Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 62
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

BBC: 'Twisted' waves could boost capacity of wi-fi and TV

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Proud Mary
Fri Mar 02 2012, 11:18PM Print
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
'Twisted' waves could boost capacity of wi-fi and TV

Link2
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Sat Mar 03 2012, 10:46PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Hmm, never realised you could simply shape a reflector to generate the desired phase front of the wave to generate/receive waves with orbital angular momentum.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Mar 04 2012, 07:56AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Can somebody explain how this is different to just running two antennas, one for each polarisation, each carrying a different signal? That would double the bandwidth, but if you turn the receiver sideways the channels get mixed up. smile It's also a risky ploy because reflections can change the polarisation.

The twisted satellite dish in the picture looks like it would generate a circularly polarised beam, as a helical antenna does. That in itself is nothing special, but maybe they are beaming both polarisations onto it from two transmitters.
Back to top
Avalanche
Sun Mar 04 2012, 10:29AM
Avalanche Registered Member #103 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:16PM
Location: Derby, UK
Posts: 845
I recognised the 'Bo Thide' name from the author of a book on electromagnetic field theory, which I actually downloaded from a link on 4hv a couple of years ago. Whatever this guy thinks he's doing will no doubt fit the theory in his book somewhere (attached). I don't know if it's getting into the realms of pseudoscience or not, although IIRC the original thread did eventually get closed!
]bo_thide_-_electromagnetic_field_theory.pdf[/ file]
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sun Mar 04 2012, 10:30AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Steve Conner wrote ...

Can somebody explain how this is different to just running two antennas, one for each polarisation, each carrying a different signal? That would double the bandwidth, but if you turn the receiver sideways the channels get mixed up. smile It's also a risky ploy because reflections can change the polarisation.

According to Tamburini et al:

Unlike already existing radio communication protocols that use the spatial phase distribution generated by a set of antennae to artificially increase the transmission bandwidth, the immediate advantage provided by a protocol based on the physical OAM states as independent communication channels is that of using the peculiar spatial phase distribution of each of these states as a reference pattern to generate, modulate and detect them in a better way.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Sun Mar 04 2012, 02:32PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Steve Conner wrote ...

The twisted satellite dish in the picture looks like it would generate a circularly polarised beam, as a helical antenna does. That in itself is nothing special, but maybe they are beaming both polarisations onto it from two transmitters.
AFAICS circular polarization is actually a separate issue ... circular polarization results from spin angular momentum but here they use orbital angular momentum. Either way, you can generate more orthogonal channels than with linear polarization (2).

The only problem I see is that if something simple like antenna shape can create/detect angular momentum, then simple environmental reflections will be able to change the angular momentum of a wave as well ... it only seems relevant to line of sight (and waveguide/fiber) applications.
Back to top
IntraWinding
Tue Mar 13 2012, 01:29AM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
This news also got me interested in the optical (laser) equivalent.
Link2
Link2

Even works on electrons.
Link2
Back to top
WaveRider
Mon Apr 02 2012, 03:00PM
WaveRider Registered Member #29 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 09:00AM
Location: Hasselt, Belgium
Posts: 500
This is a quite different phenomenon from circular polarization. It is another form of "spatial diversity" that is angularly distributed instead of translationally distributed (x,y,z position of antennas..like MIMO).

It is a phenomenon common to any type of wave motion (even sound). I think labeling it with the "quantum orbital angular momentum" is somewhat misleading, but it shows where the idea came from....

The key to understanding it is to think about the phase of the wavefronts of a linearly polarized spherical wave at the reflector focus as they reflect from that "corkscrewy" parabolic reflector... what type of plane wave propagates away from the reflector into space? It will still be (mostly) linearly polarized but the "constant phase surface" will have a helicoidal shape. Then you will see how it is different from circular polarization.

Cheers!
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Apr 02 2012, 03:02PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
WaveRider wrote ...

It is another form of "spatial diversity" that is angularly distributed instead of translationally distributed (x,y,z position of antennas..like MIMO).
Thanks! That's a great explanation. I get it now.

I'm still skeptical about how practical it might be if the receiver is allowed to move around, though.
Back to top
radiotech
Tue Apr 03 2012, 12:21AM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Wouldn't angular momentum infer that there would be a mechanical twisting effect in the
opposite direction acting on the dish mount?


Might make a neat space elevator drive.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.