Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 50
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
11/25 Chris (39)
11/25 JamesH (17)
11/25 Oakley (21)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Maximum Permissible RF Exposure FCC Regulations

Move Thread LAN_403
Carbon_Rod
Tue Feb 12 2019, 05:24AM Print
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
Does anyone know the specific model the IEEE and FCC guidelines are based on?

For example, if I have a isotropic emission from my phone's WiFi, does the safety limits supersede normal regulatory guidelines.

The phone section:
17dBm at 2450 MHz we get roughly Pt = 50mW into the antenna
Antenna is a Gt= +-1dB gain matched 3.2mm * 1.6mm * 1.3mm ceramic style chip

This chart says 1mW/cm*2 in uncontrolled settings:
Link2


Given:
wavelength of about L=0.12m
distance from human skin to antenna of R=0.05m
assumed skin is around Gr = 0bBi

And used the ideal calculator from here:
Link2

Max Received power Pw = (Pt*Gt*Gr*L^2)/((4*Pi*R)^2)
Pw=0.0023 Watts (or 3.6dBm)
thus, a little over double the safety limits...

Now if I increase distance R >= 0.077m
Pw
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Tue Feb 12 2019, 05:33AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
part 2, as unable to edit my own post... :/

Now if I increased distance R=0.077m
Pw=0.001 Watts (or = 0dBm)
Or seems to fall within the safety margins...

If I used a Planar Inverted-F antenna, than near field behavior is unlikely isotropic making it even more ambiguous.
Any corrections in my approach would be welcome, as it has been awhile since I encountered the problem.

Cheers,
Rod
Back to top
johnf
Tue Feb 12 2019, 06:21AM
johnf Registered Member #230 Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 08:01PM
Location: Gracefield lower Hutt
Posts: 284
Yep the phone companies know this this is why the inband limit for phones is much higher as they think you are only going to be on it less than 15 minutes per day.
do not stand near one of those masts with the panel antennas for cell big sites are up in the multi kW with all carriers on at once
Back to top
Plasma
Tue Feb 12 2019, 07:14AM
Plasma Registered Member #61406 Joined: Thu Jan 05 2017, 11:31PM
Location:
Posts: 268
Convert dBm to dBi, every 3 dBi you double the distance, work function type things, might not be ionized, its still not enough to release alpha,gamma,xray or beta, so cancer is out, maybe eyes and head have extra heat that will need to be protected from.
Back to top
Uspring
Tue Feb 12 2019, 10:55AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
I don't think you can use the Friis equation to calculate a power density mentioned in the FCC regulation. The Friis equation tells you something about the total power received by an antenna and uses an effective receiving aperture (see Step 4 in the derivation). The power density is given by Step 2.

For an isotropically radiating antenna Gt=1 and the power density is simply the total power Pt divided by the sphere surface 4*pi*R^2, i.e. 50mW/314cm^2 = 0.16mW/cm^2. That's at a distance of 5cm.

Generally antennas don't radiate isotropically, though, a better approxiamtion is a dipole field. That depends much on the type of antenna. Also the near field (R less or around lambda) of the antenna is stronger than the radiative field, so one should account for this too. That's more complicated and has to include interactions of skin and flesh with the antenna near field.

Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Feb 12 2019, 02:25PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
completely anecdotal ...
a friend and colleague of mine used to service and repair equipment in an amateur radio shop,
when amateurs go 'silent key' the family often sell equipment to the shop, and my friend could recognise who's equipment it was as he knew most amateurs in the area.
Talking to relatives he discovered that at least two 2m (typ. 5W@145MHz) walkie-talkie users had cancer in the right side of the head !

Neither of us use handheld transmitters (including cellphones) near our bodies, and especially not near our heads.
I did a little research some years ago;
I believe that ionisation is unlikely,
thermal damage is likely at high power densities,
and MITOSIS can be affected by surprisingly small electric fields.

To add to the confusion, I just found this article Link2
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.