Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 69
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Ultra7 (54)
uitvinderalex (36)


Next birthdays
09/29 Ultra7 (54)
09/29 uitvinderalex (36)
09/30 Terrorhertz (15)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

black holes...again

Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Fri Oct 10 2014, 03:36AM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I recently read an article that some physicists don't think black holes stay in existence too long. That is, black holes do not exist. Everyday, though, I keep hearing the physics community talk about black holes.

Is this reference legit? The article says the journal is NOT peer reviewed, so I can only guess there is something fishy here.
Link2
Back to top
Conundrum
Fri Oct 10 2014, 04:18AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
Hmm.
Geometric solutions that do not take into account turbulence and asymmetry are mathematically correct but not always consistent with real world physics.

That said, neutron stars have been revealed to have internal structure going down to the subatomic level so it is possible black holes actually do have internal geometry that isn't visible from the outside of the event horizon.
Back to top
Uspring
Fri Oct 10 2014, 08:16AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
Current consensus is, that black holes don't live forever and decay by Hawking radiation. That is a _very_ slow process for massive black holes, e.g. on the order of 10^60 years. This doesn't imply, that they don't exist. The problem of information loss is circumvented by postulating, that the Hawking radiation contains the "lost" information. There are huge theoretical problems, though, of getting quantum mechanics to be consistent with general relativity.

Life time of miniature black holes is predicted to be much shorter. This has been one of the arguments, why hypothetically produced mini holes by the large hadron collider would evaporate a long time before they could accrete more mass to become dangerous.
Back to top
dexter
Fri Oct 10 2014, 09:25AM
dexter Registered Member #42796 Joined: Mon Jan 13 2014, 06:34PM
Location:
Posts: 195
Uspring wrote ...

hypothetically produced mini holes by the large hadron collider would evaporate a long time before they could accrete more mass to become dangerous.

back then when it was a hot topic someone calculated that such a black hole ignoring the very very short life would take 10k - 100k years of swallowing enough matter to become dangerous
Link2
Back to top
BigBad
Fri Oct 10 2014, 04:12PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
I strongly suspect that the research isn't complete.

The current understanding of black holes seems to be shifting from:

a black hole forms -> event horizon + singularity at the centre

to:

a black hole forms -> firewall forms + flat spacetime inside that

They would both look the same from the outside, but if you fell in, you would hit the firewall (consists of Hawking radiation, and similar) and get fried and spread over the surface of the black hole and the black hole would get a bit bigger.

The thing that hasn't been worked out yet is how the firewall forms and exactly how it stays stable, but this seems to be the only really workable explanation of the known physics and observations right now. But there's no consensus yet, and this paper is part of physicists trying to work it out.
Back to top
Uspring
Sat Oct 11 2014, 08:46AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
They would both look the same from the outside,
and

The thing that hasn't been worked out yet is how the firewall forms and exactly how it stays stable, but this seems to be the only really workable explanation of the known physics and observations right now.
don't seem to reconcile. Nobody has been in a black hole.
Back to top
BigBad
Sat Oct 11 2014, 07:17PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Nobody will ever have been in a black hole.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Sun Oct 12 2014, 01:29AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
Any rational explanation is plausible without falsifiable assertions. However, most of these theories will never be scientifically accurate without experimental or observational proof. While Hawking radiation emissions have been observed, it still does not prove the underlying phenomena match speculative models.

Some of Hawking's work is reminiscent of this fellow:
“Distortion of Truth by Association”
Link2
wink
Back to top
BigBad
Sun Oct 12 2014, 06:18PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Well, yeah, I'd take the opinions of a drug pusher on that.

Firewalls are covered here: Link2

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.