Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 28
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
MicroTesla (34)


Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

CAPACITOR-TO-CAPACITOR CHARGING EFFICIENCY LIMITS

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Signification
Thu Dec 03 2015, 12:57PM Print
Signification Registered Member #54278 Joined: Sat Jan 17 2015, 04:42AM
Location: Amite, La.
Posts: 367
I have tried to charge one capacitor from another in various ways, mainly a crude switch or resistor. I have never seen even 50% energy efficiency in the transfer. Is there some kind of Joule efficiency limit in this type of charge transfer? Does anyone know of a way to get >50% direct transfer of energy between even two 'identical' caps?
Back to top
klugesmith
Thu Dec 03 2015, 02:24PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Yes, but it's all about conservation of charge.

As a simple example, let C1 and C2 be identical 1 F capacitors sharing a ground terminal.
Initial voltage are 1 and 0 volts. Charges (Q=CV) are 1 and 0 coulomb.
Energies (E=CV*2/2) are 1/2 and 0 joule; total energy 1/2 joule.

As charge moves from C1 to C2, there's a point where each capacitor has 1/2 of the charge, at 1/2 volt.
Energies are 1/8 joule per capacitor, 1/4 joule total.
It's the minimum energy static state; we could leave the capacitors connected together.

If charge continues to move in the same direction, eventually all of it is on C2 and none on C1.
We are back to the initial 1/2 joule of energy, all on C2.
But it takes work to move charge from a lower to higher voltage.

We can move most (ideally, 100%) of the initial energy from C1 to C2 by making the connection through an inductor.
Close the switch for just 1/2 cycle of the RLC (ideally, LC) resonant frequency.
At mid-transfer, when the voltages are equal, the "missing" energy is stored in the inductor.
How long would the whole transfer take with an ideal 1 henry inductor?
Back to top
DerAlbi
Thu Dec 03 2015, 03:32PM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
You have found the "Capacitor Paradoxon" (just google it)
Half the energy is wasted inevitably in the ESR. (if there was no ESR the current would be infinite. thats impossible too, so dont even start a theoretical case without ESR)
The way to go is to make the resistance imaginary as klugesmith stated by using an inductor (and i would like to add a diode to prevent oscillation).
Back to top
BigBad
Thu Dec 03 2015, 05:51PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Signification wrote ...

I have tried to charge one capacitor from another in various ways, mainly a crude switch or resistor. I have never seen even 50% energy efficiency in the transfer. Is there some kind of Joule efficiency limit in this type of charge transfer? Does anyone know of a way to get >50% direct transfer of energy between even two 'identical' caps?
Yes, you can get very high efficiency.

In fact there's a name for this device, and there's probably several in your house right now: switch mode power supply wink

If you think about it, in a switch mode power supply after the rectifier there's a capacitor on the input and there a capacitor on the output, and the charge goes from one... to the other.
Back to top
DerAlbi
Thu Dec 03 2015, 06:22PM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
No no no nooooh smile In an insulated power supply the charge does not really "go" from one to the other due to the lack of a path wink
BigBad metapher tongue
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Thu Dec 03 2015, 09:25PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
DerAlbi wrote ...

You have found the "Capacitor Paradoxon" (just google it)
Half the energy is wasted inevitably in the ESR. (if there was no ESR the current would be infinite. thats impossible too, so dont even start a theoretical case without ESR)
The way to go is to make the resistance imaginary as klugesmith stated by using an inductor (and i would like to add a diode to prevent oscillation).
I can do a theoretical simulation with no series resistance and no problem at all.
The current never gets infinite.
I just add an inductor to the system.
Back to top
BigBad
Thu Dec 03 2015, 09:36PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
DerAlbi wrote ...

No no no nooooh smile In an insulated power supply the charge does not really "go" from one to the other due to the lack of a path wink
BigBad metapher tongue
Not all switch mode power supplies are isolated. Check out buck converters and boost converters.
Back to top
DerAlbi
Thu Dec 03 2015, 10:52PM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
Bored Chemist: what simulation?? Does the current not go to infinite without the inductor? Or do you add the inductor to make the simulation run??
Very confusing statement. Are you just troling? cheesey I mean.. we all know that simlation programs have mechanism in place to resolve such situations. (like default ESR in LTSpice or a finite minimal time step)
Back to top
BigBad
Fri Dec 04 2015, 12:24AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
DerAlbi wrote ...

No no no nooooh smile In an insulated power supply the charge does not really "go" from one to the other due to the lack of a path wink
BigBad metapher tongue
Electrons are indistinguishable at the quantum mechanical level anyway tongue

Electrons can quantum tunnel, swap over, and quantum tunnel back and you never know they've done it... and they actually do this.
Back to top
DerAlbi
Fri Dec 04 2015, 11:12AM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
Ahahahaaa BigBad i hit a nerve. cheesey Dont bother, i was just trolling.. No need to defend yourself. It was a good example, no worries.. but this obvious flaw.. excuse me, i couldnt hold back shades

What would be really mean at this point would be mentioning that charge pumps can have a near 100%-efficiency with resistive switches only. amazed
Now your minds boggle! amazed
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.