Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 34
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
MicroTesla (34)


Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Extremely Simple Taser Concept

Move Thread LAN_403
coillah
Fri Aug 01 2008, 09:16PM Print
coillah Registered Member #1517 Joined: Wed Jun 04 2008, 06:55AM
Location: Chico CA
Posts: 304
Ok. Correct me if I am completely wrong but...

to create a really simple taser, all you would need to do is connect a small power source in parallel with a capacitor in parallel with a gap to be closed with contact with the taser?
Back to top
cjk2
Fri Aug 01 2008, 10:36PM
cjk2 Registered Member #51 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:17AM
Location:
Posts: 263
Yes, I don't see why people want to create such devices tho. What is the appeal of making something to hurt yourself/others with? If you want a device for self defense, I would almost suggest you buy one because if you are asking such a simple quesion you might be unsafe with what you make (too much energy storage, etc.). Commercial tasers use an arrangement that looks like :

Battery > Inverter > Capacitor > Sparkgap/voltage trigger > Pulse transformer > "Offending person"

Here are some pictures: http://www.bigclive.com/stunner.htm

Back to top
rp181
Sat Aug 02 2008, 02:08AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
capacitors are too much current, those could easily kill, commercial cant.
Back to top
Electroholic
Sat Aug 02 2008, 02:35AM
Electroholic Registered Member #191 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 02:01AM
Location: Esbjerg Denmark
Posts: 720
yes, and cap>sparkgap>pulse transformer configuration will give you enough voltage to go through clothings.
Back to top
Backyard Skunkworks
Sat Aug 02 2008, 05:15AM
Backyard Skunkworks Registered Member #1262 Joined: Fri Jan 25 2008, 05:22AM
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 451
You wanna aim for around 20 pulses per second of 0.5J each if I remember it right...
Back to top
quicksilver
Sat Aug 02 2008, 02:08PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
A heck of a lot of research goes into a defensive electrical weapon today: more than many people realize. It's well recorded that 5ma has resulted in lethal fibrillation.The level of current is one issue that entire teams work on and they settle mostly well below 2ma. But PLACEMENT means even more. The "Taser" concept is complex due to the spread of applied energy (across the chest in many cases).
But even if that is to be localized by a two prong contact device there are a lot of guys who can attest to what happens when the current finds a "path-way" through the body and results in a very debilitating wound; that does not heal well. This is very nasty stuff. Once the level of energy can overcome the resistance of thickened or calloused skin or light clothing, it's too high to be safe in all cases. Thus the Taser concept made use of darts that went beneath the top skin layer as that gave more control than a surface 'touch" design (in addition to the range issue provided in that design).

If I were ever even contemplating the development of an electrical weapon I would study the research on electrocution and accidents involving pathway routing of energy in accidents. The complexities are staggering (no pun intended). You need to remember that what gives a nasty but mostly harmless shock on the work bench won't even approach what is needed to stop a determined drunk, enraged and Hell bent on harming another person. That level of energy must be pretty high, indeed!

Cap discharge was actually something that Taser was considering when the "Taser rifle" was a development ear-mark. It seemed like cap discharge was the way to go to many people. But to get the thing to SAFELY incapacitate apparently was very difficult.
TTBoMK Taser had it on many development platforms but has not fully implemented the idea for law enforcement due to the complications of safety for the various idiosyncrasies that could arise.

Amnesty International took up the issue of electrical weapons not only because they had been misused in the torture of suspects around the world but because of the level of fatalities seen even when used in their intended methods. Capasitivie discharge being one of the primary "designs" that resulted in unintended complications when incorporated in such devices.....they (C/D oriented devices) are just not exacting enough to allow for a margin of safety. Enough energy to defend against attack is enough to do more harm than intended, was the consensus of those people who have actually worked in that field & would even speak publicly.

See Amnesty International & their enormous amount of information on electrical weapons. They have pages and pages of links to research & development in various countries; including the complications therein. Taser is in Scottsdale Arizona (I live in that state also) and they released a lot of information at one time early in their history.
Back to top
Seoul_lasers
Fri Aug 15 2008, 10:12AM
Seoul_lasers Registered Member #1630 Joined: Sat Aug 09 2008, 11:36AM
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 115
Well, The commercial units have been linked to fatalities. 5mA @ 60,000VDC is more than enough to seize muscles. That includes the heart. SO... while these devices are less than lethal for 80% of the population, people who are already on drugs or with a heart condition -- the shock of one of these units is LETHAL.

I have seen a commercial unit up close... It is essentially a cascade circuit not unlike (identical) to those old color/B&W TVs. The main difference is that the cascade delivers 45-60Kv across gap.
Back to top
quicksilver
Fri Aug 15 2008, 03:15PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
What this page : Link2
proposed was (IMO) lethal. I don't believe that they actually got the level of current claimed because of the crude testing method; but I would still never consider using that on any living being {in any instance a firearm would be more appropriate - as the result would probably be the same.....}
It's a very vicious device but it seems like the fellow got pretty into doing it. In any event, it's a pretty impressive little design.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.