Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 80
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
02/08 Mark-H (62)
02/08 Mates (47)
02/09 Zyrppa (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

One big cap vs many smaller caps

Move Thread LAN_403
Zum Beispiel
Fri Oct 12 2007, 06:55PM Print
Zum Beispiel Registered Member #514 Joined: Sun Feb 11 2007, 12:27AM
Location: Somewhere in Pirkanmaa, Finland
Posts: 295
I've been designing a coilgun and now I have a decision to make:

I can either get one large capacitor or 10 smaller caps. The caps are regular filter caps.
I can store the required amount of energy at required voltage in either setup, and both cost about as much.

Is there any (dis)advantage in using a single large cap or many smaller caps? I think if I put many smaller caps in parallel, I get lower ESR than using a single big cap.

Since size or mechanical complexity isn't really an issue I can go either way on this one, but I'd like to hear your opinnions on this.
Back to top
rupidust
Sun Oct 14 2007, 06:46AM
rupidust Banned
Registered Member #110 Joined: Fri Feb 10 2006, 12:23AM
Location: Banned City
Posts: 85
Makes not difference is using a single stage. Multiple caps can be arranged to take on a shape, as in to fit inside a housing other than a simple rectangle.
Back to top
Quantum Singularity
Sun Oct 28 2007, 05:09AM
Quantum Singularity Registered Member #158 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
The one big cap probably has a bunch of smaller caps inside... well at least some of them are that way. The many smaller caps allows you to change the configuration, higher voltage, higher capacitance, etc. So basically its more flexable. Requires a lot more wiring though...
Back to top
Derek_L
Sat Nov 17 2007, 01:48AM
Derek_L Registered Member #1125 Joined: Fri Nov 16 2007, 09:13PM
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 62
Its a lot cheaper to replace one faulty small cap then one faulty large cap :P
Back to top
Bjørn
Sat Nov 17 2007, 03:43AM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
Many small capacitors are more likely to have a failure. So either could be an advantage depending on your preference.

Several small capacitors makes it possible for you to experiment with different voltages which is usually important unless you have made a lot of coilguns.
Back to top
Barry
Sat Nov 17 2007, 06:15PM
Barry Registered Member #90 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:44PM
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 301
Many smaller caps in parallel generally have a lower ESR than one large cap (as you noted in the opening post). This is very important to coilguns; even a few milliohms does make a difference in the peak current.

It is very useful for experimentation purposes to have smaller caps to combine in different ways. Ignoring the total stored energy for a moment, the rise time and resonant frequency depends on the LC time constant. So it's helpful to try combining them for various total capacitance.

If multiple caps are so good, why aren't all coilguns built from thousands of them? Mechanical complexity and assembly is certainly a practical consideration that keeps it from becoming ridiculous. But more importantly the extra wiring leads to more self-inductance and of course resistance. We do need to keep wires as short as possible.

Cheers, Barry
What would the Flying Spaghetti Monster do?
Back to top
Zum Beispiel
Sat Nov 17 2007, 07:22PM
Zum Beispiel Registered Member #514 Joined: Sun Feb 11 2007, 12:27AM
Location: Somewhere in Pirkanmaa, Finland
Posts: 295
Thanks for all the replies, but I already bought the caps back in october.

I ended up going with the multiple cap approach, for the reasons pointed out here. Now if I can actually get to building the damn thing. mistrust

But, now, as we are still talking:

How would you arrange the caps for a dual stage accelerator? I have 400J worth of caps (10 caps, at 400V max), so what would be a good starting point for two stages (300J for the first, 100J for the second 200/200, or something else?)

I know I need shorter pulse for the second stage, so less energy for it sounds good, but I'm a bit of a coilgunning noob, so lets hear what the experts have to say! smile
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.