Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 104
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Capacitor Charging vs. Resistors Drawing dilemma.

Move Thread LAN_403
MikeT1982
Fri Jul 27 2007, 12:05AM Print
MikeT1982 Registered Member #621 Joined: Sun Apr 01 2007, 12:37AM
Location:
Posts: 119
Ok, as I tend to do all of the time I was sitting here and pondering my Cap charging circuit. I am using 3 paralleled NST's each rated at 4kV@30ma, for 4kV@90ma.

Now what I used to think was that a transformer, like one of my NST's rated at 4kV@30mA would be able to provide 30mA of current at 4,000 volts. However I have heard people say that 30mA is only what the transformer would produce into a short circuit.

So that talk puzzles me and leads to my dilemma. My cap bank will have one 25,000 Ohm voltage equalizing resistor across each capacitor. I have 16 capacitors and therefore 16 resistors. Each capacitor is rated at 400 volts, for 6,400 volt capacity. However, with rectifying my 4kV NST's I multiply by 1.4 to get about 5657 volts where the caps theoretically would level off.

The way I see it is the 3 paralleled NST's will have a "goal" to charge my cap bank to that 5657 volts at which it will level off (I'm hoping it gets to at least 5kV for my flash tube!). When I first energize and the capacitors are discharged, the NST's will see a dead short and push the full 90mA right? But as the voltage climbs if the talk I read about is right, the current capability of the NST's will drop off as the capacitors charge.

So that I am thinking must be WHY capacitors charge slower the higher to their charge goal voltage they approach!

So to my parasitic resistor dilemma....all 16 of those 25kOhm resistors give me 400,000 ohms which when plugged into Ohms law equation with the 5657 voltage goal, gives me 14mA of current draw by the resistors.....and that when crunched through Ohms Law equation again gives about 80 watts of parasitc loss to the darn voltage equalizing (and power off safety draining!) resistors.

My big question is, will this 14mA of draw by my resistors actually prevent my capacitors from reaching that 5657 volt goal? Since according to what I have read, the NST's won't be able to supply 90mA at even 4kV....wouldn't in theory there be the point in the voltage climb at which the NST's hit a plateau when the "current delivery at a given voltage" meets my resistors parasitc draw......I just can't wait to try this real world and see where the caps charge to!!

Thank you ahead of time for reading my long winded post!
Back to top
Simon
Fri Jul 27 2007, 12:31AM
Simon Registered Member #32 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 08:58AM
Location: Australia
Posts: 549
MikeT1982 wrote ...

So that I am thinking must be WHY capacitors charge slower the higher to their charge goal voltage they approach!
Kind of. The reasons why the cap slows in charging is the same kind of reason the NST drops in current output. In both cases it's a resistance (or an effective one).

Your basic, raw cap charging circuit is a cap, a perfect voltage source and a resistance all in a loop. (The resistance is the equivalent of any charging resistors and internal resistances of the real voltage source.) Any voltage from the source is dropped either across the cap or the resistor. If the source is, say, 500V and the cap is only charged to 10V, that means there's 490V across the resistor. Basic ohm's law tells you there is a large current flowing to charge the capacitor, so it charges rapidly.

When the cap is charged to 490V, there's now only 10V across the resistor, so the current is a lot less, so the cap charges much more slowly.

You can get a feel for why the NST voltage drops with the same kind of idea. At high currents, a large voltage is dropped across the output resistance and hence only a small amount is left for the output.

wrote ...

My big question is, will this 14mA of draw by my resistors actually prevent my capacitors from reaching that 5657 volt goal?
Yes. The charging will fall far short of that 5.7kV.

A high voltage supply with a low current capability can be treated like a constant current source, rather than a constant voltage source. You don't need limiting resistors if you're okay with the peak output of the supply.
Back to top
Bert
Fri Jul 27 2007, 01:24PM
Bert Registered Member #118 Joined: Fri Feb 10 2006, 05:35AM
Location: Woodridge, Illinois, USA
Posts: 72
MikeT1982 wrote:
But as the voltage climbs if the talk I read about is right, the current capability of the NST's will drop off as the capacitors charge.

So that I am thinking must be WHY capacitors charge slower the higher to their charge goal voltage they approach!

Actually, that's only part of the reason. As your capacitor bank charges, the "on time" of your HV rectifiers becomes less and less. The HV rectifiers will pass charging current to the bank only during the peak portions of the AC waveform (i.e., when the transformer output voltage is greater than the bank voltage). This becomes a smaller and smaller portion of the incoming AC waveform as your bank charges. Adding insult to injury, your NST's will also deliver less charging current at higher voltages. Finally, your equilizing resistors are drawing significant load current from the capacitor bank ALL the time. All of these factors conspire to significantly reduce the maximum voltage reached by the capacitor bank. Using a X2 or X3 voltage multiplier in your charging circuit will help increase charging efficiency particularly at higher bank voltages, addressing the first two problems. However, you'll also need to closely monitor the bank voltage to make sure you don't accidently overvolt the bank. Increasing the equilizing resistor values will help adress the third problem.
Back to top
MikeT1982
Fri Jul 27 2007, 08:45PM
MikeT1982 Registered Member #621 Joined: Sun Apr 01 2007, 12:37AM
Location:
Posts: 119
Ok cool guys thank you for all the input! If I get significantly lower than 5kV, I may definitely need to encorperate a voltage multiplier...but from what I read they only double, triple ect.... And really since I have no cutoff, I should have went with maybe a 5 or 6 kV NST as a good median compromise. My target voltage is between 5 and 6kV. The cap bank is 6,400 volt max and 7,200 volt surge. Looks like my 4kV NST's might not get me there cry
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.