Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 92
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

high side mosfet problems

Move Thread LAN_403
Ben Solon
Thu Apr 26 2012, 07:41PM Print
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
hey... i am embarrassed even to ask a question like this, but is there any way to drive a mosfet half bridge's high side mosfet if they are both n channel without a gtd or isolated drivers? you have to have a reference that is positive relative to the point in between the mosfets. which would be easy in the way that i am used to: high power inverters using gdt's. it would also be easy with a p channel on the high side. but am using small mosfets at low voltages, low to the point where a gdt driving circuit would be as powerful as the inverter itself.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Fri Apr 27 2012, 02:37AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
Not sure what gdt stand for, but typically I used a cheap voltage doubler to drive low-RDSon balanced H-bridges under 13.5v (i.e. the cheap Fet's I use have a maximum Vgs of around 15.3v.)

For example, on a high current 13.2v battery the lower gates would be around 12.5v before the current limiting resister and passive pull down bias resister (still wise to do this with some FETs). After the doubler, output is around 24.3v relative to ground, but more importantly the high side FET sees its saturation voltage of 10.8v.


The gains these days is usually high enough that even a 555 may provide enough current for the high side gate. I typically add a regulator that acts a bit like a gain follower, but mostly it depends on whats being driven.


It helps to post a schematic of your output section.... =)
Rod

1335493740 65 FT137630 Voltagedoubler
Back to top
Electroholic
Fri Apr 27 2012, 09:06AM
Electroholic Registered Member #191 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 02:01AM
Location: Esbjerg Denmark
Posts: 720
Then can't you just get two highppower gate drivers and use them as half bridge sub assembles?
Back to top
Ben Solon
Fri Apr 27 2012, 11:59AM
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
Carbon rod: I am concerned with delays in the doubler. Is this something to be worried about? It will operate up to 100khz and I can't cross conduct. I would use smaller caps to reduce the time constant, but then the signal may have noise.
And gdt is gate drive transformer.

Electroholic: gate drive chips would have to be on a floating supply in order to reference the signal to the source. This is what I am trying to avoid, as it would be way too large for this. Who wants a floating supply to power the inverter for a floating supply?
Back to top
dude_500
Fri Apr 27 2012, 01:59PM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
Look at Steve Ward's output stage of his universal controller: Link2

It works for low voltages/powers where a P-Fet is an option.

Keep in mind it has certain output restrictions, for instance you can't have a high output maintained forever since high side fet is triggered capacitively
Back to top
Ben Solon
Fri Apr 27 2012, 02:18PM
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
I am aware of Steve's design. I have looked it over already and run simulations to try to adapt it to an n channel fet, but it will only work with p fet on the high side.
Back to top
Mattski
Fri Apr 27 2012, 03:45PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
What about going with the bootstrapped gate driver (this may be what you called an isolated driver): Link2

You can buy a chip like that or build one yourself. The basic concept is that when the lower half-bridge FET is turned on the bottom of Cboot is at 0V, and the top terminal charges to Vin. When the bottom FET turns off and the top FET starts to turn on, the bottom of Cs floats up to a higher voltage (eventually Vin when the top FET is fully on), and as the capacitor is charged to Vin, the top terminal of the cap is now at 2*Vin. You need a level shifter circuit to get the gate drive signal up to the floating voltage of the high side.

Other than floating drivers and gate drive transformers the only options I can think of are secondary power supplies like Carbon Rod's. If you have an input voltage Vin and you want to drive your FET to Vgs=10V, then you need a power supply of Vin+10V. You can even use a battery to provide this, it's a bit of a hack but as long as you don't mind occasionally replacing the battery: Put a 9V battery on the positive input of Vin to get a rail at Vin+9V and use this to drive your high-side FET.
Back to top
Ben Solon
Fri Apr 27 2012, 07:32PM
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
Ok, thread solved. I like Mattski's drive ic a lot, but there was an even simpler solution to what I was trying to accomplish than using a half bridge. I will probably still try the half bridge as I like the idea more, but I could just as easily use push pull topology.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Apr 27 2012, 08:43PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
ben123324 wrote ...

... but I could just as easily use push pull topology.
if you can afford the extra copper volume, then yes. Push pull is easy.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.