IRFP250 v/s IRFP250N
|
|
Thomas F
|
Sun Jan 13 2008, 09:17AM
|
|
|
Registered Member #503
Joined: Sun Nov 19 2006, 06:37PM
Location:
Posts: 59
|
Hello ,
I was checking the bullets on the datasheets of these 2 MOSFETS. It says IRFP250 is single pulse avalanche energy rated while IRFP250N is fully avalanche rated.Would'nt it be preferable to just use IRFP250N or is there some other criteria to be considered.
Thomas
|
Back to top
|
|
Dr. Dark Current
|
|
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
|
Well the N version is a newer one so I guess it is preferred to use it.
|
Back to top
|
|
Thomas F
|
|
Registered Member #503
Joined: Sun Nov 19 2006, 06:37PM
Location:
Posts: 59
|
but then old is gold just kidding, any tech reason ?
|
Back to top
|
|
Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob
|
|
Powered by e107 Forum System
|