Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 60
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

X-Ray Spectrum Characteristics

Move Thread LAN_403
IntraWinding
Thu May 31 2012, 04:12PM Print
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
I've noticed talk about very soft X-Rays here for some time
and wondered what it is about them that particularly draws interest?
More broadly, since Wikipedia doesn't go into much detail, can anyone
sum up what are the particular characteristics and applications of the
various regions of the X-Ray Spectrum?
Back to top
IntraWinding
Mon Jun 04 2012, 05:41PM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
No one knows, or no one's telling?
Back to top
radiotech
Tue Jun 05 2012, 02:55AM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
X-ray spectroscopy using soft X-rays ?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Jun 05 2012, 10:02AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
IntraWinding wrote ...

No one knows, or no one's telling?

Sorry not to have replied quicker, Alan.

X-ray lasers, and x-ray microscopy, both use low energy X-rays, and there is growing interest in x-ray astronomy using these longer wavelengths.
There is a large and growing body of scientific research on ultra-soft rays, and their application in biological imaging in particular.

From the point of view of the amateur scientist, low energy x-rays are attractive because power supply requirements are relatively modest, and much lighter and less costly shielding can be used to contain the ionising radiation. As I have written in my Life Below 5 keV project thread: Nothing described or discussed here is a "radiation generator" as defined by The Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999 and European Council Directive 92/3/Euratom as "electrical equipment emitting ionising radiation and containing components operating at a potential difference of more than 5kV"

But great care must still be taken if adverse events are to be avoided.

While tubes with beryllium windows remain the standard small-scale means for producing photons down to a few keV, glow discharges can produce abundant emission in the ultra-soft, offering the amateur the chance to make their own sources using only relatively modest vacuums compared with the pressures needed in thermionic X-ray tubes.

The production, manipulation, detection, and dosimetry of ultra soft x-rays are all open to pioneering and experiment, and all offer the challenge of devising and constructing equipment that cannot be bought off the shelf, or found in electronic scrap yards.








Back to top
IntraWinding
Fri Jun 15 2012, 07:16PM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
Thanks - That's a lot of good reasons. I guess though that if these rays are easily shielded, then by the same token they won't be much use for taking conventional looking x-ray photographs. Is it useful to to think of this region as short wave UV instead?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jun 15 2012, 08:43PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
IntraWinding wrote ...

I guess though that if these rays are easily shielded, then by the same token they won't be much use for taking conventional looking x-ray photographs.

It's more a question of choosing the wavelength most suitable to the task in hand. The 70 keV rays used in dental imaging wouldn't be of any use at all
in the radiography of a jellyfish. The ultra soft rays used in the x-ray microscopy of biolgical sections would cut no mustard in the imaging of steel castings.

IntraWinding wrote ...

Is it useful to to think of this region as short wave UV instead?

The term 'Grenz rays' was at one time widely applied to very soft x-rays seen as being on the 'border' (German: grenze) between XUV and X-rays proper.

I have bought the term back into use to indicate rays below 4.999 keV produced by sources using less than a potential difference of 5 kV - and therefor not a 'radiation generator' as defined by IRR 99 and EC law.

A number of manufacturers such as Hamamatsu have started produced equipment using 4.9 kV x-ray tubes in order to avoid the encumbrance of the UK and EC regulatory framework.




Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.