Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 39
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
hvguy (42)
thehappyelectron (15)
Justin (2025)


Next birthdays
05/15 Linas (35)
05/15 Toasty (30)
05/16 kg7bz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Triggered Mosfet to increase efficiency?

Move Thread LAN_403
CM
Thu Dec 21 2006, 03:42PM Print
CM Banned on April 7, 2007
Registered Member #277 Joined: Fri Mar 03 2006, 10:15AM
Location: Florida
Posts: 157
Many of you have been kind enough to discuss with me on this board different ideas/concepts for stepping down the HV from a spark gap to LV. Thanks very much. So far, the simple 'Snubber' aka "Buck Converter" in the diagram below that I started out with a couple years ago provides the best results (the red transistor in the diagram is replaced by my randomly firing spark gap, typically 1-3 sparks every 5 seconds). The circuit works decently, however, I need to squeeze just a bit more efficiency out. According to articles listed below, higher efficiency is obtainable if the diode in the circuit is replaced with a suitable 'triggered' Mosfet or Transistor, thus creating a kind of Sychronous Rectifier. This is the part where I admittedly could spend the next six month tinkering/stumbling around trying to come up with the proper trigger circuit necessary to turn on/off a suitable Mostfet or transistor, it's just not my area of expertise, whereas considering the amazing talent present here on this board, some of you could do it in your sleep. I would be very appreciative for any assistance in this part of the circuit. I am even willing to pay a mutually agreeable consultation fee to whichever person helps me get this done (per a written agreement). Thanks in advance. CM

Link2 and Link2


Back to top
Steve Conner
Sat Dec 23 2006, 08:15PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Did you ever stop to think what inverse voltage rating the rectifier in that circuit needs? If you do think about it, you'll see that it needs to be the same as the breakdown voltage of your spark gap: several kV.

If you think some more, you'll hopefully come to the conclusion that this needs a series string of the highest voltage MOSFETs you can find, with snubber capacitors to equalize transient voltages.

Then you might sit down with the MOSFET datasheet and notice that the parasitic shunt capacitance of this assembly is going to be large compared with the capacitance that you're extracting energy from, hence it's going to end up LESS efficient than a string of low current HV diodes! (SMPS design manuals usually recommend not to bother using synchronous rectifiers for output voltages above 5V, let alone kV.)

In fact, if you thought about this long enough, you might come to the conclusion that your device would never harvest enough energy to pay back its bill of materials cost and its recurring maintenance costs. (Its insulators are going to have to be kept very clean, or the charge will leak away.)

I still think that the "Tesla coil in reverse" idea I proposed has the most chance of working, which is still not very much chance, though.
Back to top
CM
Sun Dec 24 2006, 03:07PM
CM Banned on April 7, 2007
Registered Member #277 Joined: Fri Mar 03 2006, 10:15AM
Location: Florida
Posts: 157
Steve:

I appreciate the insights of your past posts. In reply to your recent post, yes indeed, I've stopped many times to think and reflect on my project over the last three or so years. One leason I've learned is that sometimes relying strictly on written specifications doesn't actually reflect real world performance. Case in point, I've successfully been using the above Snubber circuit for over a year to reduce KV sparks down to around 3 volts continuous, using one low voltage diode and one low voltage cap in combo with an inductor. The key is selecting the proper value inductor to make this work to keep the LV diode and LV cap from degrading over time. When connected to my novel HV source (patent applied for in Feb 2006, my 3rd patent) the overall system is efficient enough to operate multiple jumbo LEDS continuously, or small motor, and on it's best days, can operate a small fuel cell to produce Hydrogen/oxygen. My system is right on the 'hairy' threshold of being able to operate a fuel cell producing hydrogen round the clock, just a small increase in the snubber circuit efficency should reach the goal. Although what I've done may be counter-intuitive, it works. I continue to thank you and others that can offer helpful advice from time to time. CM
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.