Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 89
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Neutron scintillation detector.

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Tue Apr 29 2014, 05:56AM Print
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Just after a cursor search of facts, it appears with a normal scintillator plastic detector, gamma exclusion is the real problem.

link to previous thread: Link2
bismuth ? Link2

Is lead (or any high mass shielding) the only way to selectively exclude false (non-neutron) flashes?
If I put 1 cm of scintillating plastic, surrounded by 5 cm of lead I could exclude 90% of the gamma, and insignificant neutron quantity. But a 10cm diameter lead ball doesn't sound light in mass. In fact if I drop it from 300 feet up, I bet it could kill.

Is there any clever way to deal with this? Or are neutron detectors just kinda at this disadvantage in general?

EDIT: 5.8kg =12.7lbs, crap on a stick

NOTE TO SELF: look up lithium iodide in the morning.
Back to top
dude_500
Wed May 07 2014, 03:10AM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
ZnS:Ag is a common neutron scintillator material that has very low gamma sensitivity. You generally wouldn't even need to worry about gamma shielding. The construction is often referred to as a Hornyak button. Bicron makes some of these neutron detectors.

In general though, he3 tubes are preferred for neutron detection. When biased properly you can easily discriminate non-neutron counts out simply because they have a much lower amplitude.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed May 07 2014, 04:07AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
dude_500 wrote ...

ZnS:Ag is a common neutron scintillator material that has very low gamma sensitivity. You generally wouldn't even need to worry about gamma shielding. The construction is often referred to as a Hornyak button. Bicron makes some of these neutron detectors.

In general though, he3 tubes are preferred for neutron detection. When biased properly you can easily discriminate non-neutron counts out simply because they have a much lower amplitude.
never heard this let me research this further! this is why i post here on 4hv.
Back to top
Conundrum
Wed May 07 2014, 04:44AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
Should work. Also, one idea I came up with for shielding is layering bismuth and pyrolytic graphite but applying a transverse voltage, should work.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed May 07 2014, 05:11AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Conundrum wrote ...

Should work. Also, one idea I came up with for shielding is layering bismuth and pyrolytic graphite but applying a transverse voltage, should work.

Please elaborate... are you using a e-field to disrupt the EM wave?!
Back to top
Conundrum
Wed May 07 2014, 05:24PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
Possibly, there is a NASA paper from the late 1980's concerning superconductors being used as a radiation shield. It seems that the secret is to deflect the gammas and X-rays rather than absorb them, same sort of idea as a metamaterial I guess.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed May 07 2014, 06:50PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
What sort of nuclear industrial accident from small spill or leak to actual meltdown would need neutron detection to manage it?

The pocket dosimeters used throughout the nuclear industry worldwide detect gammas and energetic betas only.

My advice: don't waste your time on this neutron red herring.

Use a common miniature GM dosimetry tube like ZP1313, or if you want to go solid state, use a PIN photodiode like BPX65, which has been used in some miniature dosimeter designs since the 1980s.

The miniature GM tube has the advantage of low cost and simple circuitry which you can expect to work well right away. It also offers excellent immunity to destruction by intense ionizing radiation, where a PIN photodiode might suffer irreversible changes.

Back to top
Patrick
Sat May 10 2014, 01:11AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Proud Mary wrote ...

What sort of nuclear industrial accident from small spill or leak to actual meltdown would need neutron detection to manage it?

The pocket dosimeters used throughout the nuclear industry worldwide detect gammas and energetic betas only.

My advice: don't waste your time on this neutron red herring.

Use a common miniature GM dosimetry tube like ZP1313, or if you want to go solid state, use a PIN photodiode like BPX65, which has been used in some miniature dosimeter designs since the 1980s.

The miniature GM tube has the advantage of low cost and simple circuitry which you can expect to work well right away. It also offers excellent immunity to destruction by intense ionizing radiation, where a PIN photodiode might suffer irreversible changes.


So i was presuming in reactor related accidents the presence or absence of Neutron emission can be indicitive of how bad a reactor "event" is.
Is it a mere 3 mile island or the next Chernobyl...


Back to top
Conundrum
Sat May 10 2014, 10:36AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
The problem here is that core damage will generate a similar number of neutrons as a melt-down, so without further information is just tells you things are bad or not.
Directed beams of gammas IMHO are a more accurate way to tell, as this suggests a full melt-down is imminent or in progress.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat May 10 2014, 11:38AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
If it was my problem, I would choose a PIN diode gamma ray spectrometer. The PIN diode array, its charge amplifiers, and telemetry modulator drivers would weigh very little. The Multichannel Analyzer (MCA) at the ground station would, with suitable software, directly identify the radionuclides responsible.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.