If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #3215
Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
hi,
do someone have any knowledge about metal detection coil topology (apart from detector types and pancakes/star pattern)?
I'm searching for some resource like field pattern, field collimation, coil size versus field depth and shape
I've got several ideas involving TV deflection yokes to manipulate magnetic pulses generated at its focal point for either scanning or narrowing of the generated field, but have too little understanding of these phenomenons
can anyone direct me? I'll share designs if usable things come out of it
Registered Member #96
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Hi, google "pulse induction" I've made BFO (beat frequency) detectors before, its basically an AM radio receiver with two local oscillators. The pulse induction variety use the effect of transfer of energy between as Tx and Rx coil, various people have tried the approach of hybridising a metglas based sensor with a PI detector to work around the sensitivity to iron that plagues all systems.
Did you try using FEMM? I've had a go on this, it is very useful and there is a lively online community.
Registered Member #3215
Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
I know about topologies and techniques, I'm just trying to improve pulse selectivity over object types and maybe scanning to achieve sonar-like imaging
I'll have a look at FEMM I didn't remember this so many thanks for pointing this to me
I live over an ancient 1800's battleground where thousands of objects still lie underground, and I have always wanted to play a bit with metal detection
Apart from digging existing designs which is easy I want to design my own system under an original approach, starting from scratch as it usually produces the best results when you want to find new techniques
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Never mind coil topologies, do you understand the many different modes by which 'metal detection' systems can work?
For induction type detectors, one or more test coils couple into a remote object, in order to detect some effect. The effect is complex (as in real + imag complex). Detectors that work by off-tuning a resonance are detecting mainly the imag part. Detectors that work by quenching an oscillator are detecting the real part. Single coil designs are essentially reflectometers, whereas two coil designs measure some aspect of transmission.
Pulses have a wider frequency range than single carrier types, which can improve contrast. In order to sort metal from soil, what you need is contrast. In the limit, ground penetrating radar is just very high frequency used for target illumination. Unfortunately you need to operate wideband to detect the broad range of frequencies from a pulse, which raises your background noise.
Having worked in the related industry of food and medicine metal detection (companies really don't like getting sued for bits of stainless sieve-wire ending up in their baby-food), choosing an imaging mode that improves the stability of the background signal (the food, or the soil) is as or more important than maximising the return of the target.
Then there are DC magnetometers, which detect only ferrous metals, won't do for lead musket balls, but would work really well for muskets. Proton precession is a very sensitive way to do that.
Then there is ground conductivity, which can detect not only bulk metal by its conductivity, but also the conductivity of soil moisture contaminated by leaching from buried solids.
Now here's the interesting bit for you. Almost all detectors were designed before modern electronics. The use of BFOs is a clumsy old way for detecting a change in frequency, you might do better today with ADC+DSP. Pulses are an old-fashioned way of getting a wider frequency range. If you use a DDS for the source and correlate the received signal with your transmitted signal, a chirp for instance, you can synthesise a wide frequency range and small noise bandwidth at the same time, to improve your SNR. Most proton precession designs I've seen use counters. I routinely use FFT methods orders of magnitude more sensitive. If you want to find new techniques, you might want to start from the coupling theory, assume the availability of cheap low noise RF amplifiers, ADCs, and say a raspberry PI for FFTs, presentation and GPS etc.
Amateur detectors are used in a 'I'll sweep it about in front of me until I get a signal' way, which really means you need detection thresholds suitable for a 'one hit' answer. Unless those thresholds are very high, you will be overwhelmed by false positives. What the pros do is multi-modal mapping. Using GPS, record a map of soil conductivity, of DC magnetic field, of real and imaginary part of coupling over a wide frequency range. Then back at the ranch, super-impose all of them on your computer. I won't labour the advantages of this approach.
Back to your original question, coil topology. Once you know what mode you are trying to couple into, and polarisation, and if high impedance electrostatically shielded (without a shorting turn), and if susceptible to external source pickup a balanced dipole or multipole design for the receive coil, all coil designs come down to area, orientation and impedance. The use of exotic geometries is just for people who don't understand the basics trying different things to see what happens, or posing with their fashionable new star-shaped design.
Registered Member #96
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Interesting. Add to that list measurement of ambient radiation, which should read Th232 and other primordial isotopes in the soil. With a sufficiently sensitive detector it could act as an "X-ray" imager without the ionising radiation source normally needed
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Conundrum wrote ...
Interesting. Add to that list measurement of ambient radiation, which should read Th232 and other primordial isotopes in the soil. With a sufficiently sensitive detector it could act as an "X-ray" imager without the ionising radiation source normally needed
-A
Radiation, neat idea. Add to that surface temperature. At different times of the daily heating cycle, varying thermal conductivity and thermal capacity across the ground will give a usable contrast. However, with those two imaging methods, you're maybe more likely to pick up big structures rather than small metal artefacts. Unless the bit of metal itself is radioactive for some reason.
Registered Member #3215
Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
I was planning on sending a square chirp to generate enough harmonics to be able to DSP rich fast fouriers and match them to pre-recorded templates, which would also allow for easy ground noise suppression
Aside that, I was thinking about TV deflection yokes to either focus the field and modify covering, or raster scan
Registered Member #96
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Yet another use for a quantum sensor, if my PG would turn up already. Quantum sensor based detectors can be an order of magnitude more sensitive than the best end window tubes, and it is possible to enhance this still further by using PG coated with scintillator on the back and a conventional photodiode as the detector..
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.