Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 65
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

PID Loops for SMPS's.

Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Sat Jan 28 2012, 08:47AM Print
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Has anyone here on the forum used PID control loops for the feed back of our SMPS's?
Back to top
Sulaiman
Sat Jan 28 2012, 11:06AM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Unlikely as it may cause oscillations with reactive or even varying loads.
Back to top
Electra
Sat Jan 28 2012, 12:09PM
Electra Registered Member #816 Joined: Sun Jun 03 2007, 07:29PM
Location:
Posts: 156
Well kind of thought as the typical voltage mode typeIII compensation network had 3 terms it was already approaching something similar to a PID loop, though the proportional gain at dc, often seem to be set at infinite.

Apologies if I have got it wrong or misunderstood what you meant, have a lot to learn about power design myself.
Back to top
Patrick
Sat Jan 28 2012, 02:43PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Electra wrote ...

Well kind of thought as the typical voltage mode typeIII compensation network had 3 terms it was already approaching something similar to a PID loop, though the proportional gain at dc, often seem to be set at infinite.

Apologies if I have got it wrong or misunderstood what you meant, have a lot to learn about power design myself.

Electra, you did get my correct meaning. However as for Sulaiman's comments, i fail to see why PID's would cuase bad behavior... my curiosity lies with how the typical C||(R,C) circuit that lays across the out and the in op-amp on all those IC's would be modded to accept A PID sYstem.
Back to top
radiotech
Sat Jan 28 2012, 03:16PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
The PID could handle thermal regulation quite well, and if you think about it
the root of Ohms law is just heat handling. At least while we cant make superconductor
SMPSs.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sat Jan 28 2012, 03:33PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
A PID can control anything, it is the general case of all linear control loops.

Proportional gain at DC makes no sense. It's the integral gain that does that. As soon as you set the integral gain greater than zero, you get infinite gain at DC.

The standard SMPS compensation circuit is equivalent to a PI controller, which is of course a PID with the D set to 0. The extra little capacitor across the whole thing isn't part of the PI scheme. It's just there to slug noise at the switching frequency, it is too small to affect the loop dynamics. (if you make it big enough to affect the dynamics, its effect is destabilising)

Lately people here have been experimenting with non-linear control schemes like bang-bang and delta modulation, and claim better transient response than linear PWM. One advantage of these schemes is, it's almost impossible to screw up the compensation because instability is actually the way they work.

Back to top
Patrick
Sat Jan 28 2012, 06:04PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Steve Conner wrote ...

A PID can control anything, it is the general case of all linear control loops.
yep, precisly. a PID loop will always work (even without the "plant" devices being known), however there are more optimised solutions if the interior of the device can be defined.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.