Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/14 hvguy (42)
05/14 thehappyelectron (15)
05/14 Justin (2025)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Using aircored inductors in boost converter

Move Thread LAN_403
TheMerovingian
Thu Feb 14 2008, 11:25AM Print
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
I'm currently working for the ICCOM-CNR institute as a local sponsorship working on fuel cells. In particular I use some electrochemical methods to test catalists for DAFC. Having also a small background in electronics i design some power converters to power small devices from fuel cells (eg cell phones) with the purpose of attract fundings and investors showing some applications at congresses and fairs. Fuell cell stack voltages are very low, so i switched on controller ICs (Maxim) that require small voltages to work with bootstrapped output. Since the voltage is very low (0.9 - 1.5V) and the swithching frequency is insanely high (1MHz) i need a very small inductor with a high current rating (>2A). The inductor value ranges from 0.5uH to 1.5uH . I failed to design properly the inductor using a ferrite core, and the commercial inductors have a small current rating and are difficult to find here. I was suggested to try air core. My worries are that an air cored inductor at 1MHz will radiate noise all other the place and so have poor efficiency. So should i try air core or buy an appropriate inductor from eg CoilCraft ?
Back to top
Mates
Thu Feb 14 2008, 11:57AM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
TheMerovingian wrote ...

I'm currently working for the ICCOM-CNR institute as a local sponsorship working on fuel cells. In particular I use some electrochemical methods to test catalists for DAFC. Having also a small background in electronics i design some power converters to power small devices from fuel cells (eg cell phones) with the purpose of attract fundings and investors showing some applications at congresses and fairs. Fuell cell stack voltages are very low, so i switched on controller ICs (Maxim) that require small voltages to work with bootstrapped output. Since the voltage is very low (0.9 - 1.5V) and the swithching frequency is insanely high (1MHz) i need a very small inductor with a high current rating (>2A). The inductor value ranges from 0.5uH to 1.5uH . I failed to design properly the inductor using a ferrite core, and the commercial inductors have a small current rating and are difficult to find here. I was suggested to try air core. My worries are that an air cored inductor at 1MHz will radiate noise all other the place and so have poor efficiency. So should i try air core or buy an appropriate inductor from eg CoilCraft ?

What about to load 10 electrolytic caps to 1V in parallel and then reconnect them electronically in series and load a one cap for 10V? That could be much easier to construct…
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Thu Feb 14 2008, 12:18PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
Although the inductance value is low, the air core coil may still be quite large and need many turns.

You could try air-core, ferrite stick, iron-powder and maybe even a small gapped ferrite core design. You didn't say what the design constraints were, eg. Cost, efficiency, weight, temperature rise, EMI? A design using a ferrite stick or a tiny gapped Mn/Zn ferrite core set should give lower overall losses if done properly. You could also try winding the choke on a type-2 iron powder core from Micrometals. Something like 19 turns on a T30-2 should be close to 1.5uH and not too lossy at 1MHz.

All designs but the iron powder one will have a significant leakage field.

-Richie,
Back to top
Sulaiman
Thu Feb 14 2008, 06:54PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3141
If I were you I'd design my inverter to operate somewhere between 280 kHz and 530 kHz,
above the LW and below the MW radio bands - less chance of consumer complaints.
If so then I'd go for a ferrite LBC (large-bobbin-core) inductor if you're desining a trough-hole pcb.
They're cheap, about the size of a 0.5W resistor, can handle fairly high currents and have a reasonable 'Q'.
e.g. Link2

If you're designing smd then there is a huge range to choose from.

Assuming your design(s) will go into production, start with components suitable for mass-production.
Back to top
Marko
Thu Feb 14 2008, 07:08PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Hm, isn't it important which mode converter is designed to work in,

as far as I know powdered iron is not good for large AC components but is superior to ferrite in max flux density (which you may not need much at all) so it would be a choice for a continuous mode converter. And yes, toroidal cores with distributed airgap will leak less flux.

From other side discontinuous mode converter would need ferrite core because of large AC component, may have more loss due to skin effect, but efficiency of circuit is helped because of zero current turn on, and etc.

As usual it's lots of trade offs, I hope you guys fill me up if I'm wrong on something.

But I don't see a special reason why would you want to use air core if you don't need to, as it will always have lower efficiency per cost that cored inductors.


I failed to design properly the inductor using a ferrite core, and the commercial inductors have a small current rating and are difficult to find here.

Can you describe how did you exactly 'fail' it, how was the core dimensioned and gapped, more data?

Just few turns would in most cases be enough for what you described.
Back to top
TheMerovingian
Thu Feb 14 2008, 10:45PM
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
Marko wrote ...

Hm, isn't it important which mode converter is designed to work in,

as far as I know powdered iron is not good for large AC components but is superior to ferrite in max flux density (which you may not need much at all) so it would be a choice for a continuous mode converter. And yes, toroidal cores with distributed airgap will leak less flux.

From other side discontinuous mode converter would need ferrite core because of large AC component, may have more loss due to skin effect, but efficiency of circuit is helped because of zero current turn on, and etc.

As usual it's lots of trade offs, I hope you guys fill me up if I'm wrong on something.

But I don't see a special reason why would you want to use air core if you don't need to, as it will always have lower efficiency per cost that cored inductors.


I failed to design properly the inductor using a ferrite core, and the commercial inductors have a small current rating and are difficult to find here.

Can you describe how did you exactly 'fail' it, how was the core dimensioned and gapped, more data?

Just few turns would in most cases be enough for what you described.

I cannot calculate a proper value, since i don't know ferrite permeability.
Design a 1.5uH air cored inductor isn't tricky, but i don't know if i has some drawbacks
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sat Feb 16 2008, 06:58PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
You don't need to know the ferrite permeability to design a flyback inductor to specific inductance.

Think about it.

If you are designing a flyback inductor, then it needs an air-gap, otherwise you are wasting almost all of the performance of the ferrite.

If it has an air-gap, then the air will dominate the ferrite (if you've designed it right), and to a first approximation you can consider the ferrite as infinitely permaeable.

As a small correction, reckon the total ferrite path as 10% of the reluctance of the airgap. It's probably in the right ball-park, and won't make a huge difference if you're wrong by a factor of several either way.

An air-gapped ferrite will give you best volume efficiency, an air-core would need to be big to compete on Q, and a non-air-gapped ferrite would use much ferrite and be very inaccurate.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.