Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 35
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
wpk5008 (35)


Next birthdays
05/08 wpk5008 (35)
05/09 Alfons (37)
05/09 Coronafix (52)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Schottky diode doesn't conduct current

Move Thread LAN_403
Tonic
Sat Jul 12 2008, 04:26PM Print
Tonic Registered Member #528 Joined: Fri Feb 16 2007, 10:32PM
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 166
I'm using MBR1045 10A 45V Schottky diodes for blocking current coming out from MOSFET's built-in free-wheeling diode. The problem is that the current from positive DC bus doesn't go to drain through diode and I have no idea why. The voltage drop across it is 220mV. It conducts in only one way, to drain (checked with resistance meter). I was testing with 34V DC. Is there something I don't know?

Another question regarding Schottky diodes - since they have low reverse voltage, wouldn't a situation, where voltage across Schottky is higher than reverse voltage and allow the current from primary coil to pass through it, occur? Or perhaps it's the outer fast diode (not the one inside transistor, but that we add) takes current and prevents from situation I described?
Back to top
Ken M.
Sun Jul 13 2008, 01:24AM
Ken M. Registered Member #618 Joined: Sat Mar 31 2007, 04:15AM
Location: Us-Great Lakes
Posts: 628
If understood correctly, the diode we add is a transorb, and from a guess I say it means transiant abosrber.
Back to top
Tonic
Sun Jul 13 2008, 08:25PM
Tonic Registered Member #528 Joined: Fri Feb 16 2007, 10:32PM
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 166
No, it's a ordinary fast diode, like this one on scheme (from Richie's site):

Bodydiod

Luckily, I solved it - surprisingly I had add more solder to track area between Schottky's cathode and MOSFET's drain. Very weird, the solder was looking pretty fine. And stupid, too tongue
Back to top
Marko
Sun Jul 13 2008, 08:47PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Tonic, what circuit are you building?

In really majority of uses those external diodes are absolutely unneeded. All that needs to be assured is that mosfet drives inductive load and it's internal diode will be more than fine.

Those external diodes of appropriate rating are going to be very expensive.
Back to top
Tonic
Sun Jul 13 2008, 09:19PM
Tonic Registered Member #528 Joined: Fri Feb 16 2007, 10:32PM
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 166
Marko wrote ...

Tonic, what circuit are you building?

To be exact, it's a completed half-bridge, which you can see in my another topic on Tesla coil forum section.

wrote ...

In really majority of uses those external diodes are absolutely unneeded. All that needs to be assured is that mosfet drives inductive load and it's internal diode will be more than fine.

Well, it's certainly true, but I've done it for few reasons: I'm a n00b and I have a tendency to destroy components because of my knowledge and experience. It doesn't hurt (or it hurts?) and the half-bridge is supposed to be redesigned in future for larger SSTCs, perhaps DRSSTC, too, reverse current could destroy transistor - in case I'd forgot to plug inductive load, for example.

And TO-220 diodes add a lot to cool factory tongue

Yeah, they are pretty expensive, about 1$ each piece :(
Back to top
Tom540
Wed Jul 16 2008, 08:56PM
Tom540 Banned on 3/17/2009.
Registered Member #487 Joined: Sun Jul 09 2006, 01:22AM
Location:
Posts: 617
I don't think you need those diodes. I stopped using them a long time ago when they were the only things blowing.
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Wed Jul 16 2008, 09:23PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
I have explained this briefly before, but will mention it again here:

The Schottky barrier diodes are required to block the MOSFETs intrinsic body-drain diode only when the inverter is trying to drive the TC resonator at a frequency _BELOW_ it's natural resonant frequency. Under these conditions the load current appears capacitive and leads the inverter output voltage. It changes direction _BEFORE_ the voltage changes polarity and this causes forced reverse recovery of the free-wheel diodes. Under these conditions the slow body-drain diodes of the MOSFETs are completely inadequate to withstand the full DC bus voltage being applied in reverse when heavily in forward conduction. The results are horrendous shoot-through currents, bus over-voltage spikes, high RFI and un-explained device failures.

If the inverter is always tuned _ABOVE_ the resonant frequency of the TC then the load current appears inductive and always _LAGS_ the applied voltage. Under these conditions ZVS occurs at MOSFET turn-on and the free-wheel diodes do not see a forced reverse-recovery. Under these conditions the MOSFET body-drain diodes are perfectly adequate.

Most cases in traditional Power Electronics involve sourcing a square voltage waveform to an inductive load (such as a transformer, motor, or choke to smooth current ripple) Therefore you rarely see MOSFET body diodes bypassed with the arrangement shown, except for in some DC motor speed controllers.

I hope this clears up any mystery regarding body-drain diode bypassing for SSTC and RF power applications.

-Richie,
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.