If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #3358
Joined: Mon Oct 25 2010, 09:47AM
Location:
Posts: 20
Been doin a bunch of home electronics lately and im largely self taught. however having no official teaching in all this and going off online guides and such has left a fair few holes in my knowledge on the matter. My main question right now is wat on earth are the circled symbols in the pic. Am i to assume that all of the "ground" wires, as google tells me, are the negative terminal or something? And yes, yes i do know how idiotic this question is, i would rather make sure i get being young and stupid out of the way before i try being old and wise.
ps im not actually building that circuits, it just annoys me as i cant understand those circuits because of that one forsaken symbol which really does bug me. and if they are just a negative terminal why not put it as that symbol?
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
The simple answer is - assume all of those symbols are connected together at 0v. That will do for getting to understand how the ideal circuit should be working.
There are several layers of subtlety that you will have to get to grips with in future years, but all at 0v will do for now. The subtleties are to do with the fact that not all of those ground symbols will be at *exactly* the same voltage in a real operating circuit. For most circuits this won't matter too much, but when very high currents, or very high frequencies, or very low level signals are involved, it can make the difference between the circuit working as expected, and not, like an audio modulated Tesla coil for instance.
Registered Member #3358
Joined: Mon Oct 25 2010, 09:47AM
Location:
Posts: 20
also by connected together do you mean that they are all connected by wires???? Like i said in the op i have quite a few gaps in knowledge in this area of science
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Yes, it's not a very well-drawn circuit. It doesn't show the power supply and assumes you already know enough to work it out. Use a 12v power supply with the +ve to all the 12V symbols, and the -ve to all the ground symbols. All the ground symbols are assumed to be at the same 0V.
On this circuit, the power supply negative does connect to ground. However, a different circuit could use a positive ground. Ground just means 0v. Most circuits we see, because of the peculiarities of solid-state physics that mean that NPN transistors and N-ch FETs are better and cheaper than the P-type, are drawn with a positive rail, which means the more negative supply terminal goes to ground. If the circuit used +ve and -ve rails, as an audio circuit with dual rail op-amps might, then the supply 0v terminal would go to ground.
The ground terminal does not have to be connected to any other "ground", at least not for a circuit like this, whether that's the house mains ground, or a spike driven into wet soil outside. Linking up with any other ground is strictly something that's done for other reasons, like safety regulations. The ground symbol when used like this really means the outer metal case of the bit of equipment that you're building. Unfortunately, ground has several different meanings, and it may or may not be obvious from the context what is meant.
"Are they connected by wire?" Good question, which goes right to the heart of my earlier warnings about subtleties you might eventually have to master.
Ideally, they are all connected to the same identical point, the so-called star ground. This can be awkward to use in practice, and while it's ideal, it's rarely necessary. But it is a very good starting point. Nobody ever messed up using a star point ground.
Next best is they are all connected to a very low resistance and low inductance conductor, like a plane of metal. This would typically be the ground plane on a board, or the metalwork of an instrument case.
A solid ground plane can be approximated well by a lattice of connected conductors or a lattice of traces on a board.
Remember you are always striving to get zero resistance and zero inductance between all of those ground symbols. OK, once you know a bit more, you can relax that restriction, but for the moment, that way will work.
A really good way to get nasty problems in your circuit is to forget that a length of thin wire does *not* approximate a star point or a ground plane well, that is its resistance and inductance are not negligible. If one part of your circuit is pushing a current through the wire, and another part is sensing a small voltage with respect to the wrong end of that wire, it will pick up an error voltage due to the current, or the changes of current, and may not do what you want.
If you have several systems, each with their own ground, then clearly a star point is not going to work, even theoretically. Believe me, even very experienced engineers can flounder with how to connect their grounds under those circumstances.
Registered Member #3358
Joined: Mon Oct 25 2010, 09:47AM
Location:
Posts: 20
hmmm alright, could i ask one more question then? im working on this circuit here atm i've connected the negative terminal of my power supply to the "ground" symbol it has as it seems the only possible option really. If i understood wat you said correctly then im fine with having it connected as such right? if not where should the negative terminal attach to?
Registered Member #3358
Joined: Mon Oct 25 2010, 09:47AM
Location:
Posts: 20
this circuit ( is still really annoying me. does the watt value on the resistors impact the performance of the inductor discharging into the capacitor bank by any chance?
Ah, I remember when I was a noob... I'm not a noob but I'm still novice at it. :P those circled symbols are one of the first ones I learned. It symbolizes "ground" or the point of zero volts, lower potential (voltage) than the source, or the negative terminal of a battery (though technically, it would be the positive, however, that's another story). It simplifies schematics, when its large, otherwise there'd be so many lines that over-complicates a circuit. :3 hope that was simple enough.
Registered Member #1792
Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
lewylln wrote ...
this circuit ( is still really annoying me. does the watt value on the resistors impact the performance of the inductor discharging into the capacitor bank by any chance?
The watt rating is a measure of how much power the resistor can safely dissipate before overheating. Power dissipating in a resistor is equal to the voltage across it times the current through it, and if you remember that V=I*R this means P=V*I=V^2/R=I^2*R. There's another rating to consider which is the voltage rating - at a high enough voltage there is some risk of failure even if the power rating is met.
The 1M resistor in the voltage sense section will have 500V across it which is pretty large, and it will be dissipating about 1/4W when the capacitor is charged to 500V. To calculate the exact voltage you also technically need to account for the 10k resistor and 12k resistor in series with it, but because the 1M resistor is so much larger it will be dropping most of the 500V and most of the power. Typical rated voltage for 1/4W resistors is about 250V, so to be on the safe side if using 1/4W resistors you could split the 1M resistor into two 500k resistors in series which would each be running at 250V and 125mW. You could also use a bigger resistor, maybe 1W or so.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.