Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 20
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Alessandro (32)
Andrew L. (33)
bwsparxz (51)
Bonehead (34)
Tetris (27)


Next birthdays
06/29 Wirenut (47)
06/29 Dieu (35)
06/29 M477i3win2 (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Comparing power transformer ferrite materials

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Kizmo
Wed Jan 25 2012, 07:24AM Print
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Im having some difficulties with comparing different ferrite materials. Contestants are:

Epcos N30 Link2,property%3DData__en.pdf

Ferroxcube 3c90 Link2


If cores are same size and operating conditions are 300mT, 50kHz sinusoidal drive waveform. Which One of these cores have larger core losses and by how much.

Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jan 25 2012, 07:28AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
OK, ok let me look...


1327478701 2431 FT1630 Ferrite
These to graphs are from you 3C90 material, i dont see their equivelents on the epcos datasheets.
Back to top
Kizmo
Wed Jan 25 2012, 08:17AM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Thats the problem :(

They seem to use very different methods for listing core losses and i have no idea how these numbers compare.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jan 25 2012, 08:21AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
if they dont list the loss conditions, then theres nothing to compare.

Im suspicious that the EPCOS maybe crap material, for that very reason. Or perhaps not meant for power usage. Your sure you have the complete datasheet for the N30?
Back to top
Kizmo
Wed Jan 25 2012, 08:29AM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Epcos uses relative loss factor on their datasheets all over
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jan 25 2012, 08:57AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Kizmo wrote ...

Epcos uses relative loss factor on their datasheets all over
I really dont think that allows a comparison or is an equivlent (even with some fancy math). in any case, for the 3C90 material... 300mT, 50kHz you can expect about 500kW/m^3 of loss, so take your core volume and multiply by that. Youd would want to keep the ferrite temp at 90C other wise (above or below 90C) your loss will increase.

i prefer the TSF-50-ALL material, but i dont know your application. (50ALL would also yield about 500kW/m^3, but i dont know your temperature dependence, from 40C to 100C the loss rate is substantially flat.)

Imust admit 3C90 is a perfectly fine material, many use it. the N30 i have doubts about....

I think JPsmith might chime in too.

Back to top
Kizmo
Wed Jan 25 2012, 09:36AM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
T65 which is best Epcos power material for low frequency stuff (according to their app note..) has just tiny bit lower loss factor at 50kHz than N30.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jan 25 2012, 09:51AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Kizmo wrote ...

T65 which is best Epcos power material for low frequency stuff (according to their app note..) has just tiny bit lower loss factor at 50kHz than N30.

Whats thier datasheet say for temp depencance, and what is your planned thermal profile?

Once you get to the question of:
this one is a little better than that one, you must account for the other factors that will alter the tiny gain you first sought.


Back to top
Kizmo
Wed Jan 25 2012, 10:39AM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Here are two screenshots from epcos datasheets T65 vs N30 and one of their app note stated that T65 is their state of the art power transformer material for this low frequency range.


1327487510 599 FT133054 N30 1327487510 599 FT133054 T65


My application is large induction heater which will have transformer driven tank circuit. Reason why i want to compare these two materials from ferroxcube and epcos is that i have friend who made well working induction heater with transformer wound on 3c90 core and i happen to have same size N30 cores laying around.

3c90 in this application stays almost stone cold but i dont mind if i need to apply some airflow to my transformer.

Maybe i should just pop it in and see what it does.. cheesey
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jan 25 2012, 07:27PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Kizmo youshould call this EPCOS company and find out why they use tan sigma over u sub i or whatever, if they cant give you a striaght answer i wouldnt use their material in a system critical application.
Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.