If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1403
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
So I got offered another variac without any info but a picture, the wire is about 1.5mm(awg15) in diameter. The plastic box in the background is 16cm tall.
NEW INFO: It have been used in a 230vac measurement circuit, in danish "måleopstilling", not sure I translated it right.
Anyone that can guess or recognize its current limit?
Registered Member #1403
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
Sounds about right according to what I have found on google so far, for example this variac
Its a dual 0-140V 1500VA unit, as he writes "It can also be used to control both sides of a 240VAC circuit, for 0-280V input to a 3000VA load." I guess thats is either in series or a variac on phase and neutral
I counted windings on the one I got offered and the one in the link, they are both at about 80+ windings.
Would I be able to drive a 120vac variac for shorter periods of 10-15min, or would I fry it way faster at double voltage?
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
MadsKaizer wrote ...
Would I be able to drive a 120vac variac for shorter periods of 10-15min, or would I fry it way faster at double voltage?
If you doubled the voltage it would draw insane currents and blow the fuse. This is because of the core saturating. You might be able to run it at 110% or maybe 120% its rated voltage but no more.
Registered Member #1232
Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
> It strikes me that there are awfully few windings on this unit. Probably only good for 120V max.
It may be a 400Hz military/aviation variac. If so it will still work at 50Hz, but only up to 1/8th of its specified input voltage without core saturation.
Registered Member #1403
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
Thanks guys, hopefully the seller will find some more information, but for now it seems I cant use it either.
I understand core saturation like this, overvoltage on the primary will destroy my secondary output, as the magnetic flux cant go higher, secondary output will only be peaks.
would the primary current rise at 230vac instead of 120vac?, there must be something im missing
Registered Member #146
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
would the primary current rise at 230vac instead of 120vac?, there must be something im missing
The magnetizing current would go up, yes. Its important to distinguish magnetizing current from actual current being forwarded to your load. The magnetizing current is generally quite small because the variac winding should present a fair impedance to the line frequency at the input voltage, and not draw considerable idle current (magnetizing current). The magnetizing current should go up pretty linearly with applied voltage, until saturation, where you get lots of current!
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
I understand core saturation like this, overvoltage on the primary will destroy my secondary output, as the magnetic flux cant go higher, secondary output will only be peaks.
Well, yes, but more to the point, overvoltage on the primary will destroy the *primary* in a sizzle of smoking enamel, if the breakers hold. When Steve said you get lots of current, he meant lots and lots and lots.
I like the 400Hz theory, there's just no way you should be able to count the turns on a mains variac from a photo. Then again, it might just be a low voltage variac. Does the panel side look "aircrafty"?
You can estimate the voltage/frequency limit by finding the cross section of the core, and doing the flux/change sums.
You can estimate the current rating by measuring the cross section of the wire and using your favourite loading factor. 10A/mm2 is a pretty conservative continuous rating, you could go much higher with shorter runs and/or fan cooling.
Registered Member #1403
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
So basicly magnetizing current will rise very high at saturation as it no longer can dissipate its energy to the core/secondary load?
Unfortunately thats the only picture I have received so far, asked him for more but haven't got any yet.
To estimate voltage/frequency, you are talking about faraday's law? (V=2*f*N*A*Bs). So a little guesswork on the voltage or frequency and then see if it sounds fair.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
So basicly magnetizing current will rise very high at saturation as it no longer can dissipate its energy to the core/secondary load?
No, it's not about dissipating energy. Magnetising current will rise very high at saturation as the core can no longer generate enough back-emf, because it has lost inductance due to the core saturating. The primary wire is very low resistance, the effective applied voltage that this wire sees for Ohm's Law I=V/R is the supply voltage *minus* the voltage that is being generated in the primary inductance due to the rate of change of current. To a first (and generally pretty useful) approximation, consider the wire resistance is zero, and the primary current that flows is entirely controlled by the need for its rate of change to generate a back-voltage equal to the supply voltage across its inductance. As the inductance drops in saturation, the current rises. As the inductance heads towards zero, the current heads towards infinity (OK, now the wire resistance does start to have an effect, as do the breakers).
The point is that even just doubling the applied voltage sends the core core so deep into saturation, you may easily pull 10x rated load current just as magnetisation, which is 100x dissipation at rated power. Whereas doubling the rated load current by overcurrenting the secondary (but at the right voltage) only gives 4x the rated power dissipation, something a bit easier to manage by intermittent working.
Faraday's Law, yes. I haven't checked the formula you've quoted to see if there are any constant factors missing (the odd 2 here or pi there), but that's basically it, I never remember it, always derive it from first principles each time I come to use it. If you put in 60Hz and 400Hz, you will get two different answers for voltage, and they will each be right for their respective frequencies.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.