Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 23
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Gavin (49)
Froskoy (33)
UnHappy1 (59)


Next birthdays
07/16 Gavin (49)
07/16 Froskoy (33)
07/16 UnHappy1 (59)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

iron vane meters & current meters

Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Sun Feb 26 2006, 09:12PM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
A simple current meter is a coil of wire that is energized within a permanent magnetic field. The deflection will read proportional current (I believe the average current). An iron vane meter is a piece of iron that is attracted to an energized coil of wire and this reads the RMS current.

I have tried searching for the physics behind why one is average and one is RMS. Does anyone have a reference or explaination?
Back to top
Marko
Sun Feb 26 2006, 09:48PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Permanent magnet will vibrate as the polarity changes, far more likely than iron vane (it can measure RMS for AC as long as frequency is high enough).
Back to top
WaveRider
Wed Mar 01 2006, 09:25AM
WaveRider Registered Member #29 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 09:00AM
Location: Hasselt, Belgium
Posts: 500
Mechanical current meters measure average current, in reality. Example: Connect your moving coil milliammeter across an AC (lets say 50-60Hz) current source of RMS value 1mA, and it will read 0mA. Why? Because the average value of a purely AC signal is 0. It does not read the RMS value. A typical mechanical VOM reads RMS because the AC signal is rectified and the meter senses the average value of this rectifed current, which for a full-wave rectified sinusoidal signal, is

Iavg = 2 * Ipeak / pi

The scale of the meter can be constructed to measure RMS from the average value because the RMS value and the AVG value are related by

Irms / Iavg = 0.7071 / 0.6366 = 1.111

Therefore, by calibrating the tics on the meter, you can get the RMS reading.

Note that the meter scale will not give correct RMS values for a square wave, for example. A measurement of RMS current for a square wave can be made by taking the indicated RMS meter value (which is calibrated for a sine wave) and divide by the form-factor 1.111 to get the RMS value for a square wave (because Iavg = Irms for a square wave).
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Mar 01 2006, 10:30AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I don't know.. I was (and still am, in fact) under the impression that an iron vane meter reads the true RMS value of a signal. The reason being that the attraction between iron and coil is proportional to the square of the current.
Back to top
WaveRider
Wed Mar 01 2006, 11:22AM
WaveRider Registered Member #29 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 09:00AM
Location: Hasselt, Belgium
Posts: 500
Steve, I think you are partially right about the iron-vane meter..deflection will be proportional to the mean square of the current (not root mean square).. The force on the vane will be proportional to the square of the field (as long as the current is not high enough to begin saturating the vane)... The tics on the meter face need to accout for a "square-root" operation to read RMS current correctly. Iron-vane meters also need to be corrected for frequency effects..

In my previous blathering, I was speaking about the moving coil meters, which seem to be the most common..

Back to top
Bored Chemist
Wed Mar 01 2006, 07:31PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
The really nice thing about moving iron meters is that you can calibrate them with DC- which is easy- then use them to measure AC true RMS currents quite accurately, even over a fair range of frequencies and waveforms. The "fudge factor" of 1.111 only works for sine waves. The big problem is they are inductive as anything and not very sensitive. Last time I saw one was in an old battery charger where- ironicaly, you want average current not RMS.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.