If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #659
Joined: Fri Apr 20 2007, 09:14AM
Location: SW Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 75
This idea might be a complete dud and I don't even know if it's original, but I thought I'd throw it out there anyway.
For best efficiency, a reluctance coilgun will generate magnetic fields of about 2 or 3 tesla to avoid wasting too much energy to exceed the magnetic saturation of the steel armature. This generally needs a relatively low current and voltage.
The inevitable problem that goes with this is that the coil's inductance slows the rate of current rise, and it can take some time to reach it's peak, restricting the impulse that's given to the projectile. This slow pulse also restricts the upper limits of velocity, because the current can't rise or fall fast enough to make it feasible for it to work on a faster projectile.
Now, an idea that's come to mind is that two capacitor banks could be used for each coil. One high voltage, relatively low capacitance one, with the grunt to push coil currents up to appropriate levels as quickly as possible, and one lower voltage, higher capacitance bank to maintain the coil current after it has reached it's peak.
Obviously, switching and charging would be more complex, but in my opinion, the idea could help erode some of the limits that plague coilguns.
I'd like to try the concept, probably in a rifle style design, but I'd also like some feedback on it first.
EDIT: Damn it, I was sure I was making this thread in the coilgun section. Apologies - could a friendly mod move it please?
Registered Member #659
Joined: Fri Apr 20 2007, 09:14AM
Location: SW Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 75
teslacoolguy wrote ... Shouldent this be in the Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators section?
Yeah, I spotted that right after I'd posted it. I was so sure I was making the thread in the EPA section - I have no idea how I got it in high voltage by mistake.
Registered Member #690
Joined: Tue May 08 2007, 03:47AM
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 616
I'm pretty sure this is why people use multiple stages in larger coilguns, because you can't have any single coil be too powerful since it will just saturate the projectile.
People DO use higher voltage and lower capacitance banks to get the current to rise faster, but they use them on the later coils in a multi-stage gun, when the projectile is moving very fast already.
Registered Member #659
Joined: Fri Apr 20 2007, 09:14AM
Location: SW Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 75
That's not quite what I said.
The point was to have two banks feeding each individual coil, one high voltage, low capacitance to allow the benefit of the fast pulse rise, but also a lower voltage one to maintain the optimal flux density for longer to maximise the impulse on the projectile.
My question is whether it's worth me making a prototype of the idea, or is my poor electronics knowledge is feeding me incorrect logic?
Registered Member #511
Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 11:36AM
Location: Somerset UK
Posts: 55
As I understand it your idea is to use a dual voltage drive to create a pulse with shorter rise and fall times. This is a very good idea, a pulse with a low ratio of peak to average current should be more efficient, especially if the fall time is shorter. As I see it this could be achieved with a variable voltage drive as you suggest or by pulse width modulation. Building a working prototype may not be straight-forward but please give it a go.
Registered Member #659
Joined: Fri Apr 20 2007, 09:14AM
Location: SW Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 75
Yes, that was the general idea. Multiple voltage drive to try and shorten pulse rise and fall times. It would obviously be more complex to implement such a thing, but it might be worth it.
I have some other ideas I'd like to try out, and I was planning on doing a multi-stage coil pistol to test them.
Registered Member #659
Joined: Fri Apr 20 2007, 09:14AM
Location: SW Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 75
I've come back and bumped this because I really would like some sensible feed back on it.
I've been discussing it with some other people, and they like the idea, although they're not particularly knowledgeable on coilguns, so I need the advice of people like you.
Registered Member #968
Joined: Fri Aug 24 2007, 04:54PM
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 104
This is an interesting idea. It is the opposite of a v-switch.
Saturation speed is still related to acceleration right? If you slow things down do you plan on having sufficient time to accelerate the projectile before the projectile center of mass aligns with the center of the coil and it has to be turned off?
I will be thinking more about this idea today. If I understand correctly you want to reach a target current as quickly as possible and maintain it? This is similar something I have been working on with my third coilgun. At high speeds I believe it is necessary to "warm the coil up" before the projectile gets there to make the most of the coil's time at high current. If you time a v-switch right you can actually get higher currents than without it. Triggering the v-switch just before di/dt crossed zero would be ideal. I imagine you could do the same thing with larger caps for the quenching caps, in multiple v-switch stages, and you could get something close to a wave around your target current.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.