Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 35
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/14 hvguy (42)
05/14 thehappyelectron (15)
05/14 Justin (2025)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Driving mosfet gates in a royer negative.

Move Thread LAN_403
Marko
Wed Sept 19 2007, 04:49PM Print
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
This was the basic idea:


1189627693 89 FT30472 Isolated Pulldown Sources


And the question is simple, why doesn't it work?

I used 1,5V batteries with decoupling caps to provide isolated sources. Feedback diodes were two series 1N4148's which seemed to drop down about 2V total in this case.
When I used one battery per leg, the minimal gate voltage dropped to about 1V;
When I put the next one in series, the voltage went down to almost perfect zero except for some ringing. At that point I thought it's an epic success, but soon got disappointed.

When I seriesed another battery hoping for more negative voltage, the circuit didn't want to oscillate.

Same was with 9V batteries or any other source.

And I'm still banging head what's happening and what should I do. If I can get this to work it would make best possible feedback I know.

Can anyone give me a clue what's logically wrong with the arrangement?

Maybe I should use the source in series with the gate, and higher drive voltage?
Or put it behind diodes?

Help.

Back to top
...
Wed Sept 19 2007, 06:31PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
Could you just be having problems due to the high ESR of a battery? Perhaps a little cap across the battery would solve it?
Back to top
Marko
Wed Sept 19 2007, 07:54PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
I already said, I decoupled the batteries with caps, 100nF ceramics and 470uF lytics respectively. But I simply lose oscillation when I try to drive it just a fraction of volt into negative.

I bet somebody with good whack for logic can solve this easily.. ^ ^
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Sept 19 2007, 09:01PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I think it's because both MOSFETs need to be on at once to get the circuit started. It really doesn't matter if both devices are on at once. The ZVS is a current-fed inverter, so it can't be hurt by shoot-through. Bad things only happen if both devices turn *off* at once causing the DC link choke to kick back, which is bad in the same way as shorting out the DC link with shoot-through on a voltage-fed inverter. If you want to know more, read up on the principle of duality.
Back to top
Marko
Wed Sept 19 2007, 10:53PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Hi all, steve,
BTW I PM'ed you again, couldn't resist, I'm sorry for being cumbersome angry

I completely agree with you, although off-through condition is something yet to be seen, since mosfet delays always take care of that. smile

I did although see some weird artifacts in voltage waveform on the inductor, but nothing over like 10% of main amplitude.

Now, I have managed to get the negative drives working! smile
I use four small IRFU410 mosfets (2 in paralell) since they have much smaller delays, are free from CFL's and ideal for study.

The thing decided to work when I put the batteries 'before' main diodes and with reverse Schottky diode in parallel.

Batteries got quite loaded, but pulled the gate down to -5V.

The circuit did not want to start until I applied main power, and even then sometimes it would just short the supply. (Small mosfets handle the shorting nicely due to their high resistance). Definitely not something reliable yet!

From theoretical side, mosfets should turn on into metastable state same as without negative supplies, at least as I think. I don't see anything that may be causing trouble.

I really owe a hug to anyone who can resolve what is exactly happening here! lol.


If you ask why is this all about, I simply want faster and more efficient gate drive. I don't think it can be too fast in tis kind of circuit, can it?

My last circuit used a heavy slow 600V diode and large pullup resistors. Due to voltage drop of ~1.5V on the diode I was unable to drive any kind of active pullup, nor UCC's nor small mosfets with <1V treshold voltage.

With negative drive I'l be able to use a series string of 1N4148's since forward drop isn't very important anymore; very fast and cheap.

Large passive pullups were slow, hot, and caused mosfets to spend large part of half cycle in linear region, which in turn made the mosfets very hot.

Shown waveforms are slowish too despite only 400pf of capacitance, I plan to get them into perfection...

I need sleep badly now...



1190242391 89 FT31616 Negative 1

1190242391 89 FT31616 Negative
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.