Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 19
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Munkey (31)
CokeCanNinja (30)


Next birthdays
11/25 Chris (39)
11/25 JamesH (17)
11/25 Oakley (21)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Narrow band RF filter options

Move Thread LAN_403
Carbon_Rod
Tue Jan 22 2019, 07:40AM Print
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
I am looking for a tune-able or select-able filter with a very narrow pass-band under 5kHz wide at 1.2 to 2.5 GHz.

Does anyone know of such a device maker?

I am trying to measure orbital Doppler shifts with a homodyne receiver.

Cheers,
Rod
Back to top
2Spoons
Tue Jan 22 2019, 09:45PM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
So you want a filter with a Q of about 500,000.
That seems unlikely to me.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Jan 22 2019, 10:06PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Link2

I've not tried this model but an SDR would work Link2

for a lot more work (tuneable down-converter front end)
you could use the much cheaper usb SDR types Link2

Judging by the older stuff that I have, and the newer stuff available, a cheap SDR for your frequencies of interest should be available soon.

If you are doing relative measurements then the above will work,
if you want absolute measurements then the internal oscillators will not be stable or repeatable enough,
you will need something like a rubidium-based oscillator for the mixer clock(s)
Back to top
Plasma
Tue Jan 22 2019, 10:09PM
Plasma Registered Member #61406 Joined: Thu Jan 05 2017, 11:31PM
Location:
Posts: 268
Would a MOV with some signal basis filter it.
No experience in the above.
Back to top
2Spoons
Tue Jan 22 2019, 11:11PM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
I agree with sulaiman: superhet would be the more practical approach for a narrow band receiver.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Wed Jan 23 2019, 08:30PM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
@2Spoons
superhet is usually better for most types of problems as the fractional bandwidth of a filter design remains nearly the same, but the absolute bandwidth is much more narrow at a lower frequency.

This was not what I'm looking for, but thank you for the replies.
=)
Back to top
johnf
Thu Jan 24 2019, 06:19PM
johnf Registered Member #230 Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 08:01PM
Location: Gracefield lower Hutt
Posts: 284
BAW filters already exist for this, maybe not the desired Q, but cascading slightly differing models would get close
Back to top
Sulaiman
Thu Jan 24 2019, 09:29PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Carbon_Rod wrote ...

I am looking for a tune-able or select-able filter with a very narrow pass-band under 5kHz wide at 1.2 to 2.5 GHz.

Does anyone know of such a device maker?

I am trying to measure orbital Doppler shifts with a homodyne receiver.

Cheers,
Rod
I do not believe that there is such a thing as a very low bandwidth, GHz range, tuneable filter that is practical,
unless frequency mixing is involved.

You are using homodyne detection ?
How ?
Maybe you mean heterodyne ?
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Fri Jan 25 2019, 12:48AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
@johnf
I came to the same conclusion of using bypass signal switching, chaining bpf windows, and managed to find a few sub 10Mhz-ish bw SAW filters that look promising given they overlap the area of interest. Unfortunately, this design also means the insertion losses will necessitate an awful lot wrangling to get it to behave as each stage will need a matching network, and the noise floor may ultimately come up too high to grab the weaker signals.

@Sulaiman
Indeed, some trivial problems can get ridiculous rather quickly. Yet if it were easy it wouldn't be any fun.. I may end up having to stick everything in a temperature controlled oven to keep the tuning stable, but I can only handle one issue at a time.. wink

Cheers,
Rod
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.