If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #79
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 11:35AM
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 673
Ok, all you stargazers. I'm a serious noobie to astronomy, although I've been interested all my life. After much frustration with the equipment I have, I've got some questions.
First of all, I want to be able to see galaxies, planets, nebulae and the like and have them look like something other than a bouncing annoying dot. That's my goal. I also want to photograph them and I don't want to spend a buttload of money.
1. So, already I have pretty much everything I need to make a 200mm Newtonian reflector, and I'm going to make the mirror's speed somewhere around f/5 to f/6. Should this be a good scope provided I build it correctly? Any suggestions?
2. I've got a Wal-Mart refractor (something like 2"-2.5" lens f/ must be around 10.) It seems to be useless for looking at anything other than the moon (I think I prefer my binos), am I correct or am I just using it improperly? Is there anything cool I can look at with it while I'm building my "biggin'"?
3. Does anyone know a good place to get my mirror aluminized? Unfortunately, my vacuum chamber doesn't go that low.
Registered Member #15
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
wrote ...
First of all, I want to be able to see galaxies, planets, nebulae and the like and have them look like something other than a bouncing annoying dot. That's my goal. I also want to photograph them and I don't want to spend a buttload of money.
To be honest, if thats your goal, you'll need to do solely astrophotography. Even a 30" scope will merely show galaxies and nebulas as bouncing grey fuzzies with the exception of the few brightest nebula / galaxies. To see color and detail, you'll need to do astrophotography.
And sorry to say, if you want to shoot galaxies, nebulas, it really is one of those hobbies where you'll definitely need to spend a "boatload" of money and time, and the learning curve is probably the steepest of any hobby i've ever done. Of course, its super fun!
However, if you are interested in astrophotography, the best way to start is shooting regular shots on a fixed tripod or even build a homemade barndoor mount which tracks the sky for widefield shots.
wrote ...
1. So, already I have pretty much everything I need to make a 200mm Newtonian reflector, and I'm going to make the mirror's speed somewhere around f/5 to f/6. Should this be a good scope provided I build it correctly? Any suggestions?
By 200mm, i assume you mean the aperture size. At f/5 this would give you a focal length of about 1000mm. This should be a good scope. Also, don't limit yourself to a newtonian. A dobsian would be a good choice as well.
Now, if you don't wish to build one, Orion Telescopes makes some VERY HIGH QUALITY for the price scopes which are an excellent deal for newbie astronomers. For example, you can get a complete 6" aperture Dobsian with mount for $259.00 ! ! ! And its a QUALITY scope. They are chinese made, but they rivial performance of scopes costing 10x as much.
2. I've got a Wal-Mart refractor (something like 2"-2.5" lens f/ must be around 10.) It seems to be useless for looking at anything other than the moon (I think I prefer my binos), am I correct or am I just using it improperly? Is there anything cool I can look at with it while I'm building my "biggin'"?
You are DEFINITELY using the scope incorrectly. The correct way to use this Wal-Mart refractor is . . .
1. Grab scope by end 2. Raise over head 3. Smash on ground as hard as possible
I'm not joking either. Get rid of it - its a piece of trash and will leave you more frustrated than anything.
wrote ...
3. Does anyone know a good place to get my mirror aluminized? Unfortunately, my vacuum chamber doesn't go that low.
Check some telescope building forums such as Cloudy Nights forum.
wrote ...
4. Finally, what's the coolest stuff to look at?
Well, without a doubt the coolest thing to look at is of course the Moon. But make sure its NOT full otherwise you won't see many surface features.
Next, the planets. Jupiter (which is basically out of season now), but Saturn is rising a bit after midnight now
Here is a list of the FALL OBJECTS which should be most spectacular (northern hemisphere of course)
Trifid Nebula, Lagoon Nebula, Eagle Nebula M13 Globular in Hercules Epsylon Lyrae - the famous Double-Double star (definitely a MUST) M57 Ring Nebula in Lyrae Pleiades Cluster Double Cluster in Perseus (a gem to behold) M31, M32, M110 Galaxies in Andromeda Dumbell Nebula
For WINTER OBJECTS
M41, Orion Nebula Pleiades M81, M82 Crab Nebula Several clusters in Auriga
I won't tell you where they are, you'll have to find them yourself as thats the most fun of it!
Registered Member #56
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
I can vouch for those telecsope.com scopes, I have a (I believe) 5" refelctor that has served me well for many years. I can say that their tracking motors are teh sux0r. We spent >20 hours messing with it trying to get it to do its alignemnt when we finaly called celestron to complain, and then they notified us that they have the wrong scale value for the motor and to type in this code. After that it sorta works, but it doesn't know that it isn't allowed to point strait up/down, so if you pick the wrong star it jams and you have to start over. But even when it is woring correctly the t-scope has to be perfectly ballanced on the gymbal or it can't move on the slow speed, it slowly drifts off the target, and it has a ton of backlash in the gears (like a while field of view at high mag).
It works great for looking at saturn, you can clearley see the rings etc. I haven't really had much luck loking at really distant objects, and with the poor tracking I think you will run into trouble doing the uber long exposures...
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.