Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 42
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Three phase transformer winding question

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. H.
Wed Apr 22 2015, 09:32AM Print
Dr. H. Registered Member #931 Joined: Mon Jul 30 2007, 05:25PM
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 486
Hi guys,

for the mill I am making, the spindle motor I found is a 24V at 150+Amps. So naturally the problem is providing that power. I've found a pre-wound 5kVa 3 phase transformer - but for around 100V output voltage. The secondary will be rewound for the needed voltage/amperage.

The primary is connected in star configuration, the center will be grounded. The question is how to wind the secondary - in delta or in star. I will be using a 3 phase rectifier after that and around 60mF capacitance.

If it is configured in Delta - the current in each of the secondary will decrease (but more windings will be needed). Also the 3rd harmonic is suppressed better. So I think it is the better choice.

Am I missing something fundamental here ? 3 phase is mister for me. Is the star connection better in any way for this application ?

Cheers
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Wed Apr 22 2015, 11:28AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Star will allow you fewer turns on the secondary for the same output voltage after the rectifier, so may be easier to wind. However you will be using fat wire so this advantage may be moot. The cente-tap used in the star config allows you an easier analysis of how your bridge recitifier is working, so that's the 'obvious' one to go for. It also allows you to use the phases unbalanced for other things, like powering some electronics, again the simpler choice to make. If you connect three star windings wrongly, the load doesn't see the full voltage. If you connect three delta windings wrongly, the transformer smokes. I think star is winning 3-0.

You can be clever in several ways. a) Configure your 3 windings in delta OR star switchable to give you root(3) difference in output voltage. b) Wind a delta set AND a star set, and use a 3 phase bridge rectifier on both. With the right ratio of windings, you have a '12 pulse' recitifier which gives you very little ripple, rather than the '6 pulse' rectifier using one set alone (ordinary single phase gives you a 2 pulse recitifier for comparison). Lower ripple means less heating in your motor, slightly, the difference may not be worth having. See wikipedia rectifiers.

Don't worry too much about harmonic distortion, unless you are selling equipment to a spec. Both delta, and star with no connection to the star point, refuse to allow 3rd and 3N harmonic currents to flow. It's only an issue when a supplier puts a flimsy neutral connection in, as it will carry 'little current' when the balanced load currents subtract in the neutral, and then sees it overheat when all the loads draw a large 3rd harmonic current waveform which adds in the neutral conductor.
Back to top
Dr. H.
Wed Apr 22 2015, 12:04PM
Dr. H. Registered Member #931 Joined: Mon Jul 30 2007, 05:25PM
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 486
Hi Dr. Slack,

Thank you for your helpful reply. I liked the point with "no smoke" cheesey

Making multiple sets of winding is a bit too much, but I definitely liked this one:

Dr. Slack wrote ...

b) Wind a delta set AND a star set, and use a 3 phase bridge rectifier on both. With the right ratio of windings, you have a '12 pulse' recitifier which gives you very little ripple, rather than the '6 pulse' rectifier using one set alone.

I guess this is due to the 30 degree phase shift when you have a star-delta configuration ?

Dr. Slack wrote ...

Both delta, and star with no connection to the star point, refuse to allow 3rd and 3N harmonic currents to flow. It's only an issue when a supplier puts a flimsy neutral connection in, as it will carry 'little current' when the balanced load currents subtract in the neutral, and then sees it overheat when all the loads draw a large 3rd harmonic current waveform which adds in the neutral conductor.


I couldn't understand the above - so not to have a 3rd harmonic you need to use a thick neutral wire or leave it floating ?!

I was planning to connect the center of the primary star to neutral, and was wondering what to do with the secondary star center ?

Cheers

Back to top
Dr. Slack
Wed Apr 22 2015, 03:05PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Dr. H. wrote ...

Dr. Slack wrote ...

Both delta, and star with no connection to the star point, refuse to allow 3rd and 3N harmonic currents to flow. It's only an issue when a supplier puts a flimsy neutral connection in, as it will carry 'little current' when the balanced load currents subtract in the neutral, and then sees it overheat when all the loads draw a large 3rd harmonic current waveform which adds in the neutral conductor.


I couldn't understand the above - so not to have a 3rd harmonic you need to use a thick neutral wire or leave it floating ?!

I was planning to connect the center of the primary star to neutral, and was wondering what to do with the secondary star center ?

Cheers



*You* don't have a problem with 3rd harmonic, the supply company does. If you, and the rest of the district, throw too much back at them, then their neutrals could overheat, if the neutrals are sized assuming a reasonable degree of phase balance. So you can pretty much forget about 3rd harmonic as a domestic user. Because it causes the supply company problems, there is often a limit on how much 3rd harmonic commerically sold equipment is allowed to fling back. That's why power factor correction electronics is becoming more prevalent, it's mandatory on loads above, I think, 300W, in many jurisctictions. A capacitor input rectifier, because it only conducts at the peak of the waveform, is good at causing bad 3rd harmonic.

If you don't sell stuff, then who's going to know? Your few amps of 3rd is not going to embarass any supply transformers. You might, out of the goodness of your heart, put a bit of inductance in the phases to improve the power factor by increasing the conduction angle. However, that improves high harmonics first, you need a lot of inductance to make any improvement in 3rd, so it's not really worth it.

You connect the secondary star to (a) the approrpiate point on your output caps. If, as is typical, you generate +/- supplies and have 6 caps, 3+ve, 3-ve, then the neutral star connects to the centre tap of these, the 0v connection . Then, (b) you need to decide what secondary earthing practice you use, where you connect your output 0v to. The transformer provides isolation. You could leave 0v floating, or you could connect it to a ground spike, or to mains earth. All three have their merits, it depends on the particular circumstances which is best to use.
Back to top
Dr. H.
Thu Apr 23 2015, 07:53AM
Dr. H. Registered Member #931 Joined: Mon Jul 30 2007, 05:25PM
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 486
Thank you for your nice feedback.

I guess I will go with the star configuration on the secondary. smile

Best Regards
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Thu Apr 23 2015, 10:58AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
It occurs to me that perhaps I have over-sold the star to 0v configuration. There is quite a lot of ripple on each of the +ve and -ve, each is fed by a 3-pulse rectifier. However, these pulses are anti-phased, and the differential output from +ve to -ve has the much lower 6 pulse ripple.

So the avilability of the centre tap is more of a convenience for other circuitry.
Back to top
Dr. H.
Thu Apr 23 2015, 01:03PM
Dr. H. Registered Member #931 Joined: Mon Jul 30 2007, 05:25PM
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 486
The biggest advantage of the Delta configuration is that the phase current decreases (Iph = I(line)/sqrt(3) .... so this is quite a lot for this application
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Thu Apr 23 2015, 04:04PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Dr. H. wrote ...

The biggest advantage of the Delta configuration is that the phase current decreases (Iph = I(line)/sqrt(3) .... so this is quite a lot for this application

I'm not sure I understand what you're asserting here? You would not be saying that like for like, for the same line input voltage, and rectifier output power, that the delta configuration achieves a factor of 1.732 lower current consumption. That would mean such a collossal difference in efficiency that star would never be used. So it must be something else.
Back to top
hen918
Thu Apr 23 2015, 04:53PM
hen918 Registered Member #11591 Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
Dr. Slack wrote ...

Dr. H. wrote ...

The biggest advantage of the Delta configuration is that the phase current decreases (Iph = I(line)/sqrt(3) .... so this is quite a lot for this application

I'm not sure I understand what you're asserting here? You would not be saying that like for like, for the same line input voltage, and rectifier output power, that the delta configuration achieves a factor of 1.732 lower current consumption. That would mean such a collossal difference in efficiency that star would never be used. So it must be something else.

In star, the windings are put two in series phase to phase with 0V in the middle. In delta, only one winding goes between the phases, and so has a greater volts per turn and greater voltage. If the voltage increases, the current decreases, to the extent that Dr. H described.
Back to top
Dr. H.
Fri Apr 24 2015, 05:36AM
Dr. H. Registered Member #931 Joined: Mon Jul 30 2007, 05:25PM
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 486
Hi guys

here is a good explanation of what I mean about the decreased phase current - Link2

I am still looking for opinions what I should use smile

Best Regards
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.