Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 94
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

wormholes, causality.

Move Thread LAN_403
Marko
Fri Jan 11 2008, 01:25AM Print
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
There is a simple thought experiment that always bothered me - how much sense does it make to discuss 'passable wormholes', as they are usually imagined?

If an object is sent through a wormhole, and a laser beam at same time near the wormhole, the object arrives at destination before the beam.

What I can't understand is, why wouldn't this object, even if not locally surpassing c, travel into past for an external observer?

I'm trying to understand the ''spirit'' of relativity of simultaneity here.

I can't easily imagine how could a causality paradox arise here, since it's hard to use logic on this things.

I know there are paradoxes involving accelerated wormholes but I'd like to solve this first. :p

Marko

Back to top
Bjørn
Sat Jan 12 2008, 03:48PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
With stationary wormholes of this kind you only get "optical illusion" time travel. If you have two clocks and wormhole them around and then compare them side by they will still show the same time even if they appeared to show different times a moment ago.

If you take one wormhole and zip it around at realtivistic speeds (alternatively dangle it above a black hole) for some time it will age slower than the other wormhole and they will get out of sync timewise. Then you can pass a clock between them and make the clocks out of sync.

I would not call this theory but weak hypothesis. We are talking about oversimplified and incomplete equations that give certain solutions of very questionable validity.
Back to top
Marko
Sun Jan 13 2008, 03:10PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
With stationary wormholes of this kind you only get "optical illusion" time travel. If you have two clocks and wormhole them around and then compare them side by they will still show the same time even if they appeared to show different times a moment ago.

So there's nothing really preventing me from appearing at destination sooner than light beam sent off near the wormhole at same time...?

If you take one wormhole and zip it around at realtivistic speeds (alternatively dangle it above a black hole) for some time it will age slower than the other wormhole and they will get out of sync timewise. Then you can pass a clock between them and make the clocks out of sync.

Yes, but how does this break causality?
If one throat is time dilated, I still can't see why would object exit before entering.

This got my attention too: Link2





Back to top
Bjørn
Sun Jan 13 2008, 04:30PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
So there's nothing really preventing me from appearing at destination sooner than light beam sent off near the wormhole at same time...?
There are several theoretical ways according to general relativity to arrive at a destination before a light beam taking a straight line. There is nothing in the math that forbids it, but the implications makes everything quite messy and the math gives the impression of being incomplete.

If one throat is time dilated, I still can't see why would object exit before entering.
If we go to the extreme and move one wormhole around at the speed of light then it will not age and you can always travel back to the creation of the wormholes by passing from one to the other. I can't see how you can get back to the future you came from again because how would the wormhole know what time you came from? If lots of people jump in at different times and appear at the same time in the past, then back would be a different time for each person.

The more you think about it the sillier it gets.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.