If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2529
Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
I was toying with the idea of making a circular railgun. I figure if you bend the rails around in a near circle, and used a ball bearing for the projectile it could get up to a fair speed.
It might be possible to do it in the bottom of a jam jar and use aluminium foil for the contacts. You need rigid sides to minimise rolling resistance.
If there's a scoopy thing, perhaps I could use an electromagnet to time the release and fire it out the scoop when it reaches top speed by sliding it over a bit maybe.
Registered Member #2906
Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
A railgun is a device that is particulary known for its wear and tear of its rails. I do not think that you could use aluminum foil for contacting. the movement alone will produce plasma/arcs that will consume your foil in no time, dont you think?
Even with just placing a ball on 2 parallel wires will make the thing practically questionable. It will kind of float on its plasma and since the ball is not restrained down with pressure the contact will be horible. I dont know if you ever watched a trams wheels on the rails.. even with that pressure you sometimes see it arcing.
But yeah: interesting idea. you are practically limited by radial forces only and you could have a quite long acceleration distance in a good form factor. the increase of speed will actually put some pressure on the rails... hmmh. First electromagnetic accelerator with an inherently spinning projectile haha
Registered Member #3215
Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
totally imaginary concept but very related... if you have a torus in which the interior had two conductive zones acting like rails, and a bead of mercury which would act as the shell, would it accelerate and evaporate and form a rotating plasma in the torus?
I guess the conductive rails would have to be superconductive and contain nothing but the mercury
accelerating a projectile would be easily achieved in a circular accelerator, but for a railgun it would be really difficult to design a mechanical path disconnection which would be applicable at such speeds
Registered Member #42796
Joined: Mon Jan 13 2014, 06:34PM
Location:
Posts: 195
first alot of force will be wasted in the radial direction 2nd the above looses depends highly on the radius - the smaller the radius the bigger the looses - to such extent that at a certain radius the projectile would stop inside the loop or even burst through the rails
also the projectile will move in a straight line after leaving the gurved rails - so no curve the bullet still remains in the fiction world :)
if you have the materials build it regardless of how counterintuitive it sounds
Registered Member #2529
Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
DerAlbi wrote ...
A railgun is a device that is particulary known for its wear and tear of its rails. I do not think that you could use aluminum foil for contacting. the movement alone will produce plasma/arcs that will consume your foil in no time, dont you think?
The thing is the current is a lot lower, with a normal railgun you need super high current to get decent speed before the end of the rail, with this you can go around lots of times at lower acceleration.
You're still going to need to wind up the voltage though, the top speed of a railgun is limited by the back emf of the rotor; it's actually a form of universal motor.
Sulaiman wrote ...
the principle sounds workable but in a glass jar ?!
how about something like model railway track glued to the inside of a pvc pipe?
PVC is really too soft, you'll get lots of rolling friction; you need something really hard like steel or glass.
wrote ...
first alot of force will be wasted in the radial direction
No, the radial isn't (directly) lossy. The friction force is lossy; which is proportional with the rolling friction (and the radial force.) For steel on steel or steel on glass, that's going to be pretty high.
wrote ...
2nd the above looses depends highly on the radius - the smaller the radius the bigger the looses - to such extent that at a certain radius the projectile would stop inside the loop or even burst through the rails
Yes you probably wouldn't want two rails with a gap between them; although if the ball bearing weighs a gram and the g-force is a 1000, then that's only a kilogram force; 10 N.
wrote ...
also the projectile will move in a straight line after leaving the gurved rails - so no curve the bullet still remains in the fiction world :)
I think that's rather the point if we can work out how to do the release mechanism! ;)
Registered Member #3215
Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
lower current times the number of passes required to achieve the wanted speed... as soon as friction damage from much more passes does not exceed one high power shot damage yes, but I don't think that would be the case
Registered Member #3215
Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
I think that due to current flow, movement and conduction losses at the interface would induce more stress and ablation with multiple passes at a low voltage/power than one pass at high voltage/power
You can always use a kind of conductive lubricant like graphite, on rails in a material which produces a conductive oxidation layer
I could well be wrong as I have no practical experience in railguns ;)
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.