Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 117
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Sawing the MOT open

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Fri May 02 2008, 06:49PM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
As you may know a MOT has the E and I section welded together and the weld "extends" ca. 1-2mm into the core. Some questions:
1) Does this weld take part in carrying the magnetic flux?
2) If I saw the MOT open by sawing off the weld, will it work just as well after I put the core sections back together?

I'm just asking so I don't mess up a perfectly good transformer...



Back to top
Chris
Fri May 02 2008, 08:55PM
Chris Registered Member #8 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 04:34AM
Location: Harlowton, MT, United States
Posts: 214
It will work just as well as before if the joining surfaces to meet almost perfectly, yes. Make sure to file it carefully along the direction of the laminates if at all, so the burrs don't short the laminates together, creating a path for eddy currents. I would apply a thin coat of laquer on the ends too if there is bare metal exposed.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sat May 03 2008, 06:53AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Ok thanks. Just to clarify what I meant: The core will be thinner in the place of sawn off welds. Will this have any significant effect on decreased inductance/lower saturation voltage and increased no-load input current?

1209797567 152 FT44543 Mot Core



Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sat May 03 2008, 07:56AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
A MOT is already heavily into saturation, so reducing the core area *will* make the magnetising current slightly worse.

However, failure to get the inevitable air-gap between the Es and Is back to what it was before will have a far more significant effect (what a manufacturer can acheive with pristine metalwork and a hydraulic press is going to be far better than an amatuer can with hand-buggered-about-with metalwork and a vice). This is where you need to apply your care and skill.

So with these changes, you are unlikely to "mess it up" with care, but you will degrade it slightly.

You could probably ignore the increase in magnetising current due to both sources, probably without extra cooling. Or you could mitigate it a little by throwing a few extra primary turns on while you have the core open. This will reduce the peak flux, mitigating the reduction in core area. It will also increase the inductance, mitigating the increased air-gap. It will however reduce the turns ratio, reducing the output voltage.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sat May 03 2008, 08:34AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Dr. Slack wrote ...

A MOT is already heavily into saturation, so reducing the core area *will* make the magnetising current slightly worse.
yeah, this thing sucks 600VA just sitting there plugged in! (Chinese quality with aluminium primary)

The only place where I could put the additional windings is above the shunts where the heater winding used to be. I would really like to wind it under the shunts so the inductance actually increases. Maybe I can move the shunts a bit up, I'll see...

Any guess as to how much worse will the magnetising current be? Maybe someone who had actually done this can comment?

I wouldn't mind messing it up if there were free microwaves next to the roads, but it is impossible to obtain a free one here.




Back to top
Dr. Slack
Mon May 05 2008, 07:47AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
You could lose the shunts as well. The leakage inductance they add is pretty low, rarely enough to comprise all of the ballast you need. Without them it will give you the flexibility to operate it like a real transformer. When you need additional inductance for ballast, add it externally.
Back to top
Lakeowner
Mon May 05 2008, 05:58PM
Lakeowner Registered Member #1370 Joined: Mon Mar 03 2008, 09:01AM
Location: Finland
Posts: 56
I've done core opening with an angle grinder. I took shunts out and wound new secondary, 4 turns of 16mm² grounding copper. Regardless thick bolts and wood that clamps MOT, system is VERY noisy. It takes about 4A (@230V) magnetising current, and sharp 50Hz roar is audible very loud and clear. Secondary gives >300A short-circuit current. I also made new shunts from normal sheet iron and duct tape (yes, where is silicon steel...). I think epoxy could solve the noise problem...
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Tue May 06 2008, 04:08PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
The welding of transformer stacks really is a cheap and dirty trick. Transformer cores are laminated to stop eddy-currents that would circulate if the core was solid iron. Running a welder down both sides of the stack of laminations just shorts them all back together again at that point allowing current flow between the laminations.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Tue May 06 2008, 04:54PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
I have sawn it open already (everything went as planned), and I was able to see that the laminations do not short together. They are just "bent" in the place of the weld but not shorted. How would the transformer otherwise work? It would trip the breaker.



Back to top
benbradley
Wed May 14 2008, 05:00AM
benbradley Registered Member #312 Joined: Mon Mar 13 2006, 01:50AM
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 27
I was going to suggest measuring the inductance of the primary before cutting it open, and measuring it again after putting it back together to get an idea of how much inductance is lost in the process. This won't tell you anything about saturation (unless you measure voltage, current, phase, current waveshape and such before and after), but will give some idea of how much things changed with the weld opened up. Perhaps do all that with your next MOT.

Do you have a "Variac" (TM), (R) of sufficient current rating? That would be useful to determine what primary voltage it starts to saturate at (before and after cutting it apart/reassembling).
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.