Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 62
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

What are your thoughts on this presentation on the concepts of electricity?

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Hazel1919
Sun Jul 29 2012, 01:15PM Print
Hazel1919 Registered Member #1376 Joined: Wed Mar 05 2008, 08:31AM
Location:
Posts: 49
Dear all, I am interested in your opinions on the following video.

Link2

I thought it was very interesting, regarding the history of the subject and how these ideas were formulated.

On a side note, does anyone know how I can get hold of 'A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity' by E.T. Whittaker? I have checked Ebay and scribed and amazon.

Back to top
Avalanche
Sun Jul 29 2012, 06:09PM
Avalanche Registered Member #103 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:16PM
Location: Derby, UK
Posts: 845
Haven't watched the video, but you got me searching for the book because I hadn't heard of it, there's a PDF here - Link2
Back to top
Mattski
Sun Jul 29 2012, 06:55PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
At 4 hours long you won't find many (if any) people here willing to watch the video. Dollard seems to be your run of the mill pseudo-scientist who thinks that there are problems with accepted classical electromagnetic theory but doesn't have any data to prove it =/
Back to top
Chip Fixes
Sun Jul 29 2012, 09:36PM
Chip Fixes Registered Member #3781 Joined: Sat Mar 26 2011, 02:25AM
Location:
Posts: 701
you might try searching on google books
Back to top
Hazel1919
Mon Jul 30 2012, 07:51AM
Hazel1919 Registered Member #1376 Joined: Wed Mar 05 2008, 08:31AM
Location:
Posts: 49
Avalanche and Camp Badger, thank you so much. It turns out that Google books has it! This is apparently an important book for anyone who want's to gain a deeper understanding of the electrical phenomena because it details all the experiments and observations from the time of Plato to the first quarter of the 20th century, now that is a broad scope! You can see how they went about there observations and experiments too.

Mattski, do you feel there are no problems with accepted classical electromagnetism?

One of the points I gleaned from this presentation is that 'electricity' flows, not through wires or metals, but between the two wires, where the magnetic lines of force form concentric circles around the wires and the electric lines of force terminate on points on the wire (what you would call protons and electrons).

Link2,r:12,s:79,i:43
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Jul 30 2012, 09:32AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Plasma wrote ...

One of the points I gleaned from this presentation is that 'electricity' flows, not through wires or metals, but between the two wires, where the magnetic lines of force form concentric circles around the wires and the electric lines of force terminate on points on the wire (what you would call protons and electrons).

This is correct, if by "electricity" you mean electric power. It's all in Maxwell's equations and the Poynting vector.

Classical electromagnetism has well-known shortcomings, but none of them is apparent with energy levels achievable in the home wink The problems are in how it fits together, or fails to, with quantum mechanics and gravity.
Back to top
Uspring
Mon Jul 30 2012, 03:34PM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
Classical electromagnetism has well-known shortcomings, but none of them is apparent with energy levels achievable in the home The problems are in how it fits together, or fails to, with quantum mechanics and gravity.
Classical electromagnetism and quantum theory are quite happily married together in quantum electrodynamics, which is probably the most successful and accurate theory in physics altogether. One might have some issues with renormalisation.

Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Jul 30 2012, 04:01PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I have an issue with renormalisation: it's ugly smile However I'm no physicist and wouldn't know where to start coming up with something better.
Back to top
Mattski
Mon Jul 30 2012, 04:36PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Plasma wrote ...

Mattski, do you feel there are no problems with accepted classical electromagnetism?
Much like classical mechanics, classical electromagnetism seems to be the correct model for phenomena which do not fall into the quantum or relativistic domains. Actually magnetism is consistent with special relativity applied to electrostatics but there may still be other relativistic effects on EM. Perhaps someday these domains will all be unified, but even if/when they are classical analysis will likely still dominate as it works fine for most problems.

I skimmed over various articles by and about Dollard which explain his ideas on "dielectricity", scalar waves, and longitudinal waves, and attempt to apply these to Tesla coils and wireless energy. I didn't notice anything which explained a phenomenon that classical electromagnetism couldn't explain but Dollard's theories could. Perhaps you could present or refer us to an example?
Back to top
Uspring
Mon Jul 30 2012, 06:31PM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
I have an issue with renormalisation: it's ugly However I'm no physicist and wouldn't know where to start coming up with something better.
If you're an engineer you shouldn't have an issue with a well working kludge smile

Mattski wrote:
Much like classical mechanics, classical electromagnetism seems to be the correct model for phenomena which do not fall into the quantum or relativistic domains.
I suppose you don't refer to Maxwells equations by "classical electromagnetism". The Maxwell equations are covariant and conform to special relativity.

Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.