered Member #1628 Joined: Wed Aug 06 2008, 08:48PM
Location: Huntsville, AL USA
Posts: 95
As a calibration technician, I'm sorry but if the full scale changed from 1ma to 416 micro that meter will never work right again unless you replace the meter. Even then I doubt still. I think you are probably wasting your time trying to get that working. sad How are you determining what full scale deflection is? Are you using a calibrated current source? Good luck and keep us updated.
Back to top
Nik
Thu Oct 09 2008, 06:09PM
Nik Registered Member #53 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:31AM
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 638
Even if I only get the Volt meter working close to accurate I will be happy, Really I just want it for show. I determined the FSD by putting a voltage across it until the needle deflected all the way, then i measured the voltage 62.5mV and calculated the current using the meter's internal resistance of 150ohms.

Would a shunt be able to correct for old age in all metering modes or would i need a different one for each mode? (Off to do some more math)
Back to top
Bamacoiler
Thu Oct 09 2008, 08:23PM
Bamacoiler Registered Member #1628 Joined: Wed Aug 06 2008, 08:48PM
Location: Huntsville, AL USA
Posts: 95
Even if I only get the Volt meter working close to accurate I will be happy, Really I just want it for show. I determined the FSD by putting a voltage across it until the needle deflected all the way, then i measured the voltage 62.5mV and calculated the current using the meter's internal resistance of 150ohms.

Would a shunt be able to correct for old age in all metering modes or would i need a different one for each mode? (Off to do some more math)


Well, I didn't think of that. But I tell you what though you guys are impressive. You learn to do a lot with just a little. That method should work pretty accurately in all voltage ranges but you will need to shunt each range individually. Current should be simple, just shunt it with some type resistor, measure the voltage drop and use ohm's law for the correct current to drive the meter. Resistance not too sure on probably some wheatstone bridge type method. How do the current and resistance ranges work? Or do they work at all?

Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.